Definition
Non tenure (also written non-tenure) is a plea in a real action by which a defendant — styled the "tenant" in the real action context — denies holding the freehold estate in the land or rent demanded by the plaintiff. The plea asserts, in effect, "I am not the tenant of this land," and thereby challenges the plaintiff's right to proceed against the defendant at all.
The plea took two recognized forms: (1) general non tenure, by which the defendant denied ever having been tenant of the land in question, and (2) special non tenure, by which the defendant denied being tenant specifically on the day the writ was purchased (i.e., the date the action was commenced). The distinction mattered because the special form admitted prior tenancy while disputing present status, while the general form denied any tenancy at any relevant time.
---
Common Confusion
Non tenure is classified differently across historical sources, and this inconsistency can mislead researchers. Burrill notes that non tenure "is usually called a plea in abatement, but is not strictly so." Rapalje & Lawrence describe it as "a plea in bar." The procedural consequences of the distinction were real: a plea in abatement generally required the plaintiff to recommence with a corrected writ, while a plea in bar defeated the action outright. The slippage between these categories in historical commentary reflects genuine doctrinal uncertainty in the old real actions, not mere loose terminology.
Non tenure should also be distinguished from ne unques seisie, which denied that the plaintiff ever had seisin, and from nontenure as an informal shorthand for academic tenure status in modern usage — a wholly unrelated concept.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Non tenure is a term of the old common law real actions — the ancient forms of action (such as the writ of right, novel disseisin, and their relatives) that were largely abolished in England by the Real Property Limitation Acts and the Common Law Procedure Acts of the nineteenth century, and in American jurisdictions by the adoption of code pleading and, later, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. By the late nineteenth century, real actions had essentially disappeared from American practice, which means the term is almost exclusively a term of historical and comparative legal research.
Researchers encountering non tenure in primary sources prior to roughly 1850 should be alert to the procedural context: real actions had their own pleading sequence, vocabulary, and cast of characters (demandant, tenant, vouchee) that differs substantially from personal actions. The word "tenant" in this context means the party holding the land who is being sued — not a landlord-tenant relationship in the modern sense.
The inconsistency between Rapalje & Lawrence (plea in bar) and Burrill (technically not a plea in abatement, though called one) is a genuine doctrinal fault line worth tracking if the plea's procedural effect is material to your research. Early English reporters and treatise writers were not uniform on the point.
Researchers using this term as a search string in historical corpus materials should expect significant noise: "non-tenure" in documents from the twentieth century onward almost always refers to academic employment status, not to pleading in real actions. Filter by publication date and legal context accordingly.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Both sources agree on the core definition: non tenure is a plea by the tenant in a real action denying the freehold tenancy alleged by the demandant. Both also agree that it arises specifically in real actions, not personal actions.
The two sources diverge on procedural classification. Rapalje & Lawrence call it plainly "a plea in bar," while Burrill — citing Roscoe's Real Actions — acknowledges the common label of plea in abatement but expressly distances the plea from that category ("not strictly so"). This divergence is historically significant. Pleas in abatement and pleas in bar operated differently: abatement delayed or redirected the action without adjudicating the merits, while a bar disposed of the action on the merits. The ambiguous procedural home of non tenure reflects the fact that a successful plea of non tenure did not necessarily decide who owned the land — it simply established that this defendant was the wrong party to sue, which has characteristics of both abatement and bar depending on the circumstances.
Burrill's Latin-French form — "noun tenoure" — preserves the Law French origin of real action pleading vocabulary. Researchers working with Year Books or early English reports will encounter this orthographic variant.
Neither source discusses the American reception of non tenure, likely because by the time these dictionaries were compiled (mid-to-late nineteenth century), real actions had already been substantially displaced in the United States by code pleading reforms.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Real actions, and with them non tenure as a live pleading tool, were abolished or superseded at different times in different jurisdictions. England effectively ended them through nineteenth-century procedural reform. American states varied: some abolished real actions early through reception statutes or constitutional provisions; others retained vestigial forms longer. Researchers should identify the specific jurisdiction and date before assuming non tenure was available or unavailable as a plea.
---