INDICTMENT - The Law Mind Legal Dictionary

See encyclopedia: Right to Counsel -- Attachment and Critical Stages →

INDICTMENTAuthored

The Law Mind • 1290 words

Definition

A formal written accusation charging a named person with a criminal offense, found and returned by a grand jury after reviewing evidence presented by the prosecution. The grand jury, legally convened and sworn, determines whether probable cause exists to believe the accused committed the offense. If it does, the jury returns the accusation as a "true bill," and the document becomes the indictment on which the accused is tried.

The indictment serves two primary functions: it authorizes the government to proceed with a criminal prosecution, and it notifies the accused of the specific charges they must answer. A valid indictment must identify the offense with sufficient particularity to allow the defendant to prepare a defense and to protect against double jeopardy for the same conduct.

Common Language

Modern common usage (Wiktionary): An official formal accusation for a criminal offence, or the process by which it is brought to a jury; also used loosely to mean any serious accusation or evidence of failure or poor performance.

Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): The act of indicting, or the state of being indicted; the formal statement of an offense framed by the prosecuting authority and found by the grand jury; an accusation in general.

Both the popular and legal senses share the same core — a formal accusation of wrongdoing. The gap is procedural and constitutional. In legal usage, an indictment is specifically the product of grand jury action, not merely prosecutorial decision. The casual usage — "the report is an indictment of the agency's practices" — strips away the grand jury requirement entirely. This distinction matters when reading historical legal sources: a document described as an "indictment" in common writing may be no more than a complaint or information.

Common Confusion

Indictment vs. Information: Both are formal charging instruments in criminal cases, but an information is filed directly by the prosecutor without grand jury involvement. In federal court, the Fifth Amendment requires indictment by grand jury for capital or infamous crimes; many states permit felony prosecution by information at the prosecutor's election or with the defendant's waiver. Historical sources, especially pre-twentieth century, sometimes use "indictment" loosely to encompass all formal charges — context and jurisdiction matter.

Indictment vs. Presentment: The historical sources flag this distinction. A presentment was a grand jury's self-initiated accusation, made without a formal bill submitted by the prosecutor. The indictment, by contrast, was based on a bill preferred to the jury by the crown or prosecution. Presentments have largely disappeared from American practice; the distinction appears mainly in older authorities and is rarely operative today.

Indictment vs. Complaint: A complaint initiates a criminal proceeding and may support arrest or initial judicial proceedings. It does not by itself authorize trial on serious charges. An indictment supersedes the complaint and is the instrument on which trial proceeds.

Core Elements

For an indictment to be legally sufficient, most American jurisdictions require:

Grand jury action: Returned by a legally constituted grand jury upon a finding of probable cause, based on evidence presented in closed proceedings.

Written form: The accusation must be reduced to writing and presented to the court in which the grand jury is impaneled.

Identification of the accused: The defendant must be named or described with sufficient specificity.

Statement of the offense: The charge must describe the conduct alleged with enough particularity to inform the accused of the nature of the accusation, identify the applicable law, and allow a double jeopardy defense in future proceedings.

Time and place: Traditionally required, though modern practice allows some flexibility so long as the defendant is not prejudiced.

Signature and endorsement: The foreperson signs as a true bill on behalf of the grand jury.

Why It Matters in Research

The constitutional anchor matters for corpus navigation. The Fifth Amendment's Grand Jury Clause requires indictment for "capital, or otherwise infamous" federal crimes — but it was not incorporated against the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. This means pre-twentieth-century state cases may show felony prosecutions proceeding entirely by information, and researchers should not assume the federal constitutional standard applies in state court materials at any period.

The word "infamous" has its own doctrinal history. Crimes carrying imprisonment in a penitentiary have generally qualified; the line has shifted over time and is worth tracing independently when the nature of the charge is at issue.

Historical corpus materials will frequently reference the "bill of indictment" — the document submitted to the grand jury before it acted. The bill becomes the indictment only upon the grand jury's endorsement as a true bill. Sources that use "bill" and "indictment" interchangeably may be describing different procedural stages; read carefully.

Grand jury proceedings are secret, and the indictment as a public document reflects only the outcome, not the evidence considered. Researchers using indictments as historical sources should treat them as allegations, not findings of guilt, and should not infer anything about the underlying evidence from the face of the document alone.

The distinction between indictment and presentment matters when working with early American and English materials. The presentment appears frequently in colonial and early republic sources as the vehicle for grand jury accusations of public nuisances and local offenses. Modern researchers unfamiliar with the term may misread these as equivalent to modern indictments when the procedural origin was different.

Historical Dictionary Support

The historical dictionaries are in close agreement on the core definition. Burrill, Bouvier, Anderson, Rapalje & Lawrence, and both editions of Black's converge on the same formulation: a written accusation of one or more persons of a crime or misdemeanor, preferred to and presented upon oath by a grand jury. The variation is stylistic rather than substantive.

Bouvier adds the phrase "at the suit of the crown" — a reminder that these definitions were drafted when English practice was still the primary reference frame, and that American adaptations of this inherited procedure carried over the language even as sovereignty shifted from crown to state.

Rapalje & Lawrence preserves the technical distinction between the bill as "preferred" to the grand jury and the indictment as the instrument returned after deliberation — a procedural nuance the other sources elide. Their Latin fragment ("Indictment de felony est contra pacem domini regis, coronam et dignitatem suam...") reflects the traditional formal language of English felony indictments charging offense against the king's peace, crown, and dignity — language that persisted in American pleading longer than is often recognized.

What the historical dictionaries largely omit: the constitutional dimension. None of the shelf sources squarely addresses the Fifth Amendment's Grand Jury Clause or the non-incorporation question that makes the indictment requirement a federal-only rule. Researchers relying solely on historical definitions will find sound procedural description but will miss the constitutional architecture that governs when indictment is required.

Jurisdictional Note

The Fifth Amendment grand jury requirement applies to federal felony prosecutions but has not been incorporated against the states. Most states permit prosecution by information as an alternative to indictment for felonies, and some have abolished the grand jury indictment requirement entirely. A handful of states retain mandatory indictment for capital or first-degree offenses. Researchers working across jurisdictions should verify local rules before drawing procedural conclusions.

Encyclopedia Cross-Reference

The Fifth Amendment — Grand Jury Indictment Clause (Law Mind Constitutional Law Encyclopedia)

INDICTMENTmain

Black's Law Dictionary • 1891

An indictment is an accusation in writing found and presented by a grand jury, legally convoked and sworn, to the court in which it is impaneled, charging that a person therein named has done some act, or been guilty of some omission, which, by law, is a public offense, punishable on in- dictment. Code Iowa 1880, § 4295; Pen. Code Cal. § 917; Code Ala. 1886, § 4364. A presentment differs from an indictment in that it is an accusation made by a grand jury of their own motion, either upon their own observation and knowledge, or upon evidence before them; while an indictment is preferred at the suit of the government, and is usually framed in the first in- stance by the prosecuting officer of the government, and by him laid before the grand jury, to be found or ignored. An information resembles in its form and substance an indictment, but is filed at the mere discretion of the proper law officer of the gov- ernment, without the intervention or approval of a grand jury. 2 Story, Const. §§ 1784, 1786. In Scotch law. An indictment is the

INDICTMENTmain

Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) • 1910

given fact as probable, but not certain. For example, “indicia of partnership” are any circumstances which would induce the belief that a given person was in reality, though not ostensibly, a member of a given firm. An indictment is an accusation in writing found and presented by a grand jury, legally convoked and sworn, to the court in which it is impaneled, charging that a person therein named has done some act, or been guilty of some omission, which, by law, is a public offense, punishable on indictment. Code Iowa 1880, § 4295; Pen. Code Cal. § 917; Code Ala. 1886, § 4364. And see Grin v. Shine, 187 U. 8. 181, 23 Sup. Ct 98, 47 L. Ed. 130; State v. Walker, 32 N. C 236; Ex parte Hart, 63 Fed. 259, 11 C. C. A. 165, 28 L. R. A. 801; Ex parte Bain, 121 U. S. 1, 7 Sup. Ct. 781, 30 L. Ed. 849; Ex parte Slater, 72 Mo. 102; Finley v. State, 61 Ala. 201. A presentment differs from an indictment in that it is an accusation made by a grand jury of their own motion, either upon their own observation and knowledge, or upon evidence before them; while an indictment is preferred at the suit of the government, and is usually framed in the first instance by the prec ne officer of the government, and by him laid before the grand jury, to be found or ignored. An information resembles in its form and substance an indictment, but is filed at the mere discre-. tion of the proper law officer of the government, without the intervention or approval of a grand jury. 2 Story, Const. §§ 1784, 1786. In Scotch law. An indictment is the form of process by which a criminal is brought to trial ut the instance of the lord advocate. Where a private party is a principal prosecu- tor,;he brings his charge in what is termed the “form of criminal letters.” —Joint indictment. When several offenders are joined in the same indictment, such an indictment is called a “joint indictment ;” as when principals in the first and second degree, and accessaries before and after the fact, are all joined in the same indictment. 2 Haile, P. C. 173 ;. Brown. Indictment de felony est contra pacem domini regis, coronam et dignitatem suam, in genere et non in individuo; quia in Anglia non est interregnum. Jenk. Cent. 205. Indictment for felony is against the peace of our lord the king, his crown and dignity in general, and not against his individual person; because in England there is noe interregnum:

INDICTMENTmain

Rapalje & Lawrence • 1888

(648) -A written accusation 19 Ohio St. 248. of one or more persons of a crime presented on oath by a grand jury. The indictment is preferred, i. e. laid, before the grand jury under the technical name of a bill. The witnesses in support of the charge are then examined, and if the Indictment de felony est contra pacem domini regis, coronam et dignitatem suam, in genere et non in individuo; quia in Anglia non est interregnum (Jenk. Cent. 205): Indictment for felony is against the peace of our lord the king, his crown and dignity in general, and not against is no interregnum. his individual person; because in England there offence appears to a majority of the jury (consisting of twelve at least) to be sufficiently proved to put the offender on his trial, they indorse on the indictment, an offence. "true bill." The indictment is then said

INDICTMENTn.

Websters Unabridged Dictionary (1913) • 1913

The act of indicting, or the state of being indicted. The formal statement of an offense, as framed by the prosecuting authority of the State, and found by the grand jury. An accusation in general; a formal accusation. Bill of indictment. See under Bill.

indictmentnoun

Wiktionary (English) • 2026

Wiktionary contributors • CC BY-SA 4.0 • via Kaikki
Extracted and formatted for display by Law Mind. Source link opens the current Wiktionary page and its contributor history; it is not a frozen copy of this extract.

An official formal accusation for a criminal offence, or the process by which it is brought to a jury. | The official legal document outlining the charges concerned; bill of indictment. | An accusation of wrongdoing; a criticism or condemnation. | Evidence of failure or poor performance.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

Subscribe Encyclopedia Sign In