Definition
A Law French term meaning apostates or unbelievers — persons who had renounced or rejected the Christian faith. In medieval English legal contexts, the designation carried social and legal consequences, as apostasy and religious nonconformity intersected with the common law's treatment of outliers from the established religious order. The term had no precise procedural function in the common law courts but appears in older legal writing as a category of persons whose standing, rights, or capacity might be questioned or limited under ecclesiastical and temporal law.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): No standard modern English entry. The term has passed entirely out of general use.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Not listed. By the nineteenth century the word had been obsolete in common English for centuries.
Editorial note: Because the term survives only in historical legal sources and has no living common-language counterpart, the gap between common and legal meaning cannot be meaningfully measured. Researchers encountering it should treat it as pure archaic legal vocabulary requiring contextual interpretation from the source period.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This term is a marker of medieval and early modern legal culture rather than a working legal category in later common law. Researchers will encounter it almost exclusively in two contexts: (1) glossaries and dictionaries compiling Law French terminology, and (2) primary sources from the period when ecclesiastical disabilities tracked into temporal legal status.
The practical trap is anachronism. A researcher reading a medieval or early modern text that references mescreauntes should not import modern conceptions of religious freedom or civil rights. In the period when the term was current, apostasy could have real consequences for a person's ability to hold property, testify in court, or claim the protection of the law — depending on jurisdiction and era. The term therefore functions as an entry point into the broader question of how religious status intersected with legal capacity in pre-modern English law.
The term also illustrates the limits of Black's Law Dictionary as a research tool for historical vocabulary: both editions reproduce identical two-word glosses ("apostates; unbelievers") without contextual elaboration. Researchers who need substantive guidance on how the concept functioned in practice will need to move beyond the dictionary shelf entirely — to Bracton, to ecclesiastical court records, or to specialized scholarship on medieval English law.
Within the Law Mind corpus, this entry connects to the broader cluster of Law French terms that preserve the vocabulary of medieval English legal administration. It sits alongside terms denoting religious, status-based, and capacity-limiting categories that have no direct modern equivalents.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Both Black's Law Dictionary (1st ed.) and Black's Law Dictionary (2nd ed.) give identical entries: "L. Fr. Apostates; unbelievers." There is no divergence between editions and no elaboration in either. The brevity is telling — by the time Black's was compiled in the late nineteenth century, the term was purely antiquarian. Neither edition attempts to describe the legal consequences that historically attached to the category, which limits their usefulness for researchers working in primary sources.
Historical dictionaries of Law French, such as Termes de la Ley and Rastell's Exposition of Certain Difficult and Obscure Words, would be the more appropriate shelf sources for understanding this vocabulary in its original context, though they too treat the term tersely. The absence of development across dictionary editions confirms that mescreauntes never acquired technical doctrinal content in the common law tradition — it remained a descriptive label borrowed from ecclesiastical vocabulary rather than a term of art with defined legal consequences in the common law courts.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The term belongs to the Law French layer of English legal vocabulary and has no relevance in American law. Researchers working in Scottish, Irish, or continental legal history should be cautious about assuming the term carried identical meaning across jurisdictions, as ecclesiastical law and its interaction with temporal courts varied considerably.
---