Definition
A notice of inquiry is a formal written notification required to be given by a plaintiff to the defendant (or the defendant's attorney or solicitor) before executing a writ of inquiry. It alerts the opposing party to the time and place at which a writ of inquiry will be executed — that is, when a jury or officer will be convened to assess the quantum of damages in a case where liability has already been established, typically by default or by a judgment on the pleadings that left damages unliquidated.
The notice served several procedural functions: it afforded the defendant an opportunity to appear and contest the amount of damages, even after losing on the merits, and it provided a defined timeline within which the proceedings would occur. Standard notice required ten days; a shortened "short notice" required four days. Separate notice obligations attached to continuances of an inquiry, and a countermand of notice could be given in either town or country unless a court or judge ordered otherwise.
As a practical matter, notice of inquiry is a creature of English common law pleading procedure and its American counterparts. It belongs to the procedural architecture surrounding the writ of inquiry itself, which has been largely displaced by modern rules-based civil procedure.
---
Common Confusion
Notice of inquiry should not be confused with the modern procedural concept of notice more broadly, or with discovery-related notices such as a notice of deposition or notice of inspection. The term is also distinct from a "notice of inquest," though the two are closely related — an inquest being the proceeding itself and the notice of inquiry being the prerequisite written warning. Researchers working in historical pleading materials should also distinguish this term from the broader category of statutory notice requirements (such as notice of breach or notice to quit), which follow entirely different rules and purposes.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This term is historically bounded. Researchers encountering it in American or English cases, pleading manuals, or practice treatises from the eighteenth or nineteenth century should understand it as a procedural formality tied to the writ of inquiry — a mechanism that has no direct analog in modern federal or most state civil procedure. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1938) effectively ended the formal writ system in federal courts, and state procedural reforms followed. A notice of inquiry appearing in a pre-reform case record signals that the case was in the damages-assessment phase following an earlier liability determination.
The chief trap for researchers: the phrase "notice of inquiry" sounds generic and modern, but in historical sources it carries this specific technical meaning. Do not read it as a general term for investigative notice, administrative inquiry notice, or regulatory inquiry. Context and date are dispositive.
For English sources, the procedural rules governing notice of inquiry appeared in practice manuals — Chitty's Archbold's Practice (cited in Bouvier's as "2 Chit. Arch. Prac.") and Wharton's treatises were standard references. American courts adapted these rules variably by jurisdiction and era, so the specific notice periods and formalities may differ across state sources.
When researching damages proceedings in historical common law cases, notice of inquiry is a checkpoint: its presence or absence, and whether it was properly given, was frequently a ground for challenging the validity of an inquisition into damages.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Both Rapalje & Lawrence and Bouvier's converge on the same procedural core: the plaintiff must give written notice to the defendant or counsel before executing a writ of inquiry. Bouvier's is brief, pointing to Chitty and Wharton as the authoritative practice sources. Rapalje & Lawrence is more granular, specifying the ten-day standard notice period and the four-day short notice period, and drawing the distinction between notice and countermand of notice — countermand being more flexible as to where it could be given (town or country), while original notice and notice of continuance required town.
Neither source addresses the underlying writ of inquiry at length in this entry, treating it as assumed knowledge. Neither accounts for the abolition of the writ system under modern procedure, which reflects their historical context. Rapalje & Lawrence's treatment is the more practically useful of the two for a researcher trying to reconstruct the procedural sequence in a historical case.
What the historical dictionaries do not address: the consequences of defective notice (grounds for setting aside the inquisition), the role of the sheriff in executing writs of inquiry, or the transition period in American jurisdictions between common law pleading and code pleading under the Field Code reforms (post-1848). Researchers in that transitional period should consult state-specific practice materials.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Notice of inquiry rules were never uniform across American jurisdictions. English practice, as codified in treatises like Chitty's Archbold, served as the baseline, but individual states modified notice periods and formalities by statute or court rule. The term effectively became obsolete in federal courts with the adoption of the Federal Rules in 1938 and in most state courts as code and rules-based pleading displaced common law forms of action.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
The Law Mind Contracts & Commercial Law Encyclopedia: Breach — Notice of Breach Requirements (contracts_62) — for modern notice requirements in a breach context, which are conceptually distinct but may illuminate why historical law placed procedural weight on written notice.
---