Definition
"For greater caution" or "for greater security." A Latin maxim used in legal instruments, pleadings, and conveyancing to signal that a particular clause, provision, or act is included not because it is legally required, but as an added precaution — to forestall doubt, close a gap, or reinforce what the law might already supply. The phrase characterizes something as precautionary surplusage: present for certainty's sake, not necessity's.
The term appears most commonly in two contexts:
1. DRAFTING AND CONVEYANCING: A clause described as inserted in majorem cautelam is one the drafter included out of abundant caution. Its inclusion does not imply that the law demanded it, and its absence would not have changed the legal position. Courts may treat such clauses as non-operative, refusing to allow them to expand or restrict the instrument's legal effect beyond what would otherwise apply.
2. PROCEDURAL AND PLEADING CONTEXTS: An allegation or recital described as made in majorem cautelam is offered by way of additional protection — typically to guard against a technical objection — without conceding that the additional material was legally necessary. The party does not waive any position by including it.
The practical import in both contexts is the same: the thing done in majorem cautelam is legally harmless as a statement of what the law requires, but strategically useful as a hedge against unforeseen objection.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): No entry. The phrase has no general circulation outside of legal and historical contexts.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): No entry. Treated as a term of art.
The phrase is pure legal Latin with no meaningful common-language counterpart. The nearest vernacular equivalent — "just to be safe" or "out of an abundance of caution" — captures the spirit but entirely loses the legal precision: that the act or clause carries no independent operative legal weight and is not to be construed as an admission that it was required.
---
Common Confusion
Do not confuse in majorem cautelam with ex abundanti cautela, a closely related phrase meaning "out of abundant caution." The two are functionally synonymous and appear interchangeably in older sources, but ex abundanti cautela is more commonly encountered in modern legal writing and in ecclesiastical law contexts, while in majorem cautelam predominates in older English common law and conveyancing materials. Neither phrase carries independent operative legal weight, but researchers indexing or searching the corpus should run both terms when tracing precautionary clause usage across periods.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers encounter this phrase most often in older English and American legal materials — particularly in conveyancing, ecclesiastical law, and early equity practice — where Latin maxims were woven into instruments and pleadings as a matter of course. Recognizing in majorem cautelam is essential for correctly interpreting the operative weight of a clause. A provision inserted in majorem cautelam should not be read as evidence that the drafter believed additional authority was needed; courts historically declined to give such clauses independent legal force.
The phrase can also signal a drafting convention that tells you something about the instrument's era. Heavy reliance on in majorem cautelam language is a marker of older practice; modern drafters achieve the same effect by labeling provisions "for the avoidance of doubt" or through savings clauses — language worth cross-referencing when tracing the evolution of a document form.
Trap for historical research: Because the phrase appears in argument (as in the cited reference, 1 Strange 105, arg.), researchers should be careful to distinguish its use in counsel's argument — where it characterizes the posture of a pleading or clause — from its use in an instrument itself. The argumentative use does not create a rule; it invokes a recognized principle.
Corpus connection: This maxim sits in a family of Latin precautionary and interpretive maxims that appear throughout the early common law reports and equity practice materials in the Law Mind corpus. Related maxims from the same cluster — particularly in majore summa continetur minor — appear in the same source passages and may be encountered on adjacent pages of older reporters and digests.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
All four source dictionaries agree on the core translation: "for greater security" (Black's 1st and 2nd, Bouvier) or "for greater caution" (the more literal rendering implied by cautelam). The agreement is complete and the definitions are uniformly terse.
Burrill's entry is the most useful for research purposes, as it situates the phrase in its broader lexical neighborhood, noting adjacent maxims in the same reporters. Burrill also flags that the neighboring maxim in majore summa continetur minor was "singularly mistranslated" in Branch and Wharton — a caution worth heeding for researchers using those secondary compilations for the surrounding material.
What the historical dictionaries do not supply: any developed explanation of how courts treated in majorem cautelam clauses, or the limits courts placed on their operative effect. For that doctrinal content, researchers must go to the primary sources and to conveyancing treatises of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
---