INJURIOUS WORDS - The Law Mind Legal Dictionary

INJURIOUS WORDSAuthored

The Law Mind • 880 words

Definition

Injurious words is a term of Louisiana civil law referring to spoken or written statements that damage a person's reputation, honor, or dignity — encompassing what other legal systems call slander (spoken defamation) or libel (written defamation). The term derives from the Louisiana Civil Code and reflects the state's civilian legal tradition, rooted in French and Spanish civil law, rather than the common law defamation framework that governs in other American jurisdictions.

In Louisiana usage, injurious words function as the civilian analog to the common law tort of defamation. The Civil Code historically treated injurious words as a recognized basis for civil liability, providing a cause of action for reputational harm caused by false or malicious statements.

Common Confusion

Researchers encountering "injurious words" in historical Louisiana sources should not assume equivalence with the common law categories of slander per se or libel per se, which carry their own technical requirements. Nor should the term be confused with "fighting words" — the constitutional category of face-to-face provocations unprotected by the First Amendment. Injurious words is a civil liability concept; fighting words is a First Amendment doctrine. The overlap in everyday language makes this conflation easy and consequential.

The term also should not be read as synonymous with the modern tort label "defamation," which in Louisiana has increasingly been harmonized with common law doctrine through case law, gradually displacing the older civilian terminology.

Why It Matters in Research

This term is a jurisdictional artifact. It appears almost exclusively in Louisiana legal sources — codes, treatises, and court opinions — and has no functional equivalent as a legal term of art in any other American jurisdiction. Researchers working in pre-twentieth-century Louisiana materials will encounter it frequently; researchers in common law states will not encounter it as an operative legal term at all.

Several research traps apply:

First, historical Louisiana sources use "injurious words" where modern Louisiana sources increasingly use "defamation." If you are tracing a Louisiana defamation cause of action backward through time, you must shift search vocabulary at some point in the nineteenth or early twentieth century.

Second, the Civil Code article cited in historical sources — Article 3501 in the Black's 2nd Ed. Supplemental entry — places injurious words within the prescriptive (limitations) framework of the Louisiana Civil Code, not within the substantive tort articles. This means the term may appear in procedural and limitations contexts, not only in liability discussions.

Third, because Louisiana civilian law conceptualized honor and reputation as protected interests in their own right — rather than as economic interests protected instrumentally — early Louisiana injurious words doctrine can read quite differently from common law defamation. Researchers importing common law analytical frameworks into Louisiana historical sources risk misreading the doctrine.

Fourth, constitutional overlay matters for any modern research connecting to this term. The First Amendment doctrines governing defamation (developed through federal case law) now apply in Louisiana as in every state, meaning the civilian tradition coexists with, and is constrained by, federal constitutional limits on defamation liability.

Historical Dictionary Support

The historical dictionaries converge cleanly on this term's meaning, though they do so with varying precision.

Black's Law Dictionary (1st Ed.) defines injurious words simply as a Louisiana civil law term, without elaboration. The 2nd Ed. Supplemental entry is more useful, expressly equating injurious words with "slander, or libelous words" and anchoring the definition to Civil Code article 3501 — giving researchers a concrete code reference to pursue.

Bouvier's entry is the most contextually informative. It places injurious words within a broader discussion of injury (from the Latin injuria, meaning a wrong or tort) and distinguishes absolute injuries, private injuries, and public injuries. This framing reveals that Louisiana civilian lawyers understood injurious words as a subcategory of private civil wrong — harm to the individual considered as an individual — rather than as a public offense. This civilian conceptual architecture differs meaningfully from the common law, where defamation straddles civil tort and, historically, criminal libel.

What the historical dictionaries do not address: the procedural mechanics of pursuing an injurious words claim, the relationship between injurious words and the Louisiana law of moral damages, or the eventual constitutional displacement of purely civilian defamation doctrine. Researchers should not treat these entries as complete statements of Louisiana defamation law.

Jurisdictional Note

Injurious words as a term of art is specific to Louisiana. Its appearance in legal sources outside Louisiana almost certainly signals either a quotation from Louisiana law or a historical comparison between civilian and common law systems. In Louisiana itself, the term has receded as modern courts use "defamation" as the operative label, though the civilian conceptual heritage continues to influence how Louisiana courts analyze reputational torts.

Encyclopedia Cross-Reference

Fighting Words, True Threats, and Hostile Audience — The Law Mind Constitutional Law Encyclopedia (for the First Amendment boundary conditions that constrain any modern injurious words or defamation analysis)

INJURIOUS WORDSmain

Black's Law Dictionary • 1891

In Louisiana. Civil Code La.

INJURIOUS WORDSmain

Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928

In Louis- iana. Slander, or libellous words. INJURY (Lat. in, negative, jus, a right). A wrong or tort. Absolute injuries are injuries to those rights which a person possesses as being a member of society. Private injuries are infringements of the private or civil rights belonging to individ- uals considered as individuals. Public injuries are breaches and viola- tions of rights and duties which affect the whole community as a community. Injuries to personal property are the un- lawful taking and detention thereof from the owner; and other injuries are some damage affecting the same while in the claimant's possession or that of a third person, or injuries to his reversionary in- terests. Injuries to real property are ousters, trespasses, nuisances, waste, subtraction of rent, disturbances of right of way, and the like. Relative injuries are injuries to those rights which a person possesses in relation to the person who is immediately affected by the wrongful act done. It is obvious that the divisions overlap each other, and that the same act may be, for example, a rela- tive, a private, and a public injury at once. For many injuries of this character the offender may be obliged to suffer punishment for the public wrong and to recompense the sufferer for the particular loss which he has sustained. The distinction is more commonly marked by the use of the terms civil injuries to denote private injuries, and of crimes, misdemeanors, etc., to denote the public in- Jury done: though not always; as, for example, in case of a public nuisance which may be also a pri- vate nuisance. Injuries arise in three ways: first, by non-feasance, or the not doing what was a legal obligation, or duty, or contract, to perform; second, misfeasance, or the per- formance in an improper manner of an act which it was either the party's duty or his contract to perform; third, malfeasance, or the unjust performance of some act which the party had no right or which he had contracted not to do. The remedies are different as the injury affects private individuals or the public. When the injuries affect a private right and a private individual, although often also affecting the public, there are three descriptions of remedies: first, the pre- ventive, such as defence, resistance, re- caption, abatement of nuisance, surety of the peace, in junction, etc.; second, remedies for compensation, which may be by arbi- tration, suit, action, or summary proceed- ings before a justice of the peace; third, proceedings for punishment, as by indict- ment, or summary proceedings before a justice. When the injury is such as to affect the public, it becomes a crime, mis- demeanor, or offence, and the party may be punished by indictment, or summary conviction for the public injury, and by civil action at the suit of the party for the private wrong. But in cases of felony the remedy by action for the private injury is generally suspended until the party partic- ularly injured has fulfilled his duty to the public by prosecuting the offender for the public crime; and in cases of homicide the remedy is merged in the felony; 1 Chitty, Pr. 10; Ayliffe, Pand. 592. There are many injuries for which the law affords no remedy. In general, it in- terferes only when there has been a visible physical injury inflicted, while it leaves almost totally unprotected the whole class of the most malignant mental injuries and sufferings, unless in a few cases where, by a fiction, it supposes some pecuniary loss, and sometimes affords compensation to wounded feelings. A parent, for example, cannot sue, in that character, for an injury inflicted on his child, and when his own domestic happiness has been destroyed, un- less the fact will sustain the allegation that the daughter was the servant of her father, and that by reason of such seduction he lost the benefit of her services; but the proof of loss of service has reference only to the form of the remedy. And when the action is sustained in point of form, dam- ages may be given not only for the loss of service, but also for all that the plaintiff can feel from the nature of the injury; 20 Pa. 354; 9 N. W. Rep. 599; 14 Cent. L. J. 12. Another instance may be mentioned. A party cannot recover damages for verbal slander in many cases: as, when the facts published are true; for the defendant would justify, and the party injured must fail. Nor will the law punish criminally the author of verbal slander imputing even the most infamous crimes, unless done with intent to extort a chattel, money, or valuable thing. The law presumes, per- haps unnaturally enough, that a man is incapable of being alarmed or affected by such injuries to his feelings. See 1 Bish. Cr. L. § 591; Cl. Cr. L. 347. The true and sufficient reason for these rules would seem to be the uncertain char- acter of the injury inflicted, the impos- sibility of compensation, and the danger, supposing a pecuniary compensation to be attempted, that injustice would be done unde

Injurious Wordsmain

Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) - Supplemental • 1910

In Louisiana. Slander, or libelous words. Clvil Code La. art 3501

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

Subscribe Encyclopedia Sign In