MAGNA ASSISA ELIGENDA

4 definitions found across Law Mind sources

MAGNA ASSISA ELIGENDAAuthored
The Law Mind • 768 words
Definition
A Latin writ of medieval English procedure, translating roughly as "for the great assize to be chosen." The writ directed the summoning of four lawful knights before the justices of assize, whose function was to select twelve additional knights — together forming the grand assize, or great jury — to try a matter of right in a land dispute. The grand assize decided questions of title to freehold land and stood as a formal alternative to trial by battle (judicial combat) in proceedings on a writ of right. The writ and the institution it summoned were abolished by 3 & 4 William IV, c. 27 (1833), the statute that swept away a broad range of archaic real property procedures.
Why It Matters in Research
This term belongs almost exclusively to the historical record of English real property law and medieval civil procedure. Researchers will encounter it in pre-nineteenth-century materials on writs of right and land title disputes, not in any surviving practice. Its primary significance today is contextual: understanding it illuminates the broader transition from proof by ordeal and combat to proof by jury in English law, a transition Henry II's reforms in the twelfth century largely drove. Several navigational traps appear in the sources. First, Rapalje & Lawrence cross-references the variant form DE MAGNA ASSISA ELIGENDA — researchers should search both forms in historical digests, as the de- prefix version appears in writ registers and procedural manuals with roughly equal frequency. Second, the Black's first edition entry retrieved here is misattributed in the source data: the text provided (concerning Magna Charta and the Charter of the Forest) belongs to a different entry entirely and should not be relied upon as authority for this term. The second edition entry is the operative source. Third, do not conflate the grand assize (magna assisa) with the grand jury. They share a Latin structural ancestor and similar numerical composition but served entirely different legal functions in entirely different proceedings. For corpus researchers working in English legal history, the relevant cluster of terms includes writ of right, grand assize, petty assize, and the assizes of novel disseisin and mort d'ancestor — all products of the Angevin legal reforms that reshaped land law in the late twelfth century. The abolition statute (3 & 4 Wm. IV, c. 27) is also the instrument that abolished the writ of right itself, so references to that statute in historical commentary will frequently appear alongside discussion of this writ.
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) provides the most complete and accurate entry among the surveyed sources, citing Wharton for the institutional background and correctly identifying the abolition statute. Its description of the writ's mechanism — four knights summoned to choose twelve more — matches the account in Glanvill's twelfth-century treatise on English law, which is the earliest detailed description of the grand assize as Henry II's parliamentary institution. Rapalje & Lawrence's entry is not independently useful; it redirects to DE MAGNA ASSISA ELIGENDA and the text retrieved alongside it (describing a Scottish execution device called the maiden) belongs to an entirely different entry — a corruption in the source data that researchers should disregard. The first edition Black's entry, as noted above, appears to be a data error returning text from a Magna Charta entry. It carries no weight for this term. None of the historical dictionaries surveyed situate the writ within Glanvill's account or the broader historiography of Angevin legal reform. Researchers needing substantive historical depth should consult Pollock and Maitland's History of English Law and Maitland's own work on the forms of action, which remain the standard secondary authorities on the grand assize and its procedural context.
Jurisdictional Note
This writ is specific to the English common law tradition and has no counterpart in American law. It was abolished before the American legal system had occasion to receive or adapt it. Researchers in Scottish or colonial legal history will not find this writ operative in those jurisdictions.
Related Terms
DE MAGNA ASSISA ELIGENDA — variant writ form; cross-search required in historical sources GRAND ASSIZE — the jury institution this writ summoned WRIT OF RIGHT — the proceeding in which the grand assize operated PETTY ASSIZE — related family of assizes; functionally distinct NOVEL DISSEISIN — the petty assize most frequently compared to the grand assize TRIAL BY BATTLE — the alternative this writ was designed to displace ASSISA — parent term for the assize family of writs and proceedings WRIT — procedural parent concept
MAGNA ASSISA ELIGENDAmain
Black's Law Dictionary • 1891
An Magna Charta et Charta de Foresta sont appelès les "deux grandes char- ters." 2 Inst. 570. Magna Charta and the Charter of the Forest are called the "two great charters."
MAGNA ASSISA ELIGENDAmain
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) • 1910
An ancient writ to summon four lawful knights before the justices of assize, there to choose twelve others, with themselves to constitute the grand assize or great jury, to try the matter of right. The trial by grand assize was instituted by Henry IL in parliament, as an alternative to the duel in a writ of right. Abolished by 3 & 4 Wm. IV. ec. 27. Wharton.
MAGNA ASSISA ELIGENDAmain
Rapalje & Lawrence • 1883
See DE MAGNA ASSISA ELIGENDA. feet high, with a groove on each side for it to slide in. The prisoner's neck being fastened to a bar underneath, and the sign given, the maiden was let loose, and the head severed from the body. The prototype of the guillotine.- Whar-

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In