Definition
Jus patronatus (Latin: "right of the patron") is a term from English ecclesiastical law with two closely related meanings.
1. The right of patronage — specifically, the right to present a clerk (a qualified clergyman) to a bishop for appointment to a vacant benefice (a church office with attached income). This right attached to land or a family by grant, custom, or founding of the church and could be bought, inherited, and litigated.
2. A formal ecclesiastical commission or inquest — convened by the bishop when two competing parties each submit a presentment to the same vacancy (called an "avoidance"). The bishop issues a commission, typically to his chancellor and other learned persons, who then empanel a jury of six clergymen and six laymen to examine the evidence and determine which claimant holds the rightful patronage. This proceeding is classified as an inquest of office.
The two meanings are functionally linked: the commission (meaning 2) is the procedural mechanism used to resolve disputes over the substantive right (meaning 1).
---
Common Confusion
Jus patronatus is frequently encountered alongside related terms — advowson, right of presentation, and right of patronage — and researchers can conflate them. Advowson is the property right itself, the incorporeal hereditament that runs with land. Jus patronatus names the legal right inherent in that ownership (the right to present), and also names the inquest convened when that right is contested. In other words, advowson is the thing owned; jus patronatus is the right it confers and the proceeding that vindicates it. A patron exercising an advowson exercises a jus patronatus; if the exercise is disputed, a jus patronatus commission resolves it.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers encounter jus patronatus most often in two contexts: ecclesiastical law treatises and common law property disputes over advowsons. Several navigational points matter.
First, the term appears in sources across a wide chronological range — from medieval canon law texts through Victorian ecclesiastical law treatises such as Phillimore's Ecclesiastical Law — and its meaning is stable across that period. The ecclesiastical inquest form described in Blackstone (3 Bl. Comm. 246) survived well into the nineteenth century in England, so dating a source is less critical here than with many ecclesiastical terms.
Second, corpus researchers should note that jus patronatus almost never appears in American legal sources in its procedural sense (the inquest). The American separation of church and state eliminated the ecclesiastical court infrastructure that gave the commission its force. American references are therefore almost exclusively doctrinal or historical, citing the right-of-patronage meaning in the context of property law or church-state discussion.
Third, the Rapalje & Lawrence entry signals that jus patronatus can appear in abbreviated or fragmented form in older digests and reporters, sometimes noted simply as a "right of advc." (advowson) without spelling out the full term. Researchers searching for patronage disputes in historical ecclesiastical records may need to search on advowson, right of presentation, and patron concurrently.
Fourth, within the Law Mind corpus, this term functions as a bridge term: it connects the ecclesiastical law shelf (benefices, livings, advowsons, simony) with the property law shelf (incorporeal hereditaments, rights running with land, inquest of office). A trail that begins with jus patronatus often requires moving between both bodies of material.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The four source dictionaries are in substantial agreement. Black's (both editions), Rapalje & Lawrence, and Burrill all define jus patronatus as the right of patronage and the right of presenting a clerk to a benefice. All trace to English ecclesiastical law. Black's both editions add the procedural dimension — the commission from the bishop with the six-and-six jury — and cite Blackstone's Commentaries as the primary authority.
Rapalje & Lawrence is the most analytically precise of the four, explicitly distinguishing the two meanings (the substantive right and the inquest proceeding) and citing Phillimore's Ecclesiastical Law alongside Blackstone. This makes Rapalje & Lawrence the most useful entry for a researcher who needs to understand what happened procedurally in a disputed presentment.
Burrill's entry is the briefest, essentially defining the term as the right of patronage and the right of presenting a clerk, without reaching the inquest procedure. For a researcher needing only a quick identifier, Burrill suffices; for anyone working a disputed patronage case, Rapalje & Lawrence and Blackstone are the necessary next steps.
None of the historical dictionaries address the American context, which is expected — the underlying institutions did not take root in the United States.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Jus patronatus in its full procedural form (the bishop's commission and mixed jury) was an exclusively English ecclesiastical law institution. It has no operative American equivalent. In England, the framework persisted under statute into the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, though it was substantially reformed. Researchers working Scottish ecclesiastical records should be aware that Scottish law developed its own patronage controversy — the Disruption of 1843 arose from precisely such disputes — and while the terminology overlaps, the institutional and legal context differs from the English model.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
See Law Mind Encyclopedia: Advowson; Ecclesiastical Law; Incorporeal Hereditaments.
---