Definition
"Maritusb" does not appear to be a recognized legal term. The entry in Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) associated with this label yields no substantive definition — only a fragment of citation text referencing several federal district court cases. This suggests one of two possibilities: (1) the term is a typographical or OCR-corrupted rendering of a legitimate Latin or legal term, most likely MARITUS (Latin: husband), which appears in civil law and historical common law sources as the standard designation for a husband in the context of marital rights and obligations; or (2) the source material reflects a database or scanning artifact rather than a discrete dictionary headword.
If the intended term is MARITUS, it refers in the civil law tradition to a husband — the male party to a valid marriage — particularly in contexts addressing marital property, the husband's legal authority over a wife's person or property, and obligations arising from the marital relationship. Roman and civil law treatises use maritus in contrast to uxor (wife) when defining the mutual duties and legal incidents of marriage.
---
Common Confusion
Do not confuse MARITUS with MARITAGIUM. Maritus designates the person (the husband); maritagium designates the property — specifically, the gift or portion given with a woman upon marriage. The two terms appear together frequently in feudal land law and dowry contexts, which increases the risk of conflation in historical sources.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers encountering "maritusb" in a digitized legal database should treat it as a data quality flag rather than a substantive term. OCR errors in digitized historical law books frequently corrupt Latin headwords, especially when ligatures, abbreviations, or small typefaces are involved. The trailing "b" is consistent with a scanning artifact from a page where the headword ran into an adjacent character or pagination mark.
If your research concern is the civil law concept of maritus (husband), be aware that historical dictionaries — including Black's 2nd Ed. — often grouped marital-status terms (maritus, uxor, dos, maritagium) in proximity, which can compound OCR confusion in digitized corpora. When navigating the Law Mind corpus for material on a husband's legal identity, spousal property rights, or the doctrine of coverture, search under MARITUS, COVERTURE, HUSBAND AND WIFE, and MARITAGIUM rather than this corrupted form.
The case fragments appearing in the source material (Holmes v. Oregon & C. Ry. Co., In re Long Island Transp. Co., U.S. v. Burlington Ferry Co.) are federal district court cases touching admiralty and transportation law — their appearance under this headword is almost certainly a digitization misalignment, where citation text from an adjacent entry was captured under the wrong headword label.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) provides no usable definition under this headword — only orphaned citation text. No synthesis with other shelf sources is possible for "maritusb" as a standalone term. The citations present (5 Fed. 77; 5 Fed. 606; 21 Fed. 336) are real federal reporters from the early 1880s and concern admiralty and corporate transportation matters, not marital law, reinforcing the conclusion that the source material is corrupted.
Historical dictionaries that do treat maritus as a proper entry — including Bouvier's Law Dictionary and civil law glossaries — define it consistently as the husband in a lawful marriage, with particular attention to the husband's rights of administration over marital property under both Roman law and early American common law. These sources should be consulted directly for substantive research on the concept.
---