Definition
An issuable plea is a plea directed to the merits of an action — one upon which the opposing party may join issue and proceed to trial. The term belongs to the vocabulary of common law pleading: a plea is "issuable" when it raises a factual question capable of being tried, as opposed to a plea that attacks the form, timing, or procedural posture of the action without engaging its substance.
In stricter technical usage, the phrase "issuable plea" means specifically a plea in chief to the merits, distinguishing it from (1) pleas in abatement, which challenge defects in the proceeding rather than the cause of action itself, and (2) demurrable pleas, which present questions of law rather than triable questions of fact. A plea that is demurrable is not issuable; a plea in abatement, even if technically well-formed and capable of generating a subsidiary issue, does not qualify as an issuable plea in the strict sense of the term.
---
Common Confusion
ISSUABLE PLEA vs. PLEA IN ABATEMENT vs. DEMURRABLE PLEA. These three categories are frequently run together in historical sources. The distinctions matter:
- A **plea in abatement** attacks the suit on procedural or technical grounds (wrong court, defective process, nonjoinder of parties) without denying the plaintiff's underlying claim. Even a properly framed plea in abatement may generate an issue for determination, but it is not an issuable plea in the technical sense because it does not go to the merits.
- A **demurrable plea** raises a legal objection — it says, in effect, that even if the facts alleged are true, they do not support the claimed relief. Because a demurrer, not a trial, is the proper response, a demurrable plea is not issuable.
- An **issuable plea** (sometimes called a **traversable plea**) goes to the substance of the claim and invites the opposing party to deny or admit the facts pleaded, producing an issue for the jury.
Historical sources are inconsistent about whether a plea in abatement can ever be called "issuable" in the looser sense. Black's acknowledges the ambiguity directly: in ordinary language, any plea that might generate an issue could loosely be called issuable, but the technical meaning is confined to pleas in chief to the merits.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This term is a creature of classical common law pleading and is most useful as a navigational concept when working in sources from the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, when the forms of pleading — declaration, plea, replication, rejoinder — were still strictly governed.
**Research traps:**
1. **Anachronism.** The term has no operative role in modern civil procedure under code pleading or the Federal Rules. Researchers encountering "issuable plea" in post-1848 American sources (after Field Code reforms began spreading) should read carefully — the term may be used loosely, historically, or by a jurisdiction that retained common law pleading longer than most.
2. **Issue as a term of art.** In this context, "issue" means a single, specific disputed point — factual or legal — formally joined by the parties through their pleadings. The issuable plea is the defendant's contribution to that joining. Confusing this procedural "issue" with the broader modern sense of "legal issue" (any disputed question) distorts the historical analysis.
3. **Jurisdictional lag.** Some American states retained common law pleading well into the late nineteenth century. Case law from those jurisdictions (Virginia, some southern states, early New Jersey and New York) will use this vocabulary in ways that post-code researchers may find unfamiliar.
4. **Connection to the general issue.** A plea of the general issue — "not guilty" in criminal matters, "non assumpsit" or "non est factum" in contract actions — is the paradigm issuable plea. When sources discuss whether a plea is issuable, they are often asking whether it is equivalent in effect to pleading the general issue, or whether it is something narrower or more technical.
5. **Corpus connections.** When tracing plea practice in Law Mind sources, this term connects naturally to the mechanics of arraignment and the entry of pleas, and less directly to modern plea bargaining, which involves a fundamentally different procedural structure.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The three source dictionaries agree on the core definition but differ in emphasis and precision.
**Burrill** gives the most technically complete entry: an issuable plea is a plea in chief to the merits upon which the plaintiff may take issue and go to trial. Burrill is explicit that a demurrable plea is not issuable, and that a plea in abatement does not qualify — citing early English and American authorities for both propositions. This is the most reliable of the three for technical pleading research.
**Black's** acknowledges the core definition but flags the ambiguity in ordinary usage, noting that in loose parlance a plea in abatement might be called issuable if it generates an issue. Black's correctly identifies this as a terminological problem rather than a substantive one, and resolves it in favor of the strict meaning — issuable plea means a plea to the merits. The entry in Black's appears to have been truncated in the available source material, cutting off mid-sentence.
**Rapalje & Lawrence** offers the least independent analysis, directing the reader to a companion entry under "ISSUABLE" and providing case citations without extended definition. The citations to New Jersey and New York reporters are consistent with common law pleading jurisdictions in the early-to-mid nineteenth century. The surrounding text in the Rapalje entry appears to have been corrupted or misaligned in the source material — the references to "inroad of a hostile army" and "robbery by force" appear to belong to a different entry (likely a bailment or excuse doctrine entry) rather than to issuable plea.
None of the three historical dictionaries address the transition to code pleading or explain how the concept was absorbed or discarded in modern practice — a gap researchers should account for.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
The Law Mind Criminal Law Encyclopedia, "Arraignment and Entry of Plea" (criminal_198) — for context on how plea categories function at the threshold of a proceeding.
---