Definition
In delicto (Latin: "in fault") is a term describing a party who bears some degree of fault, guilt, or culpability in connection with an illegal, wrongful, or prohibited act. It functions primarily as a descriptive status — identifying that a party was implicated in the wrong at issue — rather than a precise legal standard of its own.
The term appears most frequently in contrast with, or as a component of, the doctrine of in pari delicto ("in equal fault"), which governs the legal consequences when multiple parties share responsibility for an illegal transaction or wrongful act. A party may be in delicto without being in pari delicto: the former establishes that some fault exists; the latter addresses whether that fault is equivalent across parties.
---
Common Confusion
IN DELICTO vs. IN PARI DELICTO: These phrases are often used interchangeably in legal writing and older case reports, but they carry distinct meanings. In delicto simply means "in fault" — it says nothing about how one party's fault compares to another's. In pari delicto means "in equal fault" and invokes a specific equitable defense that can bar a plaintiff from recovering when both parties are equally culpable. The practical significance is that being in delicto does not automatically defeat a claim; the degree of fault matters. As Story's Equity Jurisprudence notes, parties can both be in delicto while standing in very different degrees of guilt — a distinction that can determine whether relief is available to the less culpable party.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers will rarely encounter in delicto standing alone in modern legal materials. Its primary function in contemporary doctrine is as a building block of the in pari delicto analysis, and most modern courts and commentators fold the concept directly into that framework without isolating the term. When you see in delicto in older equity opinions or treatises, it is almost always setting up a comparative fault analysis — asking not just whether the plaintiff was at fault, but how deeply, and whether relief should be withheld on that basis.
In historical sources, the phrase appears in equity courts addressing illegal contracts, fraud, and claims where plaintiffs were themselves participants in the wrongdoing. Kent's Commentaries uses in delicto to describe parties acting within a prohibited course of conduct, and Story's Equity Jurisprudence deploys it precisely to distinguish degrees of culpability before reaching the in pari delicto bar. Researchers working in pre-twentieth-century equity materials should read in delicto as a threshold characterization, not a dispositive one.
The term also surfaces in civil law scholarship and in treatises drawing on Roman law foundations, where delictum referred broadly to a private wrong giving rise to an obligation. In that context, in delicto carried a broader sense of "implicated in a civil wrong" rather than only an illegal or criminal act. Researchers moving between common law and civil law materials should be alert to this wider usage.
One practical trap: Black's Law Dictionary and Bouvier both treat in delicto as essentially a cross-reference to in pari delicto, which can cause researchers to skip past the term without recognizing that older equity opinions used it independently to analyze partial fault, unequal culpability, and the availability of relief to a less-guilty plaintiff. The nuance matters: courts of equity sometimes granted relief to a party in delicto precisely because that party was not in pari delicto with the opposing party.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The three shelf sources agree that in delicto means "in fault" but diverge in depth. Black's and Bouvier treat the term as a mere pointer to in pari delicto, offering no independent analysis. Burrill's is the most substantive of the three, drawing on Story and Kent to make the critical point that in delicto and in pari delicto are not synonymous — that parties can share fault without sharing it equally, and that this distinction carries legal consequences.
Burrill's formulation, quoting Story, is genuinely instructive: "Where both parties are in delicto, concurring in an illegal act, it does not always follow that they stand in pari delicto; for there may be, and often are, very different degrees in their guilt." This passage captures the analytical role the term played in equity practice and explains why in delicto was worth naming separately from its better-known companion doctrine.
What the historical sources collectively miss is any treatment of in delicto in the civil law sense — as a descriptor drawn from Roman delict doctrine. Researchers working in mixed-jurisdiction or civil law contexts will need to supplement the common law shelf sources with civil law materials to capture that fuller usage.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Defenses — Unclean Hands and In Pari Delicto (Contracts & Commercial Law Encyclopedia)
---