Definition
Marriage consideration is the legal value supplied by a promise or act of marriage — that is, the mutual undertaking by two parties to marry each other — when that promise or act is given as the basis for a contract or conveyance. It arises most commonly in antenuptial (prenuptial) settlements, where one party conveys property or makes promises to the other in exchange for, or in contemplation of, the marriage itself.
In classical common law doctrine, marriage consideration occupied a unique and privileged position in the hierarchy of consideration. It was treated as the highest form of consideration known to the law — superior to money, services, or natural love and affection — because the courts regarded the institution of marriage as a matter of the gravest public and moral consequence. A conveyance or settlement supported by marriage consideration was therefore entitled to greater protection against challenge, particularly challenge by creditors of the settling party.
Two practical consequences flowed from this elevated status:
1. A voluntary settlement made in consideration of marriage could not ordinarily be set aside as a fraudulent conveyance against subsequent creditors, provided it was made before the marriage, in good faith, and in reasonable proportion to the settler's means. The marriage consideration "ran through" the entire settlement, protecting the husband, wife, and issue of the marriage as against those creditors.
2. A promise made in consideration of marriage was enforceable as a binding contract, provided the formal requirements for such agreements were satisfied — in England and many American states, the Statute of Frauds required such promises to be in writing.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): "Consideration" in ordinary English means careful thought, attention given to something, or a payment or reward. "Marriage" needs no gloss.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): "Consideration" is defined as "the act or process of considering; careful and deliberate thought" and, in legal usage, "the inducement to a contract; that which is given in exchange for a promise."
The gap between common and legal meaning is significant here in two directions. First, the ordinary reader hearing "marriage consideration" might understand it simply as thinking carefully about marriage — a purely informal phrase. In law, it is a term of art describing a specific type of legally cognizable consideration that triggers distinct doctrinal consequences. Second, even readers familiar with contract consideration may not appreciate that marriage consideration historically occupied a separate, privileged tier — it was not merely one valid form of consideration among equals, but the highest the law recognized.
---
Common Confusion
Marriage consideration is sometimes confused with "good consideration" (natural love and affection) or conflated generally with any contract touching marriage. The distinction matters. Good consideration — love and affection between near relations — was treated by the common law as legally insufficient to protect a voluntary conveyance against creditors. Marriage consideration, by contrast, was treated as valuable consideration of the highest order, placing settlements made upon it on equal or superior footing with settlements made for money. A deed reciting "natural love and affection" for a spouse was in a weaker position than a formal antenuptial settlement reciting the forthcoming marriage as its consideration.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers encounter marriage consideration most heavily in three documentary contexts: antenuptial settlement disputes, fraudulent conveyance litigation, and Statute of Frauds cases involving promises made in contemplation of marriage.
The chief trap in historical sources is the tendency of older decisions and treatises to treat marriage consideration as almost self-evidently the "highest" form of consideration without explaining why or under what limits. Rapalje & Lawrence's brief entry reflects this — the principle is stated as settled law without qualification. In practice, courts in both England and the United States applied significant limitations: the settlement had to be made before or in immediate pursuance of marriage (not after), it had to be proportionate to the settler's estate, and it could not be used to shield fraudulent intent against existing creditors. Later American decisions, particularly in equity, narrowed the doctrine considerably. Researchers working with 19th-century American materials should be alert to the fact that many states applied the doctrine inconsistently, and some effectively collapsed the distinction between marriage consideration and other valuable consideration as Statute of Frauds jurisprudence evolved.
The "runs through the whole settlement" language in Rapalje & Lawrence — protecting husband, wife, and issue — is important for understanding who qualifies as a protected party under such instruments. Issue (children of the marriage) were treated as meritorious claimants supported by the marriage consideration, even though they were not parties to the original agreement. This is a notable exception to ordinary privity principles and surfaces in inheritance and trust disputes involving family settlements.
For researchers tracing the doctrine into the 20th century: as formal antenuptial settlements became less common and modern prenuptial agreement law developed under statute, the specific privileged status of marriage consideration largely dissolved. Modern prenuptial agreements are assessed under their own statutory frameworks, not the classical consideration hierarchy.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Both Black's and Rapalje & Lawrence agree on the essential proposition — marriage consideration is the highest consideration known to law — and neither entry qualifies or explains the limits of the doctrine. Black's entry is a single sentence; Rapalje & Lawrence adds the important operational detail that the consideration "runs through the whole settlement" to protect husband, wife, and issue, and connects the doctrine to antenuptial articles and settlements specifically.
What both entries miss: the conditions that could defeat the protection (fraud on existing creditors, post-marriage timing, disproportionate settlements), the Statute of Frauds dimension for oral promises to marry, and the American jurisdictional variation in applying the doctrine. Neither source addresses the doctrine's gradual decline in equity jurisprudence. Researchers relying on these entries alone will have an accurate but incomplete — and optimistic — picture of how courts actually applied marriage consideration in contested cases.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The doctrine was fully developed in English equity and carried into American common law, but American courts applied it with varying degrees of fidelity. Some states, particularly those with codified fraudulent conveyance statutes, effectively treated marriage consideration as one form of valuable consideration rather than a uniquely privileged class. The Statute of Frauds dimension — requiring written evidence of promises made in consideration of marriage — also varied by state enactment.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Contracts — Adequacy of Consideration and Nominal Consideration (The Law Mind Contracts & Commercial Law Encyclopedia)
Family Law — Marriage: Proxy Marriage and Marriage by Estoppel (The Law Mind Family Law Encyclopedia)
---