Definition
Legatine constitutions are a body of ecclesiastical legislation enacted in England during the thirteenth century under the authority of papal legates. They were promulgated in national synods convened by two successive legates of the Roman Church: Cardinal Otho, acting under Pope Gregory IX, around 1220 (formally 1237), and Cardinal Othobon, acting under Pope Clement IV, around 1268. Together, these two sets of constitutions formed a significant layer of canon law operative within the English church, sitting alongside the general law of Rome and the provincial constitutions of Canterbury and York.
The legatine constitutions were not merely advisory. They carried binding force within the English ecclesiastical courts and governed a wide range of matters including clerical discipline, church courts procedure, the administration of sacraments, and the ordering of cathedral and parish life. Glosses and commentaries were subsequently written on both sets by English canonists, giving them a secondary literature comparable to that attached to the principal texts of Roman canon law.
Although their direct legal force diminished after the English Reformation severed the jurisdiction of the papacy over the English church, the legatine constitutions retained historical significance as foundational documents of pre-Reformation English ecclesiastical law, and portions of their substantive content were absorbed into or superseded by the Elizabethan and later ecclesiastical settlement.
___
Why It Matters in Research
This term is almost exclusively a pre-Reformation ecclesiastical law term and appears most heavily in sources dealing with medieval English church governance, canon law practice, and the history of ecclesiastical courts. Researchers will encounter legatine constitutions primarily in three contexts: histories of the English church before 1534, treatises on ecclesiastical jurisdiction, and commentary on the sources of English canon law.
The most significant navigational trap is temporal. Blackstone's Commentaries, which Burrill cites for this entry, presents the legatine constitutions in the context of explaining the historical layering of laws operative in England — they appear not as living law but as historical precedent. Any research relying on this term must establish whether the source in question treats the constitutions as binding authority (a pre-Reformation posture) or as historical artifact (post-Reformation and modern).
The two sets — Otho's (sometimes dated 1237, the date of the London synod, rather than 1220) and Othobon's (1268) — are frequently cited together but were enacted over thirty years apart under different pontiffs and addressed somewhat different concerns. Conflating them produces analytical errors when examining specific disciplinary questions.
The legatine constitutions also connect directly to the broader question of what sources of law English ecclesiastical courts recognized before the Reformation, alongside the Gregorian Decretals, the Clementines, and the provincial constitutions. Researchers working in this space should expect to encounter all of these together and need a map of their relative authority.
Post-Reformation, the canonical fate of these constitutions is unsettled. The Submission of the Clergy (1532) and subsequent Henrician legislation did not uniformly repeal prior canon law; much of it continued in force to the extent it was not repugnant to royal prerogative or English law, a principle that kept portions of pre-Reformation canonical texts operative for considerable time.
___
Historical Dictionary Support
Burrill's entry is brief but accurate in its essentials. He correctly identifies the two legates (Otho and Othobon), the sponsoring pontiffs (Gregory IX and Clement IV), and the reign in which both synods occurred (Henry III). His dates — "about the years 1220 and 1268" — reflect the period of the legations broadly rather than the precise synodal dates; the principal Otho synod is generally fixed to 1237 in London, while Othobon's work culminated at the 1268 Council of London.
Burrill appends a separate Latin entry — Ληγάτον — for the civilian term for legacy (legatum), which is etymologically related but legally unconnected to legatine constitutions. This juxtaposition in the original dictionary is potentially misleading for researchers scanning entries; the two terms are entirely distinct in meaning and application.
Blackstone's Commentaries, the authority Burrill cites, provides the most accessible classical English legal treatment of the legatine constitutions. Blackstone situates them as one component of a composite body of laws governing the English church, noting their enactment in national synods and their subsequent role in ecclesiastical courts. Blackstone's framing is descriptive-historical rather than doctrinal, consistent with the late eighteenth-century posture toward pre-Reformation canonical sources generally.
No single historical law dictionary provides comprehensive coverage of the legatine constitutions as legal instruments. Researchers seeking fuller treatment must move from general legal dictionaries to specialized histories of English canon law and ecclesiastical court practice.
___
Jurisdictional Note
The legatine constitutions are specific to England and had no direct operative effect in other jurisdictions, including the broader universal church, where they carried no authority beyond the English province. Scotland, Ireland, and continental ecclesiastical courts were not governed by these instruments. Their residual legal relevance, if any, is confined to the Church of England and questions of historical English ecclesiastical law.
___