See NOTIO. causes. JURISDICTION (Lat. jus, law, dicere, to say). The authority by which judicial officers take cognizance of and decide 60 Vt. 618. The power to hear and determine a cause. 3 Ohio 494; 6 Pet. 709; 2 How. 338. The right of a judge to pronounce a sentence of the law, on a case or issue before him, acquired through due pro- cess of law. It includes power to enforce the execution of what is decreed. 9 Johns. 239; 8 Metc. Mass. 460; Thach. 202. The right to adjudicate concerning the subject-matter in the given case. To con- stitute this there are three essentials: First, the court must have cognizance of the class of cases to which the one to be adjudicated belongs; second, the proper parties must be present; and third, the point decided upon must be, in substance and effect, within the issue; 1 Black, Judg. § 242; 55 Ark. 200. Ancillary jurisdiction. Where one court of chancery entertains a bill in aid of a suit commenced in another chancery jurisdic- tion, both being designed to operate upon the same subject-matter or property right, but where the first suit is inadequate to give complete relief for want of territorial jurisdiction over the entire subject of liti- gation, the subsequent suits are said to be ancillary to the first. A familiar illustra- tion is a bill to foreclose a mortgage on a railroad passing through two or more states, in which ancillary bills are filed in states other than that in which the first suit is brought, without regard to the citi- zenship of the parties. Appellate jurisdiction is that given by appeal or writ of error from the judgment of another court. Assistant jurisdiction is that afforded by a court of chancery in aid of a court of law: as, for example, by a bill of discovery, or for the perpetuation of testimony, and the like. Auxiliary jurisdiction is another name given to this jurisdiction in aid of a court of law. Jurisdiction of the cause is the power over the subject-matter given by the laws of the sovereignty in which the tribunal exists. + Civil jurisdiction is that which exists when the subject-matter is not of a crimi- nal nature. Concurrent jurisdiction is that which is possessed over the same parties or subject- matter at the same time by two or more separate tribunals. Consultative jurisdiction. Where one court aids another by giving an opinion on a matter which the latter has under consid- eration the court which gives the opinion is said to exercise a consultative jurisdic- tion. 4 App. Cas. 30. Criminal jurisdiction is that which exists for the punishment of crimes. Exclusive jurisdiction is that which gives to one tribunal sole power to try the cause. General jurisdiction is that which ex- tends to a great variety of matters. Gener- al jurisdiction in law and equity is juris- diction of every kind that a court can pos- sess, of the person, subject-matter, terri- torial, and generally the power of the court in the discharge of its judicial duties. 63 Hun 367. Limited jurisdiction (called, also, special and inferior) is that which extends only to certain specified causes. Original jurisdiction is that bestowed upon a tribunal in the first instance. Jurisdiction of the person is that obtained by the appearance of the defendant before the tribunal. 9 Mass. 462. Territorial jurisdiction is the power of the tribunal considered with reference to the territory within which it is to be exer cised. 9 Mass. 462. Cooley speaks of "courts of general jurisdiction, by which is meant that their authority extends to a great variety of matters, while others are only of special and limited jurisdiction," that is, have authority extending only to certain spe- cified cases; Const. Lim., 5th ed. 502. The inferior federal courts, though of limited jurisdiction, are not technically inferior courts; 10 Wheat. 192. There are courts which are competent to decide on their own jurisdiction and to exercise it to a final judgment without setting forth in their proceedings the facts and evidence on which it is rendered, whose record is absolute verity, which can be questioned only in an appellate court; other courts are so constituted that their judgments "can be looked through for the facts and evi- dence which are necessary to sustain them," whose decisions are not evidence of themselves to show jurisdiction and its lawful exercise; 2 How. 341. Jurisdiction is given by the law; 22 Barb. 323; 3 Tex. 157; and cannot be conferred by consent of the parties; 5 Mich. 331; 28 Conn. 112; 2 Ohio St. 223; 23 Ala. N. S. 155; 34 Me. 223; 4 Cush. 27; 4 Gilm. 181; 6 Ired. 139; 4 Yerg. 579; 3 M'Cord 280; 13 Miss. 549; 32 N. E. Rep. (Ind.) 1025; 82 Wis. 644; 65 Hun 489; 52 Fed. Rep. 770; nor can silence or positive consent of parties confer on a fed- eral court jurisdiction denied by statute; 53 Fed. Rep. 18. Where the jurisdiction of a court as to the subject-matter is limited, the consent of parties cannot confer it; 91