NEFASTUS

4 definitions found across Law Mind sources

NEFASTUSAuthored
The Law Mind • 735 words
Definition
A Latin term from Roman law meaning inauspicious or unlawful. A nefastus day (dies nefastus) was a day on which it was forbidden to open the courts or administer justice. On such days, the praetor could not lawfully pronounce the three words of formal legal proceedings — do, dico, addico — and no valid judicial acts could be performed. The term is the antonym of fastus, which designated days on which court business was permitted. The Roman calendar divided days into categories regulating when public and religious business could be conducted. Dies nefasti were days set apart by religion or custom as inauspicious for legal and civic action, distinct from dies fasti, on which the courts were open, and dies comitiales, on which assemblies could meet.
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): "Nefastus" does not appear as a standard English word. Its derivative "nefarious" — meaning wicked or criminal — appears in modern English usage. Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Not listed as a standalone English entry; treated as a Latin term appearing in historical and ecclesiastical contexts related to the Roman calendar. The gap here is significant. A modern researcher encountering "nefastus" might associate it with "nefarious" and assume a general connotation of wrongdoing or wickedness. The legal and Roman calendar meaning is narrower and procedural: the term designates a formally prohibited day for judicial proceedings, not a moral characterization of an act or person.
Why It Matters in Research
This term appears almost exclusively in sources treating Roman law, civil law history, or the history of courts and legal procedure. Researchers encountering nefastus in historical legal texts should recognize it as a calendrical and procedural term, not a substantive legal standard. A key trap: because nefastus is Latin and its English derivative ("nefarious") carries moral weight, researchers may misread passages from Roman law commentaries or civil law treatises as making an ethical judgment when the author is instead making a procedural point about permissible court days. In the Law Mind corpus, nefastus is most relevant in materials covering Roman law foundations, the history of courts, and the civil law tradition. It may appear in treatises on legal history, canon law calendars, or comparative law discussions that trace the roots of court scheduling and judicial administration. It has no direct modern common law counterpart — common law systems developed entirely separate frameworks for court terms and non-sitting days (see: TERM OF COURT; DIES NON). Researchers working in early civil law sources should be aware that the Roman calendar classification system — fasti, nefasti, comitiales, and others — was a formal regulatory structure with legal consequences for the validity of proceedings, not merely a religious custom. Acts performed on a dies nefastus could be considered void or irregular.
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary (both the first and second editions) defines nefastus briefly and consistently: "Inauspicious. Applied, in the Roman law, to a day on which it was unlawful to open the courts or administer justice." Both editions immediately follow the entry with Latin maxims about negation (Negatio conclusionis est error in lege; Negatio destruit negationem), which are unrelated to nefastus — a product of alphabetical proximity rather than conceptual connection. Burrill's Law Dictionary provides the most etymologically precise entry, tracing the term to its components: ne (not) and fastus, and situating it within Roman law as a term of calendrical prohibition. Burrill's treatment is marginally fuller and more etymologically grounded than Black's, though all three sources agree on the core meaning. What the historical dictionaries collectively omit: any explanation of the broader Roman calendar system that gives nefastus its context, no discussion of the legal consequences of conducting proceedings on a dies nefastus, and no bridge to analogous concepts in later civil law or canon law traditions. The entries are definitional snapshots, not analytical guides.
Jurisdictional Note
Nefastus is a term of Roman law with no operative application in modern common law jurisdictions. It may appear in Louisiana, Quebec, or other mixed civil law jurisdictions' historical legal literature, or in scholarly works on the civil law tradition, but it carries no current procedural force in any major legal system.
Related Terms
Fastus — Dies Non Juridicus — Term of Court — Dies Fasti — Roman Law — Civil Law — Judicial Day — CalendarLegal — Court Term
NEFASTUSmain
Black's Law Dictionary • 1891
Lat. Inauspicious. Ap-what shall not be done. plied, in the Roman law, to a day on which it was unlawful to open the courts or admin- ister justice. in Negatio conclusionis est error lege. Wing. 268. The denial of a conclu- sion is error in law. Negatio destruit negationem, et am- bæ faciunt affirmationem. A negative destroys a negative, and both make an af- firmative. Co. Litt. 1466. Lord Coke cites this as a rule of grammatical construction, not always applying in law. Negatio duplex est affirmatio. A double negative is an affirmative.
NEFASTUSmain
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) • 1910
Lat. Inauspicious. Applied, in the Roman law, to a day on which it was unlawful to open the courts or administer justice. Negatio conclusionis est error in lege. Wing. 268. The denial of a conclusion is error in law. Negatio destruit negationem, et ambse faciunt affirmationem. A negative destroys a negative, and both make an affirmative. Co. Litt. 1460. Lord Coke cites’ this as a rule of grammatical construction, not always applying in law. Negatio duplex est affirmatio. A double negative is an affirmative.
NEFASTUSmain
Burrill's Law Dictionary • 1870
Lat. [from ne, not, and fastus, q. v.] In Roman law. A term applied to a day on which it was unlawful

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In