INDIAN - The Law Mind Legal Dictionary

INDIANAuthored

The Law Mind • 1290 words

Definition

In American law, "Indian" refers to a person recognized as a member of an aboriginal tribe of North America, or a descendant thereof, who retains tribal relations or is otherwise recognized by federal authority as subject to the unique federal-tribal legal relationship. The term carries significant legal weight: it determines the applicability of federal Indian law, treaty rights, tribal jurisdiction, and a wide range of statutory protections and limitations that apply to no other population in the United States.

The legal definition is not purely racial or ancestral. Courts and federal agencies have generally required two elements: (1) some degree of Indian blood, and (2) recognition or affiliation as a member of a tribe that maintains a political relationship with the federal government. Blood quantum alone, without tribal connection, has generally been insufficient.

In federal statutes, the definition varies by context. Some laws define "Indian" broadly to include any person of Indian descent recognized as such by a tribe or the federal government. Others, such as the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), use more specific definitions tied to tribal membership or eligibility for membership. Researchers must always identify the statute-specific definition operative in any given legal context.

Common Language

Modern common usage (Wiktionary): An alternative letter-case form of "Indian," referring to an indigenous person.

Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Pertaining to India proper, the East Indies, or the West Indies; or pertaining to the aboriginal inhabitants of America.

The historical ambiguity embedded in "Indian" — which applied simultaneously to South Asian peoples and to the aboriginal peoples of the Americas — does not persist in American legal usage, where the term has always referred exclusively to Native American peoples when appearing in domestic statutes and treaties. However, the Webster's entry is a useful reminder that early sources may require context to confirm the referent. In legal research, the term is unambiguous when appearing in federal Indian law materials, but older colonial-era documents should be read carefully.

Common Confusion

Indian vs. Native American vs. American Indian: These terms are used interchangeably in common speech and are increasingly interchangeable in modern federal statutes and agency usage, but historical legal sources almost exclusively use "Indian" or "American Indian." Researchers using "Native American" as a search term in pre-1970s materials will miss most relevant primary sources.

Indian vs. tribal member: Not every person of Indian descent is a member of a federally recognized tribe, and not every tribal member meets every statutory definition of "Indian." The distinction matters acutely when determining ICWA applicability, tribal court jurisdiction, or eligibility for federal Indian programs.

Core Elements

Where a formal legal definition of "Indian" is operative, courts have generally required:

1. Ancestry: The individual must have some quantum of Indian blood traceable to a member of an aboriginal tribe. The degree required varies by statute and context; no single federal standard applies universally.

2. Tribal recognition or affiliation: The individual must be recognized as Indian by a tribe or by the federal government. This is the political, not purely racial, dimension of the definition. It grounds federal Indian law in the government-to-government relationship between the United States and tribal nations rather than in racial classification — a distinction of constitutional importance.

Why It Matters in Research

The term "Indian" is a jurisdictional trigger in American law. Whether a person qualifies as an "Indian" under the applicable definition determines whether federal or tribal law governs, whether state courts have jurisdiction, and whether a broad array of federal statutes apply — among them ICWA, the Indian Reorganization Act, the Major Crimes Act, and treaty rights provisions.

Several research traps deserve attention:

First, the definition is not uniform. Different statutes define "Indian" differently, and no single definition governs across all federal Indian law. A researcher who assumes the definition from one statute carries over to another will frequently reach incorrect conclusions.

Second, the historical corpus uses "Indian" in ways that reflect the political assumptions of their era. Bouvier's notes that Indians "have no political rights in the United States" as a general matter — a statement that was substantially accurate as a description of 19th-century law but is deeply misleading as a general proposition today. Anderson's notes correctly that mixed-blood individuals could qualify if they retained tribal membership — a nuance that survives in modern doctrine.

Third, the shift from racial to political framing is a critical development in 20th-century law. Early sources treat Indian status as a matter of descent; modern federal law grounds it in the government-to-government relationship with federally recognized tribes. This shift has constitutional significance: in Morton v. Mancari (1974), the Supreme Court upheld federal Indian hiring preferences precisely because Indian status in that context was a political, not racial, classification. Researchers working with pre-1970s sources must be alert to this conceptual gap.

Fourth, federally recognized tribe is a term of art. There are tribes with historical presence and Indian communities that lack federal recognition, and their members may fall outside statutory definitions even where tribal identity is unambiguous culturally or ancestrally. The federal recognition list maintained by the Bureau of Indian Affairs is the operative authority.

Fifth, ICWA creates its own definitional regime. Under ICWA, a child can qualify as an "Indian child" if eligible for tribal membership even if not yet enrolled — a forward-looking definition that differs from most other federal Indian law contexts.

Historical Dictionary Support

Anderson's Dictionary of Law provides the most useful legal definition among the shelf sources, correctly identifying that individuals of mixed ancestry could qualify as "Indians" for legal purposes if they retained their distinctive character as tribal members — a principle that anticipates the modern emphasis on tribal affiliation over blood quantum alone.

Bouvier's is historically informative but must be read as a snapshot of 19th-century federal Indian policy, not as a statement of current law. Bouvier's assertion that Indians generally lack political rights reflects the plenary power doctrine of that era and the near-universal exclusion of tribal members from state citizenship and suffrage. The exception Bouvier notes for New York — where Indians were considered citizens and not aliens — is an early example of jurisdictional variation that remains a feature of Indian law today.

Neither source captures the 20th-century reconception of Indian legal status as rooted in political sovereignty rather than race, and neither addresses the statutory complexity that now surrounds the term. Both treat the category as relatively fixed; modern law treats it as statute-specific.

Jurisdictional Note

Federal law governs the core definition of "Indian" for purposes of federal statutes and treaty rights. State law generally has no authority to define "Indian" for federal purposes. However, states vary considerably in how they address Indian status in state-law contexts — including state court jurisdiction, taxation, and adoption — and some states have enacted their own Indian child welfare statutes that extend protections beyond federal ICWA minimums.

Encyclopedia Cross-Reference

Indian Land Law — Tribal Trust Land, Allotment, and the Indian Reorganization Act (The Law Mind Property Law Encyclopedia)
Indian Tribes and Constitutional Law — Sovereignty, Plenary Power, and Treaty Rights (The Law Mind Constitutional Law Encyclopedia)
Adoption — Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) and Tribal Adoption (The Law Mind Family Law Encyclopedia)

INDIANmain

Anderson's Dictionary of Law • 1890

Indent. n. Any contract or obligation in writing; but may have a narrower signification.1 Includes descendants of Indians who have an admixture of white or negro blood, provided they retain their distinctive character as members of the tribe from which they trace descent.2 The United States adopted the principle originally established by European nations, that the aboriginal tribes were to be regarded as the owners of the territories they respectively occupied. See DISCOVERY, 1. Indians who maintain their tribal relations are the subjects of independent governments, and as such not in the jurisdiction of the United States, because the Indian nations have always been regarded as distinct political communities between which and our government certain international relations were to be maintained. These relations are established by treaties to the same extent as with foreign powers. They are treated as sovereign communities, possessing and exercising the right of free deliberation and action, but, in consideration of protection, owing a qualified subjection to the United States.4 If the tribal organization of Indian bands is recognized by the political department of the National government as existing; that is to say, if the government makes treaties with and has its agent among them, paying annuities, and dealing otherwise with "head men" in its behalf, the fact that the primitive habits and customs of the tribe have been largely broken into by intercourse with the whites, does not authorize a State government to regard the tribal organization as gone, and the Indians as citizens of the State where they are and subject to its laws.5 When members leave their tribe and become merged into the mass of the people they owe complete 1 Nichol v. Henry, 89 Ind. 54, 58-59 (1883); Bedford v. Tupper, 30 Hun, 176 (1883). See also 35 Ala. 23; 50 Ga. 327; 19 III. 486; 29 La. An. 116; 31 id 33; 44 Mich. 123; 46 Mo. 472; 87 N. Y. 257; 16 Ohio St. 548; 76 Pa. 398; 82 id. 116; 11 W. N. C. 567; 24 Vt. 327, 338; 4 Biss. 437, 445; Cooley, Torts, p. 387, cases. 2 Wall v. Williams, 11 Ala. 836 (1847). See Relation of Indians to Citizenship, 7 Op. Att. Gen. 746, 750 (1856); Campan v. Dewey, 9 Mich. 435 (1861). 3 United States v. Rogers, 4 How. 567 (1846): Johnson v. M'Intosh, 8 Wheat. 574, 584 (1823); United States v. Kagama, 118 U. S. 381-82 (1886); 3 Kent, 378; 2 Washb. R. P. 521. 4 Exp. Reynolds, 18 Alb. Law J. 8 (U. S. D. C., W. D. Ark., 1878), Parker, J. See also Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 5 Pet. *16 (1831); Worcester v. Georgia, 6 id. 515, 584 (1832); Dred Scott v. Sandford, 19 How. 403 (1856); Cherokee Trust Funds, 117 U. S. 288 (1886); 2 Story, Const. §§ 1097-1100; 3 Kent, 308-18; 50 Mich. 585, * The Kansas Indians, 5 Wall. 737, 756 (1866), Davis, J.

INDIANmain

Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928

chase money of land by instalments it is said that the promises to pay those instalments which become due before the date set for the delivery of the deed are absolute and independent, and in no way affected by a failure to deliver the deed at the time specified. But where the deed is to be de- livered simultaneously with the payment of the last instalment, then on payment of the previous instalments the tender of the deed and the tender of the last instalment become mutual concurrent conditions; 13 Pick. 281; 84 Ill. 448; 5 id. 561; 39 id. 354; Harr. Cont. 156. Where a contract is made for the sale of goods to be delivered in instalments each to be paid for on delivery, it was held that the promises were dependent, and the failure to deliver one instalment as stipu- lated released the other party from the obligation to accept future deliveries; 115 U. S. 188. In this case the supreme court reviewed the English cases and considered the doctrine of Hoare v. Rennie, 5 H. & N. 19, as better supported by English authority than Simpson v. Crippin, L. R. 8 Q. B. 14, and Brandt v. Lawrence, 1 Q. B. Div. 344; the case relied upon to establish this view was Bowes v. Shand, 2 App. Cas. 455, and it was considered as not contravened by Mersey Co. v. Naylor, 9 App. Cas. 434. See, also, 97 N. Y. 216; 12 R. I. 82; 60 Pa. 182; contra, 2 Allen 492; 25 Am. L. Reg. N. S. 59; 21 id. 398, n. See, generally, Leake, Cont. 344-356; Langd. Sum. Cont. 105-147; Harr. Cont. 152, 160; Cutter v. Powell, and notes, 2 Sm. L. Cas., 9th Am. ed. 1212; Benj. Sales, Ben- nett's ed. B. 4, pt. 1, and note; 3 B. & S. 751; 82 L. J. Q. B. 204; 11 H. L. Cas. 337.

INDIANmain

Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928

The name of the aboriginal inhabitants of America. In general, Indians have no political rights in the United States; they cannot vote at the general elections for officers, nor hold office. In New York they are con- sidered as citizens, and not as aliens, owing allegiance to the government and entitled to its protection; 20 Johns. 188, 633. But it was ruled that the Cherokee nation in Georgia was a distinct community; 6 Pet. 515. See 8 Cow. 189; 9 Wheat. 673; 14 Johns. 181, 332; 18 id. 506. The title of the Indians to land was that of occupation merely, but could be divested only by purchase or conquest; 2 Humph. 19; 1 Dougl. 546; 2 McLean 412; 8 Wheat. 571; 2 Washb. R. P. 521; 3 Kent 378. By act of March 3, 1871, no Indian na- tion or tribe within the United States shall be recognized as an independent nation with whom it may contract by treaty, but prior treaties are not to be thereby impaired. By act of March 8, 1885, any Indian com- mitting upon the person or property of another Indian or any other person, mur- der, manslaughter, rape, assault with in- tent to kill, arson, burglary, or larceny, within any territory and within or without an Indian reservation, is subject to the laws of the territory, and shall be tried in the same manner and be subject to the same penalties as other persons charged with the same crimes; and if such offence be com- mitted within a reservation in a state, he shall be subject to the same laws, etc., as if it were committed within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States. This act was held constitutional in 118 U. S. 375. See 151 U. S. 577; 81 Fed. Rep. 625. The crime of murder committed by one Cherokee Indian upon the person of another within the jurisdiction of the Cherokee nation is not an offence against the United States; 163 U. S. 376. The indictment, the venue of the trial, and the jury on the prosecution of an Indian for murder committed in a territory are to be according to the territorial laws; 130 U. S. 343. See 2 Harv. L. Rev. 169; Rep. Am. Bar Assn. 1891, 261. The provisions in the treaty of February X

INDIANn.

Websters Unabridged Dictionary (1913) • 1913

Of or pertaining to India proper; also to the East Indies, or, sometimes, to the West Indies. Of or pertaining to the aborigines, or Indians, of America; as, Indian wars; the Indian tomahawk. Made of maize or Indian corn; as, Indian corn, Indian meal, Indian bread, and the like. [U.S.] Indian bay (Bot.), a lauraceous tree (Persea Indica).  -- Indian bean (Bot.), a name of the catalpa.  -- Indian berry. (Bot.) Same as Cocculus indicus.  -- Indian bread. (Bot.) Same as Cassava.  -- Indian club, a wooden club, which is swung by the hand for gymnastic exercise.  -- Indian cordage, cordage made of the fibers of cocoanut husk.  -- Indian corn (Bot.), a plant of the genus Zea (Z. Mays); the maize, a native of America. See Corn, and Maize.  -- Indian cress (Bot.), nasturtium. See Nasturtium, 2.  -- Indian cucumber (Bot.), a plant of the genus Medeola (M. Virginica), a common in woods in the United States. The white rootstock has a taste like cucumbers.  -- Indian currant (Bot.), a plant of the genus Symphoricarpus (S. vulgaris), bearing small red berries.  -- Indian dye, the puccoon.  -- Indian fig. (Bot.) (a) The banyan. See Banyan. (b) The prickly pear.  -- Indian file, single file; arrangement of persons in a row following one after another, the usual way among Indians of traversing woods, especially when on the war path.  -- Indian fire, a pyrotechnic composition of sulphur, niter, and realgar, burning with a brilliant white light.  -- Indian grass (Bot.), a coarse, high grass (Chrysopogon nutans), common in the southern portions of the United States; wood grass. Gray.  -- Indian hemp. (Bot.) (a) A plant of the genus Apocynum (A. cannabinum), having a milky juice, and a tough, fibrous bark, whence the name. The root it used in medicine and is both emetic and cathartic in properties. (b) The variety of common hemp (Cannabis Indica), from which hasheesh is obtained.  -- Indian mallow (Bot.), the velvet leaf (Abutilon Avicennæ). See Abutilon.  -- Indian meal, ground corn or maize. [U.S.] -- Indian millet (Bot.), a tall annual grass (Sorghum vulgare), having many varieties, among which are broom corn, Guinea corn, durra, and the Chinese sugar cane. It is called also Guinea corn. See Durra.  -- Indian ox (Zoöl.), the zebu.  -- Indian paint. See Bloodroot.  -- Indian paper. See India paper, under India.  -- Indian physic (Bot.), a plant of two species of the genus Gillenia (G. trifoliata, and G. stipulacea), common in the United States, the roots of which are used in medicine as a mild emetic; -- called also American ipecac, and bowman's root. Gray.  -- Indian pink. (Bot.) (a) The Cypress vine (Ipomoea Quamoclit); -- so called in the West Indies. (b) See China pink, under China.  -- Indian pipe (Bot.), a low, fleshy herb (Monotropa uniflora), growing in clusters in dark woods, and having scalelike leaves, and a solitary nodding flower. The whole plant is waxy white, but turns black in drying.  -- Indian plantain (Bot.), a name given to several species of the genus Cacalia, tall herbs with composite white flowers, common through the United States in rich woods. Gray.  -- Indian poke (Bot.), a plant usually known as the white hellebore (Veratrum viride).  -- Indian pudding, a pudding of which the chief ingredients are Indian meal, milk, and molasses.  -- Indian purple. (a) A dull purple color. (b) The pigment of the same name, intensely blue and black.  -- Indian red. (a) A purplish red earth or pigment composed of a silicate of iron and alumina, with magnesia. It comes from the Persian Gulf. Called also Persian red. (b) See Almagra.  -- Indian rice (Bot.), a reedlike water grass. See Rice.  -- Indian shot (Bot.), a plant of the genus Canna (C. Indica). The hard black seeds are as large as swan shot. See Canna.  -- Indian summer, in the United States, a period of warm and pleasant weather occurring late in autumn. See under Summer.  -- Indian tobacco (Bot.), a species of Lobelia. See Lobelia.  -- Indian turnip (Bot.), an American plant of the genus Arisæma. A. triphyllum has a wrinkled farinaceous root resembling a small turnip, but with a very acrid juice. See Jack in the Pulpit, and Wake-robin.  -- Indian wheat, maize or Indian corn.  -- Indian yellow. (a) An intense rich yellow color, deeper than gamboge but less pure than cadmium. (b) See Euxanthin.

INDIANn.

Websters Unabridged Dictionary (1913) • 1913

A native or inhabitant of India. One of the aboriginal inhabitants of America; -- so called originally from the supposed identity of America with India.

indiannoun

Wiktionary (English) • 2026

Wiktionary contributors • CC BY-SA 4.0 • via Kaikki
Extracted and formatted for display by Law Mind. Source link opens the current Wiktionary page and its contributor history; it is not a frozen copy of this extract.

Alternative letter-case form of Indian (“indigene”).

Indianadj

Wiktionary (English) • 2026

Of or relating to India or its people; or (formerly) of the East Indies. | Eastern; Oriental. | Of or relating to the indigenous peoples of the Americas. | Made with Indian corn or maize. | Designating any of various chess openings now characterised by black's attempt to control the board through knights and fianchettoed bishops rather than with a central pawn advance.

Indiannoun

Wiktionary (English) • 2026

A person from India. | An American Indian, a member of one of the indigenous peoples of the Americas (generally excluding the Aleut, Inuit, Metis, and Yupik). | An indigenous inhabitant of Australia, New Zealand or the Pacific islands. | Ellipsis of Indian cuisine. | Ellipsis of Indian meal (“meal consisting of Indian cuisine”). | Ellipsis of Indian restaurant (“restaurant serving Indian cuisine”). | Ellipsis of Mardi Gras Indian. | A kind of marble (spherical toy) with colored bands on an opaque black base.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

Subscribe Encyclopedia Sign In