Definition
"Live" appears in legal texts in several distinct senses, and the applicable meaning depends heavily on context:
1. To be alive; to survive. In wills and devises, "living" at the testator's death is a condition of taking under a gift. The question of whether a beneficiary was alive at the moment of the testator's death — including whether a child born after death but conceived before (en ventre sa mère) qualifies — has generated substantial case law. Courts have treated "living" in this context as a legal status, not merely a biological one.
2. To reside or dwell. In property and family law contexts, "lives" or "living" may describe habitual residence or domicile. Courts have sometimes distinguished between a casual or occasional presence and the sustained occupation required by phrases like "the farm on which F. now lives."
3. To cohabit; to live together. In domestic relations and adultery statutes, "living together" implies something more than occasional contact — it denotes a continuous domestic arrangement.
4. As a modifier in compound legal terms. "Live animals," "live stock," and "living will" each carry specific meanings that have been the subject of judicial construction, sometimes producing results that diverge from ordinary expectation.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Of an event, as it happens; in real time; direct. Also, of a performance or speech, delivered in person.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): To be alive; to have life; to have, as an animal or a plant, the capacity of assimilating matter as food, and to be dependent on such assimilation for a continuance of existence.
The common meaning of "live" most relevant to legal texts is the Webster's biological sense — being alive — and the spatial sense of residing somewhere. The modern broadcast meaning (real-time, in-person) is largely absent from classical legal usage but has become relevant in procedural contexts such as live testimony, live hearings, and broadcasting restrictions. A researcher reading historical sources should not import the broadcast-era meaning into older instruments.
---
Common Confusion
"Live" as used in a devise or bequest is not synonymous with "domiciled." A person may be "living" somewhere in the sense of occupying and working a farm without being legally domiciled there. Courts have had to decide which sense a testator intended, and the results are not uniform. Similarly, "living together" in domestic relations statutes is not the same as being married, cohabiting in a purely contractual sense, or merely sharing an address. The phrase carries a relational and continuous-conduct element that bare physical co-presence does not.
"Live animals" and "live stock" are not coextensive. Courts construed "live animals" broadly enough to include singing birds, while "live stock" was held not to encompass live fowls — distinctions that matter in customs, insurance, and commercial law.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The word "live" is deceptively simple and carries significant interpretive weight in several research contexts.
In wills and estates research, "living" as a survival condition is one of the most litigated words in testamentary instruments. Researchers should look for how the relevant jurisdiction handles simultaneous death, the unborn child problem, and whether "living" is treated as requiring survival for some period beyond the testator's death. The meaning has been refined by statute in many jurisdictions through simultaneous death acts and the Uniform Probate Code, so historical case law may not reflect current doctrine.
In domestic relations research, "living together" and related phrases track the evolution of cohabitation doctrine, adultery law, and common-law marriage recognition. These terms appear in statutes that have been repealed, amended, or reinterpreted over time. What "living together" required to prove adultery in the nineteenth century may differ significantly from what cohabitation statutes require today.
In property and commercial law, compound uses — "live stock," "live animals," "living trust" — each have independent interpretive histories. The judicial constructions noted by Bouvier (birds as live animals; fowls excluded from live stock) are products of specific customs and tariff contexts and should not be treated as universally applicable definitions.
In constitutional research, "living" appears in the phrase "living Constitution" or "living constitutionalism," a major interpretive theory. This usage is entirely modern and methodological, not a term of art from historical sources.
"Living will" is a term of art in health law and estates practice, designating an advance directive expressing a person's wishes regarding life-sustaining treatment. It is unrelated to the testamentary meaning of "living" and should be researched through health law and advance directive sources rather than will construction doctrine.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Anderson and Bouvier together illustrate how courts have been called upon to pin down the meaning of an ordinary English word when it appears in legal instruments.
Anderson addresses two distinct problems: first, whether "lives" in a devise means dwelling/residing or merely subsisting/obtaining a livelihood; second, whether a child en ventre sa mère is "living" for purposes of taking under a devise. Both are well-established areas of construction, and Anderson's brief treatment is a useful pointer, not a full analysis.
Bouvier's entries on "live animals" and "live stock" reflect the customs and commercial law context of the late nineteenth century. The holdings he cites — birds as live animals, fowls outside live stock — are jurisdiction-specific and era-specific and should be verified against current commercial and regulatory definitions before being applied.
Neither source addresses the domestic relations dimension of "living together" in any depth. Researchers working in that area will need to supplement these entries with case law and statutory materials directly.
Neither source addresses "living will," "living trust," or "living constitutionalism" — all of which are twentieth-century coinages that postdate these dictionaries entirely.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The interpretation of "living" as a survival condition in wills is governed by state law and has been significantly affected by the Uniform Simultaneous Death Act and the Uniform Probate Code, which many states have adopted in whole or in part. The common-law presumption and the statutory treatment may differ, and not all states have adopted the same version of uniform acts. Researchers should confirm which regime applies in the relevant jurisdiction before relying on older case law.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Advance Directives — Living Wills and Health Care Proxies (Law Mind Trusts, Estates & Probate Encyclopedia)
Constitutional Interpretation — Originalism, Textualism, and Living Constitutionalism (Law Mind Constitutional Law Encyclopedia)
Organ Transplantation Law — NOTA, UNOS Allocation, and Living Donor Protections (Law Mind Health Law & Bioethics Encyclopedia)
---