Definition
Maritima Anglie (Latin: "the maritimes of England") refers to the revenues, profits, and emoluments historically collected by the English Crown from the sea and maritime activities. These included dues, forfeitures, and other income arising from the sea and its uses — wreck, flotsam, jetsam, lagan, fishing royalties, and similar maritime perquisites falling within royal prerogative. The term describes both the category of these revenues and, by extension, the jurisdictional claim underlying their collection.
---
Common Confusion
Maritima Anglie is sometimes conflated with the broader jurisdiction of the Admiral or Admiralty. The distinction matters: Maritima Anglie refers specifically to the revenue stream and the royal proprietary claim over maritime profits, while Admiralty jurisdiction is the broader judicial and administrative authority over maritime affairs. The Crown's maritime revenues were eventually subsumed within Admiralty administration, which may explain the conflation in older sources, but the two concepts have distinct origins.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This term appears almost exclusively in medieval and early modern English legal sources. Researchers working in pre-Tudor or Tudor-era materials on royal prerogative, maritime law, or Admiralty jurisdiction will encounter it; it is effectively absent from modern legal writing.
The key historical transition to track is administrative: Bouvier notes that Maritima Anglie revenues were originally collected by sheriffs — placing them within the ordinary apparatus of local Crown administration — before being granted to the Lord High Admiral. This shift reflects the broader 13th- and 14th-century consolidation of maritime authority into the Admiral's office and is directly relevant to research tracing the origins of English Admiralty jurisdiction. Researchers should not assume that a reference to Maritima Anglie in a medieval source implies Admiralty jurisdiction; the sheriff-based collection phase predates that institutional development.
The parliamentary reference in Bouvier (Par. 8 Hen. III. m. 4 — a membrane reference to a Parliament Roll of Henry III) anchors the term in 13th-century administrative practice. Researchers should treat this citation carefully: Henry III's reign (1216–1272) predates the formal institution of the Lord High Admiral, which emerged in the late 13th and early 14th centuries. The membrane reference points to chancery or exchequer roll records, and researchers pursuing primary sources should look to the Patent Rolls, Close Rolls, and Pipe Rolls of the relevant period rather than later Admiralty records.
Jurisdictional questions surrounding the sea and tidal waters were heavily contested throughout the medieval and early modern periods. Maritima Anglie sits at the intersection of Crown prerogative, local administration, and emergent Admiralty authority. It is a useful index term when researching the prerogative rights of wreck, royal fish, and the foreshore — all of which drew on the same underlying claim of Crown dominion over the sea.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Bouvier's Law Dictionary provides the only substantive entry among the shelf sources, defining Maritima Anglie as the profits and emoluments received by the king from the sea, noting the sheriff-to-Admiral administrative transfer with a specific roll citation. The entry is brief but structurally precise in identifying both the revenue character of the term and its administrative history.
No other standard historical legal dictionaries in the Law Mind corpus — Jacob's Law Dictionary, Tomlin's Law Dictionary, or Blount's Nomo-Lexicon — appear to carry a dedicated entry. This absence is itself informative: the term had likely faded from active legal usage by the time most standard dictionaries were compiled, surviving as a historical reference rather than a working term of art. Researchers should not expect to find Maritima Anglie in 18th- or 19th-century practice materials except in antiquarian or historical treatments of Admiralty law.
Bouvier's citation to Par. 8 Hen. III. m. 4 is specific enough to be verifiable but should be approached with the caution appropriate to secondary citation of medieval roll records — transcription and reference conventions varied considerably across centuries of legal writing.
---
Jurisdictional Note
This term is specific to English law and has no recognized equivalent in Scots law or in the civil law traditions that shaped Admiralty doctrine in continental Europe. It has no operative meaning in modern United States law, though it may appear in historical scholarship on the reception of English Admiralty jurisdiction in American courts.
---