IN ARTICULO MORTIS - The Law Mind Legal Dictionary

IN ARTICULO MORTISAuthored

The Law Mind • 1098 words

Definition

Latin: "in the article of death." At the point of death; in the very act or moment of dying. The phrase describes the condition of a person who is at the threshold of death — not merely ill or aged, but imminently and immediately dying.

The phrase appears most prominently in two legal contexts:

1. Dying declarations. A statement made in articulo mortis by a person who believes death is imminent may qualify for admission as evidence under the dying declaration exception to the hearsay rule. The dying-declaration doctrine rests on the premise that a person on the verge of death has no motive to lie and is under an obligation equivalent to an oath.

2. Gifts causa mortis. A gift made in articulo mortis — in contemplation of imminent, specific death — is the defining factual predicate for a gift causa mortis, which is distinguished from an ordinary inter vivos gift by the donor's expectation of death and the gift's revocability upon survival.

Common Language

Modern common usage (Wiktionary): "At the moment of death." In canon law, the phrase can also describe special dispensations or permissions granted to a person shortly before death, such as ordination or religious profession.

Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Not separately defined; the phrase was treated as a recognized Latin legal expression with self-evident meaning to educated readers.

Editorial note: The common usage captures the literal temporal sense accurately. The legal significance, however, is not merely descriptive — in articulo mortis is a term of art that triggers specific doctrinal rules. Whether a person was legally "in articulo mortis" is a factual and sometimes contested threshold question, not simply a narrative observation about when something occurred.

Common Confusion

In articulo mortis is frequently paired with, or confused with, two related but distinct Latin phrases:

- Causa mortis ("on account of death") describes the motive or occasion for an act — typically used in "gift causa mortis" to mean a gift made in anticipation of death from a specific, present peril. A gift causa mortis requires that the donor be in articulo mortis or at minimum apprehend imminent death, but the phrases are not interchangeable. Causa mortis is the legal classification; in articulo mortis is the factual condition.

- In extremis ("in extreme circumstances" or "at the last extremity") is often used interchangeably with in articulo mortis in older legal writing. Some authorities treat the terms as synonymous; others reserve in extremis for a broader condition of severe illness not necessarily at the immediate moment of death. Researchers should not assume equivalence when the distinction matters, as in the dying declaration context where imminence is a critical threshold.

Why It Matters in Research

The phrase operates as a factual trigger in at least two distinct doctrinal areas — evidence law (dying declarations) and property law (gifts causa mortis) — and researchers must identify which context governs before interpreting a source.

In historical sources, in articulo mortis appears without doctrinal elaboration. Older dictionaries simply define it as "at the point of death" and move on. The analytical work — what that condition must look like, how imminence is measured, who bears the burden of proof — is found in case law and treatises, not in the Latin phrase itself.

For gifts causa mortis, the connection between in articulo mortis and revocability is critical and easy to overlook in older sources. A gift made in articulo mortis is automatically revoked if the donor survives the peril that prompted it. This distinguishes it sharply from an inter vivos gift, which is irrevocable upon delivery. Researchers working on estate disputes involving deathbed transfers must trace whether the donor was genuinely in articulo mortis, because the answer determines which legal regime — and which set of formalities and presumptions — applies.

In the dying declaration context, modern evidence codes (including Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(2)) have codified and in some respects narrowed the common law rule. Historical sources written before codification may describe the doctrine more expansively. Researchers using pre-twentieth century materials should verify whether the rule as stated survives in the jurisdiction of interest.

The canon law usage noted in Wiktionary — dispensations granted in articulo mortis — appears in ecclesiastical and civil law sources but is largely absent from Anglo-American common law dictionaries. Researchers working with ecclesiastical records, wills involving religious bequests, or canon law materials should be alert to this distinct usage.

Historical Dictionary Support

All five source dictionaries agree on the core definition: "in the article of death; at the point of death." Black's (both editions) and Burrill each cite the same New York report, 1 Johns. 159, confirming that the phrase had early American judicial recognition. Bouvier defines it only briefly, defining the phrase and immediately moving to the next entry. Rapalje & Lawrence's entry is corrupted in the available text — the definition is interrupted by matter from an unrelated entry — but the phrase itself appears correctly rendered.

None of the historical dictionaries explains the doctrinal consequences of the condition. They treat in articulo mortis as a translatable Latin phrase rather than as a term of legal art requiring further elaboration. This is a consistent gap across the shelf: the dictionaries confirm meaning but leave the legal significance entirely to case law and treatise sources.

Black's (both editions) append the maxim "In atrocioribus delictis punitur affectus licet non sequatur effectus" immediately after the in articulo mortis entry with no explanation of the connection. This appears to be a typographical artifact of the original dictionary's layout, not a substantive linkage. Researchers should not read any doctrinal relationship between the two.

Jurisdictional Note

The dying declaration doctrine and the gift causa mortis doctrine both exist across most common law jurisdictions, but their precise requirements vary. In the United States, the dying declaration exception under the Federal Rules of Evidence applies only in homicide prosecutions and civil cases, a restriction not shared by all state formulations or by the historical common law rule. Requirements for gifts causa mortis — particularly what degree of peril and imminence satisfies in articulo mortis — are determined by state law and vary meaningfully.

Encyclopedia Cross-Reference

The Law Mind Property Law Encyclopedia: Personal Property — Gifts (Inter Vivos, Causa Mortis — Delivery, Intent, Acceptance) [property_133]

IN ARTICULO MORTISmain

Black's Law Dictionary • 1891

In the arti- cle of death; at the point of death. 1 Johns. 159. In atrocioribus delictis punitur affec- tus licet non sequatur effectus. 2 Rolle R. 82. In more atrocious crimes the intent is punished, though an effect does not follow.

IN ARTICULO MORTISmain

Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) • 1910

In the article of death; at the point of death. Jackson v. Vredenbergh, 1 Johns. (N. ¥.) 159. In atrocioribus delictis punitur affeotus licet non sequatur effectus. 2 Rolle R. 82. In more atrocious crimes the intent is punished, though an effect does not follow.

IN ARTICULO MORTISmain

Rapalje & Lawrence • 1888

- At the not in his capacity of king, but as if he were an point of death. ordinary mesne lord; this was called tenure ut de persond. These distinctions were formerly important, for tenure ut de corond involved many burthensome incidents which tenants of the king by tenure ut de honore and ut de persond were free from, because they did not become tenants of the king by their own free will. (See LIVERY.) IN AUTER, or AUTRE, DROIT. - Originally each of these tenures was called a In atrocioribus delictis punitur affectus licet non sequatur affectus (2 Roll. 82): In more atrocious crimes the intent is punished, though an effect does not follow. In another's right. IN BANCO, or BANC.-See BANC. IN BANK NOTES CURRENT IN NEW YORK, (in a statute). 19 Johns. (N. Y.) 146. IN BLANK.--An indorsement of a bill or note, consisting merely of the indorser's name. (2 Steph. Com. 164.) Called "blank," from the blank space left over it. IN BONIS.-Among the goods, or property; in actual possession. Inst. 4, 2, 2. tenure in capite, but about Henry VIII.'s reign the term in capite ceased to be applied to tenure ut de honore and ut de persona, (so where the king was lord of an ancient borough, the tenants in burgage were not called tenants in socage in capite (Co. Litt. 77 a,)) and became appropriated to tenure in capite ut de corond, and it is this tenure to which the act 12 Car. II. refers when it abolishes tenure in capite. At the present day, therefore, there is no distinction between tenures of the crown. See Co. Litt. 77 a, 108 a, and Hargrave's notes. Mr. Madox's remarks on this subject are singularly narrow-minded. IN CAPITE, TENURE (in a statute). Davies 160. IN CASE, (in a will). 8 Pet. (U. S.) 348; 59 IN BRICKS, (in a contract). 3 Bouv. Inst. Pa. St. 70. 629 п. IN CAMERA.-In England, a case is said to be heard in camerd when the judge either hears it in his private room, or causes the doors of the court to be closed, and all persons, except those concerned in the case, to be excluded. This is done where it is in the public interest that the facts of the case should not be published, especially in divorce cases, but it is not clear whether the court can do so as a matter of course in any case. See Nagle Gillman v. Christopher, 4 Ch. D. 173. IN CAPITA.-Among heads. According to the number of individuals, or to the polls. IN CAPITE, IN CHIEF, or EN CHEF, originally meant "directly," "immediately," sine medio, sans mesne. (Madox Bar. Ang. 164.) Hence "tenure in capite" primarily means the tenure of very lord and very tenant (q. v.), or the relation between a tenant and his immediate feudal superior, as opposed to a mesne tenure, (Britt. 100a; see MESNE); but the phrase was always applied especially to land held directly of the crown, (Co. Litt. 108a; Wright Ten. 161,) and at the present day it is used exclusively in that sense. See TENURE. 2. Tenure in capite, however, even when confined to the crown, is an ambiguous expression. Formerly land might be held directly of the king in three manners: First, it might have been originally granted to the tenant by the king in his capacity of king or lord paramount; this was called tenure ut de corond; secondly, an honor, castle or manor held by a private person might come into the hands of the crown (e. g. by escheat), so that the persons holding lands of the honor became tenants of the king in his capacity of lord of the honor; this was called tenure ut de honore; thirdly, if A. held land of B., a private person, in gross, and B.'s seigniory escheated to the crown, then A. became tenant of the king, IN CASE ANY SHOULD DIE, (in a will). 4 Munf. (Va.) 328. IN CASE OF A LOSS OR DISPUTE, (in an insurance policy). 1 Wils. 129. IN CASE OF DEATH, (in a will). L. R. 8 Eq. 52; 1 Swanst. 162, 164. In casu extremæ necessitatis omnia sunt communia (Hale P. C. 54): In cases of extreme necessity, everything is in common. IN CHIEF.-See EXAMINATION, & 3. In claris non est locus conjecturis: In things obvious there is no room for conjecture.

in articulo mortisadv

Wiktionary (English) • 2026

Wiktionary contributors • CC BY-SA 4.0 • via Kaikki
Extracted and formatted for display by Law Mind. Source link opens the current Wiktionary page and its contributor history; it is not a frozen copy of this extract.

At the moment of death. (In law, especially canon, or church, law, this expression can mean that someone has been given special permission by a competent authority to enter an organization or to receive some sort of exemption or permission at some point not long before they die, such as receiving diaconal or presbyteral ordination or entering religious profession.)

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

Subscribe Encyclopedia Sign In