MARRIAGE SETTLEMENT - The Law Mind Legal Dictionary

MARRIAGE SETTLEMENTAuthored

The Law Mind • 1311 words

Definition

A marriage settlement is a written agreement made in contemplation of marriage, and in consideration of it, by which property belonging to one or both parties — or contributed by a parent or other relation — is settled upon a defined course of succession or enjoyment. The agreement fixes the title to that property so that it passes according to its terms rather than by the ordinary rules of inheritance, dower, or the husband's common law marital rights. The property so settled becomes, to varying degrees, inalienable: neither spouse can ordinarily alienate or encumber it outside the terms of the settlement.

Two related but distinct configurations appear in the historical sources:

1. Ante-nuptial settlement (pre-marital): Made before the ceremony, in consideration of the marriage itself. The most common classical form. The consideration is the marriage, which gives the settlement enforceability against the settlor's creditors as a transaction for value.

2. Post-nuptial settlement: Made after marriage, by a husband out of his own estate for the benefit of his wife, children, or both. As Burrill notes, this form was recognized but treated differently — particularly in equity and in bankruptcy proceedings — because the marriage consideration had already been executed.

The typical object of a marriage settlement was to secure a portion of the family estate for the wife and the children of the marriage against the husband's common law power to control his wife's property, and against the claims of the husband's creditors.

Common Language

Modern common usage (Wiktionary): "Marriage settlement" does not appear as a standard entry; "settlement" in common use typically refers to a resolution of a dispute, a sum paid to resolve a claim, or the act of establishing a community in a new place.

Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): "Settlement" in its property sense referred to the act of settling property on a person, or the instrument by which it is settled — a usage closely aligned with the legal meaning but without the specifically matrimonial context.

The gap matters: a modern researcher encountering "settlement" in litigation or transactional contexts will instinctively read it as a dispute resolution. In older equity records, trust instruments, and family law pleadings, "settlement" almost always carries the property-conveyance meaning. A marriage settlement is not a compromise of a marital dispute — it is a constitutive property instrument, more analogous to a trust deed than to a modern prenuptial agreement, though it is the direct ancestor of that modern form.

Common Confusion

Marriage settlement vs. prenuptial agreement: These terms are often used interchangeably in modern commentary, but they are not identical in historical legal meaning. A prenuptial agreement (antenuptial agreement) in modern American law is primarily a contractual document allocating property rights and spousal support obligations in the event of divorce. A marriage settlement in its classical equity sense was primarily a conveyance — it transferred or limited property into a specific course of succession, creating equitable interests enforceable by the beneficiaries (including children not yet born). The mechanism was trust law, not mere contract. Modern prenuptial agreements largely abandoned the trust-settlement structure in favor of executory contract terms triggered by dissolution.

Marriage settlement vs. jointure: A jointure is a specific provision made for a wife's support after her husband's death — a subset of what a marriage settlement might accomplish, but not coextensive with it. A settlement could include a jointure for the wife, pin money during the marriage, portions for younger children, and remainder limitations, all in a single instrument.

Why It Matters in Research

The marriage settlement sits at the intersection of family law, equity, property law, and creditor law — and researchers must navigate all four bodies of doctrine to understand any particular instrument.

Terminology drift is the primary research trap. Before the mid-nineteenth century reforms (the Married Women's Property Acts in England and their American equivalents), marriage settlements were among the principal mechanisms by which women could hold property at all. Equity enforced the wife's separate estate under a settlement against the common law rule that a wife's property vested in her husband on marriage. Post-reform, the practical necessity of settlements declined sharply, and the vocabulary shifted. A nineteenth-century American equity reporter using "marriage settlement" may be applying English Chancery doctrine directly; a twentieth-century source using the same phrase may mean simply a premarital contract.

In the Law Mind corpus, marriage settlements appear most heavily in:
— Equity treatises and chancery court records (enforcement of trusts for wife and issue)
— Bankruptcy and fraudulent conveyance cases (whether a settlement made for value defeats creditors)
— Conflict of laws materials (which state's law governs a settlement made in one jurisdiction for property situated in another)
— Intestacy and wills materials (how a settlement interacts with the residuary estate)

The consideration question is legally significant and appears throughout the historical sources: an ante-nuptial settlement is made for good and valuable consideration (the marriage itself) and is therefore generally protected against the settlor's subsequent creditors. A post-nuptial settlement, made after the consideration has been fully executed, may be treated as a voluntary conveyance and thus vulnerable to challenge.

Researchers working in American jurisdictions should be alert to the fact that marriage settlement law developed unevenly across states. States that adopted civil law influences (Louisiana, some community property states) approached marital property agreements through different conceptual frameworks than those following English equity. The treatise by Atherly on Marriage Settlements (referenced by Bouvier) and Kent's Commentaries (referenced by Burrill at 2 Kent's Com. 172–178) are the principal secondary authorities in the American historical sources.

Historical Dictionary Support

Black's, Bouvier's, and Burrill's definitions are substantially consistent in their core description: a written agreement, made in contemplation of marriage, settling property on a prescribed course. The sources agree that the consideration of marriage is central, and that the effect is to render the property inalienable outside the settlement's terms.

Burrill adds a dimension the others understate: the explicit post-nuptial form, citing Stephens's Commentaries and Kent. This is useful because it signals that "marriage settlement" in historical sources is not always ante-nuptial, and researchers should not assume the pre-marital timing without confirming it in context.

Bouvier's definition — that the property "to some extent becomes inalienable" — is the most precise about the equitable mechanism, though Bouvier does not elaborate the trust structure that produced that inalienability.

What all three historical dictionaries omit: the interaction with the Married Women's Property Acts and the post-reform obsolescence of much classical settlement doctrine. Researchers relying solely on these entries would not understand why marriage settlement law largely disappeared from American case law in the twentieth century, displaced first by statutory property rights and later by the modern prenuptial agreement.

Jurisdictional Note

Louisiana's community property regime and its civilian tradition of marriage contracts (contrats de mariage) mean that Louisiana materials on "marriage settlements" should be read against French and Spanish civil law sources, not English equity. Community property states generally — California, Texas, Arizona, Nevada, and others — developed their own premarital agreement statutes that do not map cleanly onto the English settlement framework. Researchers working across jurisdictions should verify whether a given source is applying equity doctrine, civilian doctrine, or a statutory scheme.

Encyclopedia Cross-Reference

See The Law Mind Family Law Encyclopedia:
— Marriage — Covenant Marriage (State Variations): relevant for understanding modern contractual marriage frameworks that share structural roots with classical settlements.
— Marriage — Recognition of Foreign and Interstate Marriages: relevant when a settlement was executed in one jurisdiction and property or parties are located in another.

MARRIAGE SETTLEMENTmain

Black's Law Dictionary • 1891

A writ- ter agreement in the nature of a conveyance, called a "settlement," which is made in con- templation of a proposed marriage and in consideration thereof, either by the parties about to intermarry, or one of them, or by a parent or relation on their behalf, by which the title to certain property is settled, i. e., fixed or limited to a prescribed course of succession; the object being, usually, to pro- vide for the wife and children. Thus, the

MARRIAGE SETTLEMENTmain

Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928

An agreement made by the parties in contem- plation of marriage, by which the title to certain property is changed, and the prop- erty to some extent becomes inalienable. 1 Rice, Eq. 315. See 2 Hill, Ch. 3; 8 Leigh 29; 1 D. & B. Eq. 389; Baldw. 344; 15 Mass. 106; 139 id. 144; 7 Pet. 348; 37 Ill. App. 145; 93 Mich. 274; 112 Mo. 442. See 2 Washb. R. P. Appx.; Atherly, Marr. Settl. Such settlements are valid, the marriage being at law a valuable consideration; 42 S. W. Rep. (Tenn.) 213; 20 App. Div. N. Y. 560; and payments made in pursuance thereof cannot be set aside by creditors; 42 S. W. Rep. (Tenn.) 213. The property covered passes, on the death of the wife, to her devisees under the settlement; 20 App. Div. N. Y. 560; and is free from any claim by the husband to curtesy; 20 Misc. Rep. 481. It is sufficient to change the course of inheritance and authorize each party to dispose of his or her own property by deed or devise without consent of the other; 5 Kan. App. 341. See 42 Ia. 600. It is not affected by a subsequent statute respecting married women; 109 Ala. 689. In Quebec a gift of future property be- tween future consorts by marriage contrac is illegal and void; Rap. Jud. Quebec 11 С. S. 404. See ANTENUPTIAL CONTRACT.

MARRIAGE SETTLEMENTmain

Burrill's Law Dictionary • 1870

A settlement made by a husband out of his estate, before or after marriage, for the benefit of his wife, or of his wife and children. 2 Steph. Com. 307. 2 Kent's Com. 172-178.-A settlement in writing, usually made before marriage and in consideration of it, by which the estate of either or both of the parties is settled or limited to be enjoyed in a certain way; as upon the husband and issue, or upon the wife and issue, or upon the husband for life, remainder to the wife for life, remainder to the issue, or otherwise, as may be agreed upon. See Atherley on Marr. Settlements, 92, et seq. Mac Queen on Husb. & Wife, 257, et seq. MARSHAL, Mareschal. [Sc. marischall; L. Fr. mareshal, marescal, mariscal; L. Lat. marescallus, marascalcus; from Germ. marth, a horse, and schalt, an attendant.] In English law. The title of powers; as, The earl marshal, or lord mareschal, a high officer of state, who presided in the court of chivalry. 3 Bl. Com. 68. The marshal of the king's house, or knight marshal, whose special authority is in the king's palace, to hear and determine all pleas of the crown, and to punish faults committed within the verge, and to hear and judge of suits between those of the king's household. Holthouse. The marshal of the king's bench prison, who had the custody of that prison. Id. See Marescallus. In American law. The ministerial officer of the courts of the United States, with duties similar to those of a sheriff. 1 Kent's Com. 309. An officer with duties similar to those of a petty constable. *** The term marshal, though of later and humbler origin than constable, is derived essentially from the same source; marascalcus signifying an attendant upon horses, as comes stabuli (afterwards constabularius) denoted a superintendent of the stable. See Marescallus. Both titles seem to have risen in dignity by a similar progress, which Spelman has distinctly traced. When the comes stabuli was advanced to the rank of a military commander, the marescal (from his superior skill in the management of horses,) came to be employed in various military capacities; as to inspect the army, to select positions for encampment, to determine the array or order of battle, and finally to lead the van as commander of the cavalry. Rising into higher eminence, the marshal finally became an officer of the palace, charged with the protection of the sovereign's person and the preservation of the peace of the household, for which purpose he was allowed to hold a court, and at length became one of the great officers of state. It was at this period of its history that the office, with its title, was introduced into England by the Normans. Spelman, describing the office as it existed in England in his day, found traces of its original character subsisting in the circumstances that the earl marshal was entitled to receive from every person made a knight, a saddled palfrey, and that stray horses were among his perquisites. And see Fleta, lib. 2, c. 4, § 4; c. 5, § 8. No affinity, however, can be traced between

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

Subscribe Encyclopedia Sign In