Definition
Matrimony is the state or condition of being lawfully married; the marital relation or status as recognized by law. The term is essentially synonymous with marriage when used to describe the ongoing legal bond between spouses, as distinguished from the ceremony or act by which that bond is created. Where legal writers have drawn a distinction, matrimony refers to the continuing status itself — what persists after the vows — rather than the solemnization that initiates it.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Marriage; the state of being married. Also used to refer to the ceremony of marriage itself, and, informally, to a spouse.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): The union of man and woman as husband and wife; the nuptial state; marriage; wedlock.
Editorial note: In ordinary English, matrimony comfortably refers to both the ceremony and the ongoing status, and speakers use the two interchangeably. Legal usage, by contrast, reserves matrimony for the status or relation that results from marriage, expressly excluding the ceremonial act. A researcher encountering "matrimony" in a legal text should not assume it refers to any particular ritual or solemnization — it almost certainly refers to the legal condition that follows.
---
Common Confusion
Matrimony and marriage overlap almost entirely in legal usage, and most sources treat them as synonyms. The distinction worth preserving is that marriage is the broader and more operationally active term in law — it covers the act of marrying, the contract entered into, and the resulting status — while matrimony is narrower, pointing specifically to the status or relation. Confusion arises in older ecclesiastical and equity sources where both terms appear in the same document with subtly different emphasis. Researchers should not treat the distinction as jurisdictionally or doctrinally significant in modern practice; it is primarily an interpretive and historical one.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The primary research value of understanding matrimony as distinct from marriage lies in navigating historical ecclesiastical jurisdiction. In English legal history, matrimonial causes — suits arising from and relating to the marital status — were for centuries heard by ecclesiastical courts, not common law courts. This means that pre-1857 English cases touching on matrimony (separation, restitution of conjugal rights, alimony, jactitation of marriage) will appear in ecclesiastical court records, not in the common law reporters most researchers instinctively reach for first. The Matrimonial Causes Act of 1857 transferred jurisdiction over these matters to a newly created civil court, and this jurisdictional shift is a crucial dividing line in the English corpus.
For American researchers, the ecclesiastical dimension is largely absent — colonial and early American courts treated marriage as a civil contract from the outset in most jurisdictions — but the term matrimony still surfaces in older statutes, pleadings, and jury charges as a formal synonym for the marital status. Treating it as interchangeable with marriage will be correct in virtually all American legal sources.
When reading historical authorities, pay attention to whether a source distinguishes "the contract of matrimony" (the agreement to marry) from "the state of matrimony" (the ongoing legal relation). Some older writers — particularly those writing in the ecclesiastical law tradition — were precise about this, and conflating the two can produce interpretive errors when tracing the development of doctrines around void and voidable marriages.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The historical dictionaries are notably sparse on this term, treating it as a simple redirect to marriage rather than an independent entry warranting development. Black's (both editions) defines it as "Marriage, in the sense of the relation or status, not of the ceremony" — a clean, precise distinction that captures the one meaningful doctrinal nuance the term carries. Bouvier merely redirects to marriage entirely. Anderson's is the most instructive, providing the term itself with minimal definition but expanding substantively on "matrimonial causes" and their treatment under English ecclesiastical jurisdiction, including the transformative effect of the Divorce Act of 1857. This expansion in Anderson's reflects the term's primary independent utility in legal writing: it tends to appear not in isolation but as the root of "matrimonial," particularly in the phrase "matrimonial causes," which was a term of art in English ecclesiastical and later civil procedure.
What the historical dictionaries collectively omit is any treatment of the American experience, the relationship between matrimony and natural law theories of marriage prominent in 19th-century treatises, or the later constitutional developments that reshaped the legal definition of the marital status itself. Researchers using these sources to understand modern American matrimonial law should treat them as historical baselines only.
---
Jurisdictional Note
In English law, matrimony carries a distinctive historical association with ecclesiastical jurisdiction that has no American parallel. American jurisdictions have generally treated marriage as a civil contract subject to state regulation, so the ecclesiastical law overlay visible in English sources does not translate directly. Researchers working across both traditions should be alert to this structural difference when comparing authorities.
---