Definition
Inter conjuges (Latin: "between spouses") is a phrase used to classify legal acts, transactions, gifts, or proceedings as occurring between husband and wife. It appears most often in the law of property and gifts to indicate that a transfer or conveyance was made between married parties rather than between strangers. Courts and treatise writers invoked the phrase both descriptively — to identify the parties — and analytically, because transactions between spouses were governed by rules distinct from ordinary transfers between unrelated persons.
At common law, the phrase carried significant doctrinal weight: the legal unity of husband and wife (the doctrine of coverture) made many inter conjuges transactions legally impossible, void, or voidable as a matter of course. A husband could not, at common law, make a binding gift or enforceable contract to his wife because they were regarded as a single legal person. The phrase therefore flagged a category of transaction that demanded special scrutiny.
---
Common Confusion
Inter conjuges is sometimes loosely grouped with inter vivos (between the living) as though both phrases simply describe a type of gift or transfer. The distinction matters: inter vivos identifies a transfer made during the grantor's lifetime as opposed to by will or causa mortis, while inter conjuges identifies the relationship between the parties. A gift can be both inter vivos and inter conjuges, but the two phrases address different legal questions. Conflating them in historical research can cause a researcher to misread why a court is applying special rules — the concern may be coverture and spousal disability, not the timing of the transfer.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The phrase is primarily a historical marker. Researchers encountering inter conjuges in older cases, treatises, or deeds should treat it as a signal that the doctrine of coverture or its statutory modifications is almost certainly at issue. The phrase does not appear with any regularity in modern American or English legal writing because the legal framework that made it analytically necessary — the common law disability of married women to hold property, contract, and receive gifts from their husbands — has been abolished by Married Women's Property Acts and their successors.
Several research traps follow from this history:
First, the absence of modern case law using the phrase does not mean the underlying legal issues are gone. Questions about transfers between spouses — fraudulent conveyance, gift tax, marital property characterization in community property states — are alive and well; they simply no longer use this Latin label.
Second, older English and American equity sources used inter conjuges to explain why a court of equity would intervene where the common law would not. Equity sometimes enforced gifts and settlements inter conjuges that the common law refused to recognize. A researcher finding the phrase in equity materials should look for the equitable exception being carved out, not just the common law rule being stated.
Third, in civil law jurisdictions and in scholarship drawing on Roman or canon law sources, inter conjuges appears in discussions of the prohibition on donations between spouses — donatio inter conjuges — which Roman law treated with particular suspicion to prevent undue influence and preserve family property. This Roman law context surfaces in Louisiana materials and in comparative law scholarship and should not be read back into common law decisions without care.
The phrase may also appear in probate and estate litigation when the validity of an ante-nuptial or post-nuptial settlement is at issue, and in early trust law when a husband purported to settle property in trust for his wife's separate use.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Both editions of Black's Law Dictionary define inter conjuges simply as "between husband and wife," which is accurate as far as it goes but provides no analytical content. Neither edition explains why the phrase was legally significant or flags the coverture framework that gave it operational meaning. Researchers relying on Black's alone will understand the translation but not the doctrine.
The phrase's deeper legal significance is better located in treatise literature on domestic relations and personal property rather than in the general law dictionaries. The dictionary entries are consistent with each other and with the plain Latin meaning; their limitation is omission rather than error.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The phrase and the doctrine it historically signaled apply most fully in common law jurisdictions. In Louisiana and other civil law-influenced systems, the Roman law prohibition on donations inter conjuges has a distinct lineage and was codified separately. Researchers working in Louisiana materials or in conflicts-of-law contexts involving civil law jurisdictions should treat inter conjuges as pointing to a different body of authority than the English common law coverture framework.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
The Law Mind Property Law Encyclopedia: Personal Property — Gifts (Inter Vivos, Causa Mortis — Delivery, Intent, Acceptance) [property_133]
The Law Mind Trusts, Estates & Probate Encyclopedia: Revocable Inter Vivos Trusts as Will Substitutes [estates_60]
---