INQUEST

6 definitions found across Law Mind sources

INQUESTAuthored
The Law Mind • 1078 words
Definition
An inquest is a formal legal inquiry conducted by a designated official—typically a coroner or magistrate—often assisted by a jury, to investigate a specific matter of public or legal concern. The word carries three related but distinct meanings in legal usage: 1. THE PROCEEDING. The formal inquiry itself: an official investigation convened under legal authority to examine facts, most commonly the circumstances of a death. A coroner's inquest is the paradigm case—a proceeding convened when a person has died violently, suddenly, under suspicious circumstances, or in custody, to determine cause and manner of death. 2. THE BODY. The jury or group of persons assembled to conduct the inquiry. In this sense, the grand jury is historically termed the "grand inquest," reflecting its original function as an investigative body rather than merely an accusatory one. 3. THE FINDING. The verdict or conclusion returned by the inquest jury—the formal result of the proceeding. This is sometimes called the "inquisition" in older sources. A fourth usage, narrower and procedural, appears in some jurisdictions: a prosecutorial inquest to determine whether a warrantless arrestee should be formally charged. ---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): A formal investigation, often held before a jury, especially into the cause of a death; also, inquiry or quest generally. Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Judicial inquiry or official examination, especially before a jury; a coroner's inquest in case of sudden death; also, loosely, any inquiry or search. The gap between common and legal meaning here is narrow but worth noting: in ordinary usage, "inquest" has collapsed almost entirely into the coroner's context, losing the broader legal sense of any jury-based official inquiry—including inquests of office and grand inquests—that remained active in legal usage through the nineteenth century. ---
Recognized Forms
/SUBTYPES CORONER'S INQUEST. The most familiar form. An inquiry by a coroner, assisted by a jury, into the cause and manner of death of a person killed, found dead under unusual circumstances, or dying in custody. The coroner's inquest historically had both investigative and quasi-accusatory functions; in many jurisdictions the jury could name a responsible party. GRAND INQUEST. The grand jury in its historical investigative capacity. The term signals the grand jury's origins as a body that inquired into public wrongs on behalf of the Crown, not merely screened indictments. INQUEST OF OFFICE. A historical proceeding by which the Crown (or other lord) established its title or rights to property through an official jury finding. Common during the period of military tenures; the phrase "office found" derives from this usage. Burrill specifically notes these were more frequently in practice before the abolition of military tenures. SHERIFF'S INQUEST (WRIT OF INQUIRY). A proceeding, historically directed by the court to the sheriff, to assess damages in cases where liability was established but the amount remained to be determined by a jury empaneled for that purpose. ---
Why It Matters in Research
Historical sources treat "inquest" at a higher level of generality than modern readers expect. When you encounter "inquest" in pre-twentieth-century materials, do not assume the term refers exclusively to a coroner's proceeding. Burrill and Bouvier both use it to describe any jury-assisted official inquiry, including inquests of office—a category that disappeared from active practice but appears frequently in property law, land grant, and escheat records through the nineteenth century. The coroner's inquest presents its own research complexity. Its function shifted significantly across time and jurisdiction. In its older common-law form, a coroner's inquest jury could return a finding that amounted to a criminal charge—naming a killer and triggering prosecution. In modern statutory regimes, the inquest is purely investigative and its findings are not themselves criminal accusations. Researchers using nineteenth-century sources must be careful not to read modern limitations back into historical records, and vice versa. The connection between "inquest" and "grand jury" matters for anyone researching grand jury history. Sources from the seventeenth through nineteenth centuries regularly use "grand inquest" and "grand jury" interchangeably; understanding that the grand jury was conceived as an investigative body—an inquest—rather than primarily as a screening mechanism for indictments reframes a significant body of constitutional and procedural history. Corpus researchers should also be alert to the term "inquisition" as a near-synonym for the finding or verdict of an inquest. Bouvier explicitly equates them. This matters when searching historical records: a document titled "inquisition" may record what modern parlance calls an inquest verdict. ---
Historical Dictionary Support
The major historical dictionaries are substantially in agreement on the three core meanings—the body, the proceeding, and the finding—though they weight them differently. Black's (both editions) leads with the body and grand jury connection before moving to the proceeding. Bouvier leads with the body as well, emphasizing the grand inquest usage. Anderson's is the most concise, treating the term primarily as a jury inquiry into any civil or criminal cause. Burrill provides the most useful jurisdictional texture, specifically noting that inquests of office—the property-related Crown inquiries—were creatures of the period of military tenure and had declined by his time. This contextualizes why modern dictionaries largely drop that subtype. What the historical dictionaries collectively underemphasize is the procedural mechanics of the coroner's inquest as a quasi-criminal proceeding capable of generating a charge. They define the institution but do not fully capture the accusatory weight it once carried. Researchers should supplement dictionary sources with treatise material on coroner's practice for that dimension. The Rapalje & Lawrence excerpt in the source material does not contain a usable entry for inquest—the fragments provided address unrelated terms (innuendo, verdict, verge). This gap in coverage from that dictionary is worth noting; for inquest doctrine Rapalje is not a primary reference. ---
Jurisdictional Note
The coroner's inquest survives in considerably different forms across U.S. states and common-law jurisdictions. Some states have abolished the coroner's office in favor of medical examiners with no jury function; others retain a formal inquest proceeding with jury participation. England and Wales retain the coroner's inquest as an active institution with its own modern statutory framework (Coroners and Justice Act 2009). Researchers should not assume that any general description of inquest procedure applies uniformly across jurisdictions or time periods. ---
Related Terms
Coroner — Inquisition — Grand Jury — Jury — Inquest of Office — Verdict — Inquiry — Writ of Inquiry — Escheat — Office Found — Medical Examiner — Cause of Death
INQUESTmain
Black's Law Dictionary • 1891
1. A body of men appointed by law to inquire into certain matters. grand jury is sometimes called the "grand inquest." 2. The judicial inquiry made by a jury summoned for the purpose is called an "in- quest." The finding of such men, upon an investigation, is also called an "inquest." 3. The inquiry by a coroner, termed a "coroner's inquest," into the manner of the death of any one who has been slain, or has died suddenly or in prison. 4. This name is also given to a species of proceeding under the New York practice, al- lowable where the defendant in a civil action has not filed an affidavit of merits nor verified his answer. In such case the issue may be taken up, out of its regular order, on plain- tiff's motion, and tried without the admission of any affirmative defense. An inquest is a trial of an issue of fact where ; the plaintiff alone introduces testimony. The de- fendant is entitled to appear at the taking of the inquest, and to cross-examine the plaintiff's wit- nesses; and, if he do appear, the inquest must be taken before a jury, unless a jury be expressly waived by him. 6 How. Pr. 118.
INQUESTmain
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) • 1910
1. A body of men appointed by law to inquire into certain matters. ‘The grand jury is sometimes calied the “grand: inquest.” 2. The judicial inquiry made by a jury summoned for the purpose is called an “inquest.” The finding of such men, upon an investigation, is also called an “inquest.” People v. Coombs, 36 App. Div. 284, 55 N. Y. Supp. 276; Davis v. Bibb County, 116 Ga. 23, 42 Ss. E. 403. 3. The inquiry by a coroner, termed a. “coroner’s inquest,” into the manner of the death of any one who has been slain, or has. died suddenly or in prison. 4. This name Is also given to a species of proceeding under the New York practice, allowable where the defendant in a civil action has not filed an attidavit of merits nor verified his answer. In such case the issue may be taken up, out of its regular order, on plaintiff’s motion, and tried without the admission of any affirmative defense. An inquest is a trial of an issue of fact where the plaintiff alone introduces testimony. The defendant is entitled to appear at the taking of the inquest, and to cross-examine the plaintiff’s witnesses: and, if he do appear, the inquest must be taken before a jury, unless aoe be: expressly waived by him. Haines v. Davis, 6 How. Prac. (N. Y.) 118. —Coroner’s inquest. See CORONER.—Inquest of lunacy. See PUNSCT maquest of office. In English practice. An inqu made made by the king's (or queen’s) officer, his sheriff, coroner, or escheator, virtute officti, or by writ sent to them for that purpose, or by commissioners specially appointed, eoncerning any
INQUESTmain
Rapalje & Lawrence • 1888
(661) INNUENDO, (defined). 1 Blatchf. (U. S.) 588; 8 Ala. 466; Minor (Ala.) 93; 4 Conn. 17, 34; 4 Ν. Η. 110, 113; 3 Gr. (N. J.) 249; 2 Harr. (N. J.) 15; 1 Den. (N. Y.) 347; 16 Wend. (N. Y.) 17; Wright (Ohio) 121; 8 Wheel. Am. C. L. 124. (what is). 12 Conn. 290. (office of). 2 Harr. & J. (Md.) 363; plaintiff, and a trial had, in which no affirm ative defence is admitted. This proceeding is authorized where the defendant has failed to file an affidavit that he has a good defence upon the merits, and has also failed to verify his answer. (N.Y. Code Civ. Pro. 2 Hill (N. Y.) 507; 15 Wend. (N. Y.) 232; 118980.) The defendant may appear, and Serg. & R. (Pa.) 343; 1 Ld. Raym. 256; 1 Saund. 243 п. (effect of). 16 Wend. (N. Y.) 22. of). (distinguished from "colloquium"). Am. Dec. 349 n.; 7 Johns. (Ν. Υ.) 359. (defect not supplied by). 2 Hill (N. Y.) 318; 5 Johns. (N. Y.) 430, (words uncertain not supplied by). 4 (in a declaration). 4 Co. 17; Cro. (in an information for libel). 2 Cowp. Com. Dig. 683. Jac. 126. 679. Salk. 513. (in an information for perjury). 2 - NORMAN-FRENCH: enqueste, from enquere, to inquire into. Britt. 3b. 1. Originally meant the same as inquisition (q. v.), (Littleton (368) also uses it in the sense of "jury"), but at the present day it is usually used to signify an inquiry held by a jury before a coroner, as to the death of a person who has been slain, or has died suddenly, or in prison, or under suspicious circumstances. It is held super visum corporis, i. e. after the jury have viewed the body of the deceased, and the evidence is given on oath. If the jury, by their verdict or inquisition, find a person guilty of murder or other homicide, such an inquisition is, in England, in all respects equivalent to an indictment (q. v.), (2 Steph. Com. 637; 4 Id. 360; Archb. Cr. Pl. 121); but such is not the case in America. See CORONER, § 1. 22. The term "inquest" is also applied to a proceeding allowed in New York, by which, upon an issue of fact in an action at common law, a cause may be taken up out of its regular order, on motion of the object to the evidence offered by the plaintiff, except to rulings of the court, and crossexamine the plaintiff's witnesses; but he cannot introduce testimony on his own behalf, nor make out, even by cross-examination, an affirmative defence. The name "inquest" is also given, though perhaps incorrectly, to a trial, upon the default of the defendant in failing to appear when the cause is called in its order for trial; even where, a jury being held to be waived by the defendant's failing to appear, such trial is had before the court without a jury. But, in the strict meaning of the word, an "inquest" seems to imply the summoning and action of a jury. Abbott. 3. A grand jury is also sometimes called the "grand inquest." INQUEST, (defined). 6 How. (N. Y.) Pr. 119 INQUEST OF OFFICE, or simply "office," as it is termed in the old books, is a prerogative remedy for the benefit of the sovereign, which was formerly much in use. It is an inquiry made by a jury before a sheriff, coroner, escheator, or other government officer, or by commissioners specially appointed, concerning any matter that entitles the sovereign to the possession of lands or tenements, goods or chattels, e. g. by reason of an escheat, forfeiture, idiocy, &c. (See INQUISITIO POST MORTEM; INQUISITION.) In England, these offices are of two sorts, either of entitling, or of instruction. 22. Office of entitling. An office of entitling (which formerly issued out of Chancery,) is used where the crown does not become entitled to the property until after an office has been taken (Chit. Prerog. 246); thus, if the crown claims the land of an idiot, the person must first be found an idiot by office. (Id. 250; Staunf. 55.) Formerly in cases where the crown became entitled to the possession of land under such circumstances that a common person could not have obtained possession without making an entry on the land (as where a tenant committed a forfeiture giving the lord a right of re-entry), the crown could not obtain possession without an inquest of office. This, however, is no longer necessary. Stat. 22 and 23 Vict. c. 21, § 25.
INQUESTn.
Websters Unabridged Dictionary (1913) • 1913
Inquiry; quest; search. [R.] Spenser. The laborious and vexatious inquest that the soul must make after science. South. Judicial inquiry; official examination, esp. before a jury; as, a coroner's inquest in case of a sudden death. A body of men assembled under authority of law to inquire into any matterm civil or criminal, particularly any case of violent or sudden death; a jury, particularly a coroner's jury. The grand jury is sometimes called the grand inquest. See under Grand. The finding of the jury upon such inquiry. Coroner's inquest, an inquest held by a coroner to determine the cause of any violent, sudden, or mysterious death. See Coroner. -- Inquest of office, an inquiry made, by authority or direction of proper officer, into matters affecting the rights and interests of the crown or of the state. Craig. Bouvier.
inquestnoun
Wiktionary (English) • 2026
Wiktionary contributorsCC BY-SA 4.0 • via Kaikki
Extracted and formatted for display by Law Mind. Source link opens the current Wiktionary page and its contributor history; it is not a frozen copy of this extract.
A formal investigation, often held before a jury, especially one into the cause of a death | An inquiry, typically into an undesired outcome | The jury hearing such an inquiry, and the result of the inquiry | enquiry; quest; search | Prosecutorial proceeding on whether or not a warrantless arrestee is charged with an offense.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In