Definition
Lex Cornelia (Latin: "the Cornelian law") refers collectively to a set of Roman statutes enacted by the dictator Lucius Cornelius Sulla (c. 82–79 BCE) that established civil and criminal remedies for injuries to persons and property. In Roman legal sources, the term most commonly appears in two specific contexts:
1. Lex Cornelia (general): A statute providing remedies for personal injuries, including battery and the forcible entry of another's dwelling. It functioned as one of the foundational instruments of Roman private delict law, giving the injured party a legal action where previously only customary or praetorian remedies may have applied.
2. Lex Cornelia de Falso: The Cornelian law on forgery and falsification. This statute criminalized the fraudulent alteration of wills, documents, weights, and measures, and the use of false seals. It is treated as a distinct enactment in the Digest (D. 48.10) and is the more frequently cited of the two in Roman legal scholarship.
---
Common Confusion
Lex Cornelia is sometimes treated in secondary sources as a single law, but it is more accurately a family of statutes. Sulla enacted multiple leges Corneliae during his dictatorship on subjects ranging from judicial procedure to criminal law. When historical legal dictionaries cite Lex Cornelia without further qualification, they typically mean the general personal-injury statute; when scholars of Roman criminal law cite it, they almost always mean the Lex Cornelia de Falso. A researcher encountering the unqualified term should determine from context which enactment is meant before drawing conclusions about its scope or application.
---
Recognized Forms
/SUBTYPES
Lex Cornelia (general): Addressed battery, personal violence, and forcible intrusion upon another's premises. The source of a civil action in Roman law analogous to later common-law trespass to the person and trespass to land.
Lex Cornelia de Falso: Addressed forgery and falsification in its several forms — false wills, counterfeit documents, false testimony, and fraudulent use of seals or weights. Codified at Digest 48.10 in Justinian's compilation and treated by the Roman jurists as a significant criminal statute (lex publica).
---
Why It Matters in Research
For researchers working in the Law Mind corpus, Lex Cornelia appears primarily in two research contexts:
First, in treatments of Roman law foundations of common-law torts. Nineteenth-century American and English legal scholars frequently traced the ancestry of battery, assault, and forcible entry back to the Cornelian law when arguing for the antiquity or universality of a legal principle. If a source invokes Lex Cornelia as precedent or analogy, it is making a civilian argument — one grounded in Roman law rather than English common law. Recognizing this framing prevents misreading the citation as a binding authority.
Second, in forgery and documentary fraud materials. The Lex Cornelia de Falso is a significant reference point in comparative criminal law discussions of forgery, particularly in treatises and encyclopedias addressing what acts constitute criminal falsification. Researchers tracing the development of forgery doctrine will find the Digest reference (D. 48.10) cited across multiple historical sources and should be aware that the Digest's treatment synthesizes commentary from several jurists and may not represent a single, uniform rule.
Practical trap: The historical dictionaries reproduce one another closely on this term. Bouvier's entry is nearly verbatim from Rapalje & Lawrence, and neither adds independent analysis. Black's cites "Calvin" (Johannes Calvinus's Lexicon Juridicum, a 17th-century civilian dictionary), signaling that the entry derives from continental civilian scholarship rather than English common-law sources. Researchers seeking depth on Roman law content should move directly to Justinian's Digest rather than relying on the historical dictionary entries, which are thin summaries.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The three shelf dictionaries present a consistent but minimal account. Black's Law Dictionary identifies the enactor (L. Cornelius Sylla), notes battery and forcible entry as covered injuries, and cites Calvin's Lexicon — useful as a pointer to its civilian source but not analytically developed. Rapalje & Lawrence adds the important distinction of the Lex Cornelia de Falso as a separate enactment and supplies the Digest citation (D. 48.10), which is the most substantively useful piece of information in any of the three entries. Bouvier reproduces Rapalje & Lawrence without attribution and without addition.
None of the historical dictionaries addresses the broader Sullan legislative program, the procedural mechanism by which the law operated in Roman courts, or the reception of Roman forgery doctrine in later civil law systems. For these questions, the Digest itself and modern Roman law scholarship are the appropriate sources.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Lex Cornelia is Roman law and has no direct operative force in any common-law jurisdiction. Its relevance in English-speaking legal research is historical and comparative — as a cited ancestor of tort or criminal doctrines, or as background in civil-law influenced jurisdictions (Louisiana, Quebec, South Africa) where Roman law retained more structural influence.
---