JUDICIAL - The Law Mind Legal Dictionary

See encyclopedia: Mortgages -- Predatory Lending and TILA/RESPA Regulation →

JUDICIALAuthored

The Law Mind • 1499 words

Definition

Judicial is an adjective describing things that belong to, proceed from, or have the character of the judicial function — the administration of justice through courts and judges. The term operates across four overlapping senses:

1. Belonging to the office of a judge: describes the authority, power, or role of a judge acting in a judicial capacity (judicial authority, judicial officer).

2. Relating to the administration of justice: describes institutions, processes, and actors connected to the court system more broadly (judicial branch, judicial system, judicial officer).

3. Having the character of a formal legal judgment or proceeding: describes acts, determinations, or procedures that carry the force or form of a court judgment (judicial act, judicial determination, judicial sale).

4. Proceeding from a court of justice: describes writs, orders, and outcomes that issue from a court as their source (judicial writ, judicial foreclosure).

A fifth sense — relating to sound judgment or discernment — appears in general usage and occasionally in older legal writing but is not a term of art.

Common Language

Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Of or relating to the administration of justice, the court system, or the judicial branch of government; also, relating to sound judgment.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Pertaining or appropriate to courts of justice or to a judge; practiced or conformed to in the administration of justice; sanctioned or ordered by a court; also, fitted or apt for judging or deciding.
The gap between common and legal usage is modest but consequential in one respect. Both historical and modern common usage include a sense of personal discernment or good judgment ("a judicial mind," "judicious"). In strict legal usage, judicial is a relational adjective tied to courts and the judicial function — it says nothing about quality of reasoning. A researcher who encounters "judicial" in a legal document should not read any evaluative praise into the word; it is purely descriptive of institutional identity or source.

Common Confusion

JUDICIAL VS. QUASI-JUDICIAL VS. LEGISLATIVE
Judicial acts are those performed by a court or judge in the exercise of the judicial power — applying law to facts, resolving disputes, rendering judgment. Quasi-judicial acts are performed by administrative agencies or executive officers when they exercise adjudicatory functions resembling those of a court (hearings, findings, orders), but without being courts. Legislative acts create law going forward; judicial acts apply existing law to past facts. The distinction matters for separation of powers analysis, immunity doctrine, and the standard of review applicable to agency action. Historical sources use "judicial" loosely in ways that can blur this line.

Core Elements

Whether an act or function is properly "judicial" typically turns on the following:

Source: Proceeds from a court or officer exercising judicial authority, not merely administrative or executive authority.
Character: Involves application of law to specific facts with binding effect on identified parties.
Procedure: Follows or is conformed to the forms of legal process — notice, hearing, determination, judgment.
Finality: Produces a determination that concludes rights or obligations, at least provisionally.

These elements are relevant when the judicial character of an act determines legal consequences — for example, whether judicial immunity attaches, whether full faith and credit applies to a determination, or whether a government action constitutes a judicial taking rather than a legislative or administrative one.

Recognized Forms

/SUBTYPES
Judicial act: Any act performed in the exercise of judicial power; distinguished from ministerial acts performed by court officials without discretion.
Judicial determination: A finding or ruling by a court that resolves a question of law or fact.
Judicial foreclosure: A foreclosure proceeding conducted through the court system, requiring a lawsuit and court order, as opposed to non-judicial foreclosure by power of sale. See Judicial Foreclosure (Property Law Encyclopedia).
Judicial notice: A court's recognition of a fact as true without requiring formal proof.
Judicial officer: Any person authorized to act in a judicial capacity — judges, magistrates, referees, and in some contexts court commissioners.
Judicial power: The constitutional authority vested in courts to hear cases and controversies and render binding judgments; one of the three separated powers of government.
Judicial sale: A sale of property ordered or conducted under court authority, such as a sheriff's sale following judgment.
Judicial taking: A taking of private property effected by a court's ruling rather than by legislative or executive action. See Judicial Takings (Property Law Encyclopedia).
Judicial writ: A writ issuing from a court, as opposed to original writs issuing from the Chancery. Historically important in distinguishing the English common law writ system.

Why It Matters in Research

Judicial functions as a threshold adjective across enormous swaths of the Law Mind corpus. Understanding its precise sense in any given context is a prerequisite to reading historical sources accurately.

First, the judicial/ministerial distinction pervades nineteenth-century and early twentieth-century American law. Courts held that judges acting judicially were absolutely immune from civil suit; acting ministerially, they were not. Historical sources will use "judicial act" in this technical sense, and researchers should not assume the word is decorative.

Second, the judicial/quasi-judicial line becomes increasingly important as administrative law develops. Pre-New Deal sources often use "judicial" to describe agency hearings that later doctrine would categorize as quasi-judicial. Researchers tracing the evolution of due process requirements, agency review standards, or official immunity should read "judicial" with close attention to whether the source predates or postdates the consolidation of administrative law doctrine.

Third, for property research, the distinction between judicial and non-judicial foreclosure has massive jurisdictional variation and temporal variation within states. Older sources may assume judicial foreclosure as the default in ways that no longer hold in all jurisdictions. The Law Mind Property Law Encyclopedia entry on Judicial Foreclosure should be consulted in parallel.

Fourth, "judicial review" in early American sources sometimes means review of a lower court's decision by a higher court — the ordinary appellate sense — and sometimes means constitutional review of legislative acts under Marbury v. Madison. Context is essential; the two senses should not be conflated.

Fifth, tax researchers encountering "judicial review" in interest abatement contexts should consult the Tax Encyclopedia entry, where the term carries a specific procedural meaning tied to IRS discretion and the scope of Tax Court jurisdiction — a meaning that is narrower than either the appellate or constitutional senses.

Historical Dictionary Support

The six shelf sources show substantial consistency on the core definition. Bouvier and Burrill both lead with the same formulation — "belonging to the office of a judge" — and Black's First and Second Editions extend this to four distinct senses (office of a judge, administration of justice, character of judgment, and proceeding from a court). The alignment across sources reflects that "judicial" had settled meaning well before any of these dictionaries were compiled.

Burrill's citation to the Latin root judicialis and its derivation from judex (judge) and judicium (judgment) is useful for researchers navigating Latin maxims in historical sources; the same root appears in numerous Latin phrases used in English common law pleadings and judicial opinions.

Rapalje & Lawrence is less useful here for the core term — the available excerpt addresses judgment rolls and English practice rather than the adjective "judicial" directly — but it reinforces the procedural and documentary character of judicial proceedings, particularly the significance of the record as the authentic collection of papers constituting the court's action.

Anderson's entry, as excerpted, addresses judgment rather than the adjective itself, but it signals the significance of the judicial character of a judgment for full faith and credit purposes: want of jurisdiction is a defense against enforcement precisely because jurisdiction is a prerequisite to judicial authority. The implicit premise is that "judicial" means something — it is not a mere label, but a threshold condition whose absence defeats the act.

No shelf source addresses the quasi-judicial distinction or the separation of powers dimensions of "judicial" in any depth. This is a significant gap for researchers working with twentieth-century materials on administrative law or constitutional structure; the dictionary sources must be supplemented with treatise and case material.

Jurisdictional Note

The judicial/non-judicial distinction is most practically significant in foreclosure law, where states divide sharply between judicial foreclosure requirements and non-judicial power-of-sale procedures. Historically, several states permitted only judicial foreclosure; many now permit both. The procedural requirements, timelines, and redemption rights differ substantially. The Law Mind Property Law Encyclopedia entry on Judicial Foreclosure maps this variation.

Encyclopedia Cross-Reference

Judicial Foreclosure (The Law Mind Property Law Encyclopedia)
Judicial Takings (The Law Mind Property Law Encyclopedia)
Interest Abatement Judicial Review (The Law Mind Tax Encyclopedia)

JUDICIALmain

Black's Law Dictionary • 1891

Belonging to the office of a judge; as judicial authority. Relating to or connected with the adminis- tration of justice; as a judicial officer. Having the character of judgment or formal legal procedure; as a judicial act. Proceeding from a court of justice; as a judicial writ, a judicial determination.

JUDICIALmain

Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) • 1910

Belonging to the office of a judge; as judicial authority. Relating to or connected with the administration of justice; as a judicial ofticer. Having the character of judgment or formal legal procedure; as a judicial act. Proceeding from a court of justice; as a judicial writ, a judicial determination. —Judicial action. Action of a court upon a cause, by hearing it, and determining what shall be adjudged or decreed between the parties, and with which is the right of the case. Rhode Island v. Massachusetts, 12 Pet. 718, 9 L. Ed. 1233; Kerosene Lamp Heater Co. v. Monitor Oil Stove Co., 41 Ohio St. 293.—Judicial acts. Acts requiring the exercise of some judicial discretion, as distinguished from ministerial acts, which require none. Ex rte Kellogg, 6 Vt 510; Mills v. Brooklyn N. Y¥. 497; Reclamation Dist. v. Hamilton, 112 Cal. 603, 44 Pac. 1074; Pe v. Tynen, 22 Barb. (N. Y.) 140.—Judicial admissions. Admissions made voluntarily by a party which appear of record in the proceedings of the court.—Judicial authority. ‘The power and authority appertaining to the office of a judge; jurisdiction; the official right to hear and determine questions in controversy.—Judicial business. Such as involves the exercise of judicial powers or the application of the mind and authority of a court to some contested matter, or the conduct of judicial proceedings, as distinguished from such ministerial and other acts, incident to the progress of a cause, a8 may be performed by the par ties. counsel, or officers of the court without application to the court or judge. See Heisen Vv. Smith, 1388 Cal. 216, 71 Pac. 180, 94 Am. St. Rep. 39; Merchants’ Nat. Bank v. Jatray, 36 Neb. 218, 54 N. W. 258, 19 L. R. A. 316; State v. California Min. Co., 13 Nev. 214.—Judicial committee of the privy council. In English law. A tribunal composed of members of the privy council, being judges or retired judges. which acts as the king’s adviser in matters of law referred to it, and exercises a certain appellate jurisdiction, chiefly in ecclesiastical causes, though its power in this t was curtailed by the judicature act of 1873.—Jue dicial confession. In the law of evidence. A confession of guilt, made by a prisoner before a magistrate, or in court, in the due course of legal proceedings. 1 Greenl Ev. § 216; White v. State, 49 Ala. 348; U.S. v. Williams, 28 Fed. Cas. 643; State v. Lamb, 28 Mo. 218; Speer v. State, 4 Tex. App. 479.—Judicial conventions. Agreements entered into in consequence of an order of court; as, for example, entering into a bond on taking out a writ of sequestration. Penniman v, Barrymore, 6 Mart. N. S. (La.) 494.—Judicial decisions. The opinions or determinations of the judges in causes before them, particularly in appellate courts. Le Blanc vy. Illinois Cent. R. Co., 73 Miss. 463, 19 South. 211.—Judicial dicta. Dicta made by a court or judge in the course of a judicial decision or opinion. Com. v. Paine, 207 Pa. 45, 56 Atl. 317. See DictuM.—Judicial district. One of the circuits or ‘precincts into which a state is commonly divided for judicial purposes, a court of general original jurisdiction being usually provided in each of such districts, and the boundaries of the district marking the territorial limits of its authority; or the district may include two or more counties, having separate and independent county courts, but in that case they are presided over by the same judge. See Ex parte Gardner, 22 Nev. 280. 39 Pac. 570; Lindsley v. Coahoma County Sup’rs, 69 Miss. 815, 11 South. 336; Com. v. Hoar, 121 Mass. 377.—Judicial oath. One taken before an officer in open court, as distinguished from a s‘non-judicial” oath, which is taken before an officer ex parte or out of court. State v. Dreifus, 38 La. Ann. 877.—Judicial officer. A person in whom is vested authority to decide causes or exercise powers appropriate to a court. Settle v. Van Evrea, 49 N. Y. 284: People v. Wells, 2 Cal. 203; Reid v. Hood, 2 Nott & McC. (S. CG.) 170, 10 Am. Dec. 582. —Judicial power. The authority vested in courts and judges, as distinguished from the executive and legislative power. Gilbert v. Priest, 65 Barb. (N. Y.) 448; In re Walker, 68 App. Div. 196, 74 N. Y. Supp. 94; State v. Denny, 118 Ind. 382, 21 N. E. 252,4 L. R. A. 79; U. S. v. Kendall, 26 Fed. Cas. 753.—Judicial proceedings. A genera] term for proceedings relating to, practiced in, or proceeding from, a court of justice; or the course prescribed to be taken in various cases for the determination of a controversy or for legal redress or relief. See Hereford v. People, 197 Ill. 222, 64 N. E. 3810: Martin v. Simpkins, 20 Colo. 438, 38 Pac. 1092; Mullen v. Reed, 64 Conn. 240, 29 Atl. 478, 24 L. R. A. 664, 42 Am. St. Rep. 174; Aldrich v. Kinney, 4 Conn. 386, 10 Am. Dec. 151.—Judicial question. One proper for the determination of a court of justice. as distinguished from such questions as belong to the decision of the legislative or executive departments of government and with which the courts will not interfere, called ‘“‘political’’ or “‘legislative” questions. See Patton v. Chattanooga, 108 Tenn. 197, 65 S. W. 414.—Judicial remedies. Such as are administered by the courts of justice, or by judicial officers empowered for that purpose by the constitution and laws of the state. Code Civ. Proc. Cal. 1908. § 20: Code Civ. Proc. Mont. 1895, § 3469.—Judicial separation. A separation of man and wife by decree of court, less complete than an absolute divorce: —Judicial statistics. In English law. Statistics. greed by authority, of the civil and criminal business of the United Kingdom, and matters appertaining thereto. Annual reports are published separately for England and Wales, for Ireland, and for Scotland.—Quasi judicial. A term applied to the action, discretion, etc., of public administrative officers, who are required to investigate facts, or ascertain the existence of facts, and draw conclusions from them, as a basis for their official action, and to exercise discretion of a judicial nature. See Bair v. Struck, 29 Mont. 45, 74 Pac. 69, 63 L. R. oa 481; Mitchell v. Clay County, 69 Neb. 779, a 678; De Weese v. Smith (C. C.) 97 Fed. “Mortgage,” otherwise called a “limited divorce.” -

JUDICIALmain

Rapalje & Lawrence • 1888

(698) leading to the judgment and of the judgJudici officium suum excedenti non ment itself, the authentic collection of the paretur (Jenk. Cent. 139): A judge exceedpapers, proceedings, and judgment in their ing his office is not to be obeyed. order, signed by the clerk, and filed in the records of the court. 22. In English practice.-A parchment roll upon which all proceedings in the cause up to the issue, and the award of venire inclusive, together with the judgment which the court had awarded in the cause, were entered. This roll, in the treasury when thus made up, was deposited of the court, in order that it might be kept with safety and integrity. In practice, the making up and depositing the judgment roll was generally neglected, unless in cases where it became Judici satis pœna est, quod Deum habet ultorem (1 Leon. 295): It is punishment enough for a judge that he has God as his avenger. Judicia in curia regis non annihique per errorem aut attinctum adnullentur, sed stent in robore suo quouslentur: Judgments in the king's court are annulled by error or attaint. not annihilated, but remain in force until absolutely necessary to do so; as when, for inJudicia in deliberationibus crebro stance, it was required to give the proceedings in maturescunt; in accelerato processu the cause in evidence in some other action; for nunquam (3 Inst. 210): Judgments frein such a case the judgment-roll, or an examined quently become matured by deliberations: never copy thereof, was the only evidence of them that by hurried process or precipitation. could be admitted. (Sm. Ac. 184.) At the present day there seems to be no judgment-roll of any sort in use, just as there is now no issueroll, unless it should be in the House of Lords. Brown. JUDGMENT ROLL, (defined). 34 Cal. 391. Judicandum est legibus non exemplis (4 Co. 33): We are to judge by the laws, not by examples. -Appertaining to the office of a court or judge. See EXTRAJUDICIAL; REMEDY; WRIT. JUDICIAL, (defined). 22 N. Y. 67, 82, 84. JUDICIAL ACTS.-Acts requiring the exercise of some judicial discretion, as distinguished from ministerial acts, which require none. Thus, numerous English statutes give summary power to justices of the peace, and declare that certain acts shall only be valid if done by two magistrates. If it be only a ministerial act, it is not requisite that the two magistrates should be together at the time of doing the act; if it be judicial, they must. JUDICIAL ACTS, (what are). 11 Abb. (N. Y.) Pr. 301, 315; 2 Hill (N. Y.) 135. (what are not). 26 Mich. 176. (699) maxim, Discretio est scire per legem quid sit justum. (10 Co. 140.) -Wharton. JUDICIAL DISCRETION, (defined). 26 Wend. (N. Y.) 143, 152. 2. The judicial committee consists of the tions; for, as one saith, talis discretio dispresident of the Privy Council, the lord chancretionem confundit." Coke also quotes the cellor, and as a general rule, all the members of the Court of Appeal constituted by the Judicature Act, 1875, and some other judges, whose attendance is not often required. (Stats. 3 and 4 Will. IV. c. 41; 5 Vict. c. 5; 6 and 7 Vict. c. 38; 14 and 15 Vict. c. 83; 20 and 21 Vict. c. 77; Macph. Jud. Com. passim.) By the Judicial Committee Act, 1871, the crown was empowered to appoint, and did appoint, four salaried judges of the judicial committee; on their places becoming vacant they will not be filled up, but two additional lords of appeal in ordinary will be appointed. See HOUSE OF LORDS. § 3. The following are the principal matters in which the judicial committee have jurisdic-

JUDICIALa.

Websters Unabridged Dictionary (1913) • 1913

Pertaining or appropriate to courts of justice, or to a judge; practiced or conformed to in the administration of justice; sanctioned or ordered by a court; as, judicial power; judicial proceedings; a judicial sale. "Judicial massacres." Macaulay. Not a moral but a judicial law, and so was abrogated. Milton. Fitted or apt for judging or deciding; as, a judicial mind. Belonging to the judiciary, as distinguished from legislative, administrative, or executive. See Executive. Judicious. [Obs.] B. Jonson.

judicialadj

Wiktionary (English) • 2026

Wiktionary contributors • CC BY-SA 4.0 • via Kaikki
Extracted and formatted for display by Law Mind. Source link opens the current Wiktionary page and its contributor history; it is not a frozen copy of this extract.

Of or relating to the administration of justice. | Of or relating to the court system or the judicial branch of government. | specified by a civil bill court under the terms of the Land Law (Ireland) Act, 1881 | Of or relating to judgeship or the judiciary, the collective body of judges. | Of or relating to sound judgment; judicious (but see Usage notes).

judicialnoun

Wiktionary (English) • 2026

That branch of government which is responsible for maintaining the courts of law and for the administration of justice.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

Subscribe Encyclopedia Sign In