Definition
Mainable is an archaic legal term with two distinct senses found in historical sources:
1. Amenable; subject to legal process or authority. In this sense, a person or thing described as mainable is one that can be called to account, compelled to answer, or brought within the reach of legal obligation.
2. Distrainable; subject to distraint. In this sense, mainable describes property or goods that may lawfully be seized as security for an obligation or in satisfaction of a claim.
The term is obsolete in modern legal usage and appears only in historical legal materials, primarily of Anglo-Norman and early English origin.
---
Common Confusion
Mainable is easily confused with the related term MAYHEM (also rendered in historical sources as maihem, mahem, or maim) because Burrill's Law Dictionary places the two in close proximity and shares common root forms. They are entirely distinct concepts. Mainable concerns legal amenability or susceptibility to distraint. Mayhem concerns the criminal offense of disabling a person's capacity for self-defense by depriving them of the use of a bodily member. A researcher encountering either term in a historical source should confirm which concept the document addresses before proceeding.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers working in early English law, Anglo-Norman legal records, or colonial American materials may encounter mainable in contexts involving obligations, feudal tenure, or enforcement proceedings. The term signals one of two things: either that a party is subject to jurisdiction or compulsion (the amenability sense), or that specific goods or land are available for seizure under a distress proceeding (the distrainability sense).
The primary research trap is the proximity of mainable to mayhem in historical dictionaries. Burrill's entry moves directly from the definition of mainable into an extended treatment of mayhem, and the typographical conventions of older printed dictionaries can make the boundary between entries unclear. A researcher scanning quickly may absorb the mayhem definition while thinking they are reading about mainable, or vice versa.
A second trap involves the word amenable, which Burrill uses to gloss the first sense of mainable. In modern usage, amenable carries a mild sense of willingness or responsiveness. In the historical legal context, amenable means something stronger and more compulsory: subject to legal authority, bound to respond, not exempt from process. Researchers should read mainable in its coercive, not its cooperative, sense.
Because mainable appears in Law French materials, spelling variants should be anticipated. The term may be rendered in manuscript or early print sources in forms that are difficult to recognize without familiarity with Law French orthographic conventions.
The distrainability sense connects mainable directly to the law of distress, a body of law with its own substantial vocabulary and procedural complexity. Researchers who identify mainable as signaling distrainability should move immediately into the distress framework to understand what followed in practice.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Burrill's Law Dictionary is the principal source available for this term, and its entry is brief. Burrill glosses mainable as "amenable; distrainable" and cites Kelham's dictionary of Norman-French as authority. This is consistent with the term's Law French origins and its use in feudal and procedural contexts.
Burrill does not elaborate on the two senses separately or provide illustrative examples. The entry's brevity reflects the term's status even by the mid-nineteenth century: it was already a recognized archaism, useful for reading historical sources but not in active legal deployment.
No substantive treatment of mainable appears in the standard common law treatise tradition, and the term does not appear to have generated significant doctrinal commentary. Its value is primarily as a key to unlock meaning in older documents rather than as a concept with independent analytical weight.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Mainable is specific to the English common law tradition and its Law French inheritance. It does not have a recognized counterpart in civil law jurisdictions. In American legal materials, the term would appear only in sources drawing directly on English precedent or in early colonial documents modeled on English forms.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
See Law Mind Encyclopedia: Mayhem (for the adjacent criminal law concept with which this term is frequently confused in historical sources); Distress and Distraint (for the substantive law governing seizure of goods to which the distrainability sense of mainable connects).
---