Definition
In old English law, "manurable" describes property capable of being physically held, occupied, or worked by hand — that is, tangible, corporeal, and capable of manual cultivation or use. The term carried a cluster of related meanings that collectively distinguished physically graspable things from incorporeal rights or interests.
The core idea is that manurable things are those with a physical, material existence that a person can possess directly: land that can be tilled, objects that can be touched, property that admits of bodily occupation. Sir Matthew Hale's formulation — cited consistently across the historical dictionaries — captures this directly: "Corporeal things are such as are manurable."
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Able or suitable to be manured or cultivated.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Capable of cultivation; capable of receiving a fertilizing substance.
The common meaning of "manurable" has narrowed to the agricultural sense — land fit to receive fertilizer or to be farmed. The legal meaning is broader and more abstract. In legal usage, the term is not primarily about agricultural capacity but about corporeal, tangible existence as a property characteristic. A stone, a chattel, or a parcel of land could all be "manurable" in the legal sense not because they can be farmed but because they can be physically held and occupied. Researchers encountering the term in legal sources should not assume an agricultural context.
---
Common Confusion
"Manurable" shares a root with "manure" in its older sense (from the Latin manuoperare, to work by hand), not the modern sense of fertilizer. This creates a false-friend problem: modern readers naturally read "manurable" as meaning "fit to be fertilized," when in legal sources it means "fit to be held or worked by hand" — that is, corporeal or tangible. The two meanings overlap in the case of cultivable land but diverge entirely for movable goods and other tangible property. The agricultural connotation in Webster's 1913 is already a partial narrowing from the broader legal sense; in contemporary usage the agricultural narrowing is complete.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This term is a period marker. It appears in early English legal texts and commentary — predominantly pre-18th century — and is not live usage in modern law. Researchers will encounter it in readings of Hale, early property treatises, and older editions of legal dictionaries, but not in modern statutes, cases, or secondary sources.
The research trap is the fertilizer false-friend problem described above. Any passage using "manurable" in a legal context to describe property is making a statement about corporeality and tangibility, not agricultural use. Misreading it produces a fundamentally wrong understanding of what the author is distinguishing.
The term matters most in the context of the corporeal/incorporeal property distinction, which is foundational to understanding how early English law categorized things. When Hale draws the line between corporeal and incorporeal things, "manurable" is his shorthand for the corporeal side of that divide. Researchers tracing the history of intangible property rights, easements, profits à prendre, or the classification of property in equity will encounter this usage and need to recognize it correctly.
Burrill's entry is the most expansive of the three dictionary sources and supplies the Hale quotation in context, which is useful for researchers who want to trace the precise passage. The Black's editions (1st and 2nd) carry identical definitions, indicating no editorial evolution between them on this point.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
All three source dictionaries agree closely. Black's (1st and 2nd editions) and Burrill's all define the term by the same cluster of meanings — capable of being held in hand, capable of manual occupation, capable of cultivation, capable of being touched, tangible, corporeal — and all trace the authority to Hale's Analogy, section 24.
Burrill adds the most context, supplying the direct Hale quotation ("Corporeal things are such as are manurable") and flagging the derivation from "manure" in its older hand-working sense. This is helpful for understanding why the term ever had this meaning — the root is manual labor and hand-possession, not fertilization.
What the historical dictionaries do not address is how "manurable" relates to the broader property taxonomy it supports. The dictionaries define the word but do not situate it within the Hale analytical framework or trace how that framework influenced later property law. For that context, researchers need to go to Hale's Analogy directly or to secondary historical scholarship on early English property classification.
None of the dictionaries suggest the term was ever used outside old English law contexts, and none suggest it survived into modern usage as a live legal term.
---
Jurisdictional Note
"Manurable" is a term of old English law with no surviving jurisdictional currency. It does not appear as a term of art in American, Canadian, or modern English legal usage. Researchers will only encounter it in historical English sources.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Law Mind Encyclopedia: Land; Property, Corporeal; Property, Incorporeal
---