JURISDICTIO

3 definitions found across Law Mind sources

JURISDICTIOAuthored
The Law Mind • 1004 words
Definition
The Latin root term for jurisdiction. In classical Roman law and medieval legal writing, jurisdictio denoted the formal authority to speak the law — to hear disputes, pronounce judgment, and administer justice between parties. It carried a technical meaning encompassing both the power to take cognizance of a cause and the right to enforce a determination once made. In old English legal usage, jurisdictio functioned as the Latin equivalent of the English term "jurisdiction," appearing in law Latin pleadings, writs, and scholarly treatises. It was not a vernacular term but rather the formal Latin designation for what modern courts and commentators call jurisdiction. Burrill's formulation captures the scope: jurisdictio is the authority to judge, or administer justice — specifically the power to determine actions between persons and things, whether that authority derives from ordinary (inherent) or delegated sources.
Common Confusion
JURISDICTIO vs. NOTIO: Bouvier's cross-references NOTIO as a related concept. In Roman law, notio was a narrower grant of authority — the power to investigate or inquire into a matter — without necessarily carrying the full adjudicative power implied by jurisdictio. A magistrate might possess notio to examine facts without holding full jurisdictio to render binding judgment. Researchers encountering either term in Roman law sources or medieval civil law texts should not treat them as interchangeable. JURISDICTIO vs. IMPERIUM: In Roman public law, jurisdictio was distinguished from imperium, the broader coercive executive power of a magistrate. Jurisdictio was the specifically judicial component — the power to say what the law is between parties. This distinction surfaces in civil law scholarship and occasionally in early American treatises borrowing from the civil law tradition.
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers will encounter jurisdictio primarily in three contexts: (1) law Latin passages in English common law pleadings and writs prior to the gradual displacement of Latin in English courts, completed legislatively in 1733; (2) civil law and Roman law scholarship, where the term retains its classical technical meaning; and (3) early American legal treatises and constitutional commentary that drew on both common law and civilian sources when theorizing the nature of judicial power. The practical trap is reading jurisdictio through a modern jurisdiction lens without accounting for the Roman law distinction between ordinary and delegated authority embedded in the classical definition. Burrill's definition expressly preserves this: authority derived "per auctoritatem ordinariam vel delegatam" — by ordinary or delegated authority. This distinction matters for understanding early doctrines about inferior courts, delegated judicial commissions, and the limits on what a court could do when exercising authority derived from statute versus inherent constitutional position. In the Law Mind corpus, the term will appear most frequently in historical dictionaries, civil law treatises, and annotated digests of Roman law. It is essentially absent from modern American judicial opinions, which use the anglicized "jurisdiction" exclusively. When the Latin form appears in a primary source, it is almost always a signal that the author is drawing on civil law or Roman law learning, or writing in a formal law Latin register that carries its own interpretive conventions. Bouvier's cross-reference to NOTIO is a useful navigational pointer: entries treating jurisdictio in Roman law sources typically develop alongside discussion of the various grades of magisterial authority, and following that thread in the corpus will yield the most complete picture of the classical concept.
Historical Dictionary Support
Bouvier and Burrill agree on the core: jurisdictio is the Latin source of the English "jurisdiction," meaning the authority to hear and determine causes. Both trace the word to jus (law, right) and dicere or dictio (to speak, declare, determine) — literally, "to say what the law is." Burrill is the more analytically useful of the two sources here. His entry preserves the full Latin formulation — nihil aliud est jurisdictio quam habere autoritatem judicandi sive jus dicendi inter partes de actionibus personarum et rerum — which translates roughly as: jurisdiction is nothing other than having the authority to judge, or to declare the law, between parties, concerning actions relating to persons and things. This formulation reflects the civilian tradition and echoes language found in medieval glossators and early modern civil law commentators. It is a richer definition than what Bouvier offers, which pivots quickly to the English-language treatment of jurisdiction as a going concern. Bouvier's entry essentially uses jurisdictio as a gateway to his substantive discussion of jurisdiction in English-American law, directing the reader there rather than developing the Latin term on its own terms. This is editorially sensible for a practicing American lawyer but means that a researcher interested in the classical or civil law meaning of the term will get more from Burrill. Neither source engages the Roman law distinction between jurisdictio and imperium, which is a gap for researchers working in comparative or civil law contexts. For that distinction, the corpus reader should turn to civil law treatises rather than these common law dictionaries.
Jurisdictional Note
As a Latin term of art, jurisdictio does not vary by jurisdiction in the modern sense — it is a fixed historical and scholarly term. Variation arises only in how deeply different legal systems drew on the civilian tradition when theorizing about judicial authority. Louisiana, with its civil law heritage, and federal courts drawing on admiralty jurisdiction (itself heavily influenced by civilian learning) are the American contexts where classical jurisdictio concepts have had the most sustained influence on doctrine.
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
See Law Mind Encyclopedia: Jurisdiction — Historical Foundations; Roman Law and the Common Law Tradition.
Related Terms
JURISDICTION — the anglicized descendant term; the operative concept in all modern research NOTIO — narrower Roman law investigative authority; distinguished from full adjudicative power IMPERIUM — Roman law executive and coercive power; distinguished from strictly judicial jurisdictio COMPETENCE — civilian law analog for the scope of a court's adjudicative authority VENUE — modern procedural term sometimes confused with jurisdiction; geographically delimited authority COGNIZANCE — common law term for a court's taking up and recognizing a cause; functional equivalent in older English sources
JURISDICTIOmain
Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928
See NOTIO. causes. JURISDICTION (Lat. jus, law, dicere, to say). The authority by which judicial officers take cognizance of and decide 60 Vt. 618. The power to hear and determine a cause. 3 Ohio 494; 6 Pet. 709; 2 How. 338. The right of a judge to pronounce a sentence of the law, on a case or issue before him, acquired through due pro- cess of law. It includes power to enforce the execution of what is decreed. 9 Johns. 239; 8 Metc. Mass. 460; Thach. 202. The right to adjudicate concerning the subject-matter in the given case. To con- stitute this there are three essentials: First, the court must have cognizance of the class of cases to which the one to be adjudicated belongs; second, the proper parties must be present; and third, the point decided upon must be, in substance and effect, within the issue; 1 Black, Judg. § 242; 55 Ark. 200. Ancillary jurisdiction. Where one court of chancery entertains a bill in aid of a suit commenced in another chancery jurisdic- tion, both being designed to operate upon the same subject-matter or property right, but where the first suit is inadequate to give complete relief for want of territorial jurisdiction over the entire subject of liti- gation, the subsequent suits are said to be ancillary to the first. A familiar illustra- tion is a bill to foreclose a mortgage on a railroad passing through two or more states, in which ancillary bills are filed in states other than that in which the first suit is brought, without regard to the citi- zenship of the parties. Appellate jurisdiction is that given by appeal or writ of error from the judgment of another court. Assistant jurisdiction is that afforded by a court of chancery in aid of a court of law: as, for example, by a bill of discovery, or for the perpetuation of testimony, and the like. Auxiliary jurisdiction is another name given to this jurisdiction in aid of a court of law. Jurisdiction of the cause is the power over the subject-matter given by the laws of the sovereignty in which the tribunal exists. + Civil jurisdiction is that which exists when the subject-matter is not of a crimi- nal nature. Concurrent jurisdiction is that which is possessed over the same parties or subject- matter at the same time by two or more separate tribunals. Consultative jurisdiction. Where one court aids another by giving an opinion on a matter which the latter has under consid- eration the court which gives the opinion is said to exercise a consultative jurisdic- tion. 4 App. Cas. 30. Criminal jurisdiction is that which exists for the punishment of crimes. Exclusive jurisdiction is that which gives to one tribunal sole power to try the cause. General jurisdiction is that which ex- tends to a great variety of matters. Gener- al jurisdiction in law and equity is juris- diction of every kind that a court can pos- sess, of the person, subject-matter, terri- torial, and generally the power of the court in the discharge of its judicial duties. 63 Hun 367. Limited jurisdiction (called, also, special and inferior) is that which extends only to certain specified causes. Original jurisdiction is that bestowed upon a tribunal in the first instance. Jurisdiction of the person is that obtained by the appearance of the defendant before the tribunal. 9 Mass. 462. Territorial jurisdiction is the power of the tribunal considered with reference to the territory within which it is to be exer cised. 9 Mass. 462. Cooley speaks of "courts of general jurisdiction, by which is meant that their authority extends to a great variety of matters, while others are only of special and limited jurisdiction," that is, have authority extending only to certain spe- cified cases; Const. Lim., 5th ed. 502. The inferior federal courts, though of limited jurisdiction, are not technically inferior courts; 10 Wheat. 192. There are courts which are competent to decide on their own jurisdiction and to exercise it to a final judgment without setting forth in their proceedings the facts and evidence on which it is rendered, whose record is absolute verity, which can be questioned only in an appellate court; other courts are so constituted that their judgments "can be looked through for the facts and evi- dence which are necessary to sustain them," whose decisions are not evidence of themselves to show jurisdiction and its lawful exercise; 2 How. 341. Jurisdiction is given by the law; 22 Barb. 323; 3 Tex. 157; and cannot be conferred by consent of the parties; 5 Mich. 331; 28 Conn. 112; 2 Ohio St. 223; 23 Ala. N. S. 155; 34 Me. 223; 4 Cush. 27; 4 Gilm. 181; 6 Ired. 139; 4 Yerg. 579; 3 M'Cord 280; 13 Miss. 549; 32 N. E. Rep. (Ind.) 1025; 82 Wis. 644; 65 Hun 489; 52 Fed. Rep. 770; nor can silence or positive consent of parties confer on a fed- eral court jurisdiction denied by statute; 53 Fed. Rep. 18. Where the jurisdiction of a court as to the subject-matter is limited, the consent of parties cannot confer it; 91
JURISDICTIOmain
Burrill's Law Dictionary • 1870
Lat. [from jus, law, right, (juris, of law,) and dictio, a speaking, declaring, or determining.] In old English law. Jurisdiction; authority to judge, or administer justice. Nihil aliud est jurisdictio quam habere autoritatem judicandi sive jus dicendi inter partes de actionibus personarum et rerum, secundum quod deductæ fuerint in judicium per auctoritatem ordinariam vel delegatam; jurisdiction is nothing else than the having authority of judging or of administering justice [declaring the law] between the parties to personal and real actions, according as they may have been brought into court by ordinary or delegated authority. Bract. fol. 400 b. See Fleta, lib. 6, c. 37, § 1. Jurisdictio est potestas de publico introducta, cum necessitate juris dicendi; jurisdiction is a power introduced of common right, [by public authority or for the common benefit,] arising out of the necessity of declaring the law. 10 Co. 73 a, The case of the Marshalsea. 1 Bulstr. 211. This definition is borrowed from the civil

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In