Definition
Masters in Lunacy were judicial officers appointed under the authority of the Lord Chancellor of England, acting in the Chancellor's capacity as guardian of persons of unsound mind. Their function was twofold: first, to conduct formal inquiries — called commissions or inquisitions of lunacy — to determine whether a named individual was legally incapable of managing their own person and affairs; and second, once a person was formally found to be a lunatic, to investigate and superintend the management of that person's property for the lunatic's benefit.
The office was a specialized branch of the broader English system of Masters in Chancery. Because the Crown, acting through the Lord Chancellor, held a parens patriae responsibility over persons deemed incapable of self-governance, Masters in Lunacy served as the operational arm of that protective jurisdiction — conducting fact-finding, overseeing receivers or committees appointed to manage the lunatic's estate, and reporting to the Chancellor.
The office was formally abolished in England by the Lunacy Act 1890 and its successor legislation, which transferred functions to the newly structured Court of Protection and its administrative apparatus. The role has no direct modern equivalent, though its functions survive in fragmented form across guardianship courts, conservatorship proceedings, and the appointment of special masters or receivers in civil proceedings involving incapacitated persons.
---
Common Confusion
Masters in Lunacy should not be confused with Masters in Chancery generally. Masters in Chancery were general judicial officers of the Court of Chancery performing a broad range of evidentiary and administrative functions. Masters in Lunacy were a distinct, specialized class whose jurisdiction was confined to matters of mental incapacity and the management of lunatics' estates. The two roles overlapped institutionally but were not interchangeable.
The term "lunatic" itself carried specific legal meaning distinct from its common or medical usage. A legal lunatic was a person found incapable by formal inquisition — a determination with property and personal liberty consequences. Not every person of diminished mental capacity was a legal lunatic, and the formal finding was required before the Masters in Lunacy's supervisory jurisdiction over property attached.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This term is an almost purely historical one. Researchers will encounter it in English legal sources from roughly the late seventeenth through the late nineteenth century, and in American sources of the colonial and early federal period that borrowed English Chancery practice. Several points of navigational importance:
First, jurisdiction matters acutely. Masters in Lunacy as a formal office was an English institution. American jurisdictions adopted analogous but structurally varied mechanisms — some states vested similar functions in probate courts, others in equity courts, and the officer titles differ (committees of the person, guardians, receivers, referees). A researcher finding the term in an American source should determine whether the author is describing English practice by analogy or a jurisdiction-specific officer.
Second, the two-stage structure of the office is important for tracing records. The inquisition stage (finding of lunacy) and the property supervision stage generated different types of records. Chancery records, commission returns, and inquisition files are distinct from the ongoing accounting and management records produced during superintendence of the estate. Historical archives in England distinguish these accordingly.
Third, researchers working in the history of mental health law, disability law, or guardianship reform will find Masters in Lunacy central to understanding the pre-modern framework against which nineteenth- and twentieth-century reforms were directed. The abolition of the office and the transition to the Court of Protection are watershed moments in that history.
Fourth, the parens patriae rationale underlying the Masters in Lunacy function has direct doctrinal descendants in modern American guardianship and conservatorship law, and in the equity court's power to appoint receivers. The encyclopedia entry on Rule 53 special masters (civpro_119) reflects the procedural survival of the master-referee function, though stripped of the lunacy-specific jurisdiction.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Rapalje & Lawrence provide the foundational description accurately and concisely: Masters in Lunacy were officers of the Lord Chancellor, acting in the Chancellor's guardian capacity, with duties divided between holding inquisitions to establish incapacity and superintending property management once incapacity was found. This two-part structure is the essential architecture of the office.
What Rapalje & Lawrence do not address — and what researchers should supplement from other sources — is the institutional history: the gradual formalization of the office, its relationship to the broader Masters in Chancery structure, the procedural mechanics of the commission (including jury involvement in inquisitions), and the legislative reform that ultimately abolished it. The entry is accurate as a snapshot but thin as legal history. Researchers needing depth should consult Shelford's Practical Treatise on the Law Concerning Lunatics, Idiots, and Persons of Unsound Mind (1833) and the parliamentary debates surrounding the Lunacy Act 1890 for the abolition context.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The office of Master in Lunacy was specific to English law and jurisdictions directly derived from English Chancery practice. American states did not uniformly adopt the title or the office, though many borrowed the underlying parens patriae rationale and inquisition procedures. In researching American sources, expect to find the equivalent function distributed among probate judges, equity courts, and specially appointed committees or guardians rather than a dedicated class of Masters in Lunacy.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
The Law Mind Civil Procedure & Evidence Encyclopedia, civpro_119: Receivership and Appointment of Special Masters — Rule 53
---