Definition
Importunity (also rendered "importunity" in standard spelling) refers to pressing, persistent solicitation — an urgent and often troublesomely repeated appeal, request, or demand made upon another person. In legal contexts, the term describes a form of pressure that, while falling short of duress or coercion, may nonetheless be relevant to questions of undue influence, testamentary capacity, will contests, and the validity of contracts or conveyances obtained through persistent and wearing entreaty.
The legal significance of importunity is not that asking persistently is itself unlawful, but that importunity may supply evidence that a grantor, testator, or contracting party acted not from free and independent will but from the exhaustion or surrender that follows relentless pressure. Courts historically distinguished between lawful persuasion — appeals to reason, affection, or self-interest — and importunity that so wears down resistance as to substitute the importuner's will for the victim's own.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): The quality of being importunate; insistent or aggressive solicitation; the act of pressing someone with urgent, repeated requests or demands.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): "Pressing solicitation; urgency of request or demand; application for a claim or favor which is urged with troublesome frequency or pertinacity."
The gap between common and legal meaning is narrow here, but consequential in application. Ordinary usage treats importunity as a social fault — annoying persistence. Legal usage treats it as a potentially operative fact: when persistent entreaty overcomes the will of a vulnerable person, importunity becomes evidence of undue influence sufficient to vitiate a will, deed, or other legal act. The common meaning describes a manner of asking; the legal meaning can describe a mechanism of legal invalidation.
---
Common Confusion
Importunity is frequently conflated with duress and undue influence, but the three occupy distinct positions on a spectrum of improper pressure. Duress involves compulsion through threatened harm — unlawful in itself. Undue influence is the broader equitable doctrine under which a dominant party substitutes their will for that of a weaker party. Importunity describes one mechanism by which undue influence may be exercised: not through a single act of domination, but through accumulated, wearing pressure. A finding of importunity does not automatically establish undue influence; it is typically one factor among several, including the susceptibility of the subject and the relationship of the parties.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers will encounter "importunity" most frequently in nineteenth- and early twentieth-century will contest cases and chancery decisions involving gifts or conveyances by elderly or infirm grantors. The term functions as a term of art in that literature: when a court found that a will or deed was the product of importunity, it was signaling that the formal requirements of execution might be satisfied but the underlying act of will was compromised.
Two navigational traps deserve attention. First, spelling variation: historical sources use both "importunity" and "importunacy" (the latter now archaic) for the same concept. Search strategies for corpus research should account for both forms, as well as adjectival and adverbial variants ("importunate," "importunately"). Second, modern cases rarely use "importunity" as a standalone term; the concept has been largely absorbed into the broader vocabulary of undue influence doctrine, and contemporary courts more often speak of "persistent pressure" or "wearing down resistance." Researchers working backward from modern doctrine to historical cases may need to translate between terminologies.
The term also appears in equity pleadings as a characterization of how a transaction was induced, and in legislative history concerning solicitation offenses, though the criminal law sense is distinct and should not be imported into the civil context without care.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed., Supplemental) defines importunity as "pressing solicitation; urgent request; application for a claim or favor which is urged with troublesome frequency or pertinacity," deferring expressly to Webster for the definition. This cross-reference to a general dictionary rather than a legal source is itself informative: the term carried its common meaning into legal usage largely intact, with legal significance supplied by context and doctrine rather than by any specialized legal redefinition.
The historical dictionaries do not supply a formal legal test for when importunity rises to actionable undue influence. That analytical work was done by courts rather than lexicographers, and researchers should expect to find the doctrine developed in case law rather than in the dictionary literature. The absence of a doctrinal entry in standard historical legal dictionaries reflects the term's status as a factual characterization rather than a freestanding legal concept with defined elements.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The relevance of importunity to undue influence doctrine is consistent across common law jurisdictions, but the weight given to importunity as a standalone factor varies. Some courts treat persistent solicitation as nearly sufficient, particularly where the testator or grantor was elderly or ill; others require evidence of a confidential relationship or active procurement before importunity becomes legally significant.
---