Definition
An archaic Latin term appearing in early medieval European legal texts with two distinct meanings that must be distinguished by context:
1. (To impound) To place livestock or other property in a pound — an enclosed space where stray or distrained animals were held until claimed or forfeited. This usage corresponds to the modern concept of impoundment.
2. (To impale) To kill or wound a person or animal by causing them to fall upon a paling, stake, or pointed fence. This usage appears in early Germanic and Lombard law codes as a named category of injury or death, triggering specific compensatory obligations.
The two meanings are not related in substance; they happen to share a Latin orthographic form and appear in different legal contexts. Researchers must identify which sense is operative from the surrounding source material.
---
Common Confusion
The double meaning of IMPALARE is a genuine trap. Rapalje & Lawrence and Bouvier both record only the impoundment sense, citing Du Cange. Burrill records only the wounding/killing sense, citing the Lex Burgundionum, Lex Ripuaria, and Leges Langobardorum. A researcher relying on a single dictionary source risks misreading the term entirely. The two senses are not variants of one meaning — they describe entirely different legal concepts in entirely different bodies of law.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This term is unlikely to appear in any modern legal instrument. Its research significance is entirely historical and confined to the study of early medieval Germanic and Lombard law, and to scholarship on the feudal institution of the pound.
For researchers working in early European legal history, the impalement sense is embedded in the wergild and compositio framework of the barbarian law codes. The cited sources — the Lex Burgundionum (title 23, section 2), the Lex Ripuaria (title 70, section 3), and the Leges Langobardorum (book 1, title 19, law 10) — use IMPALARE to describe a specific mechanism of accidental or deliberate death by impalement on a paling or fence structure, with attendant compensation schedules. These are primary sources in Latin; researchers without access to the original law codes should approach secondary translations with care, as the term may be rendered variously as "impale," "stake," or simply absorbed into a description of the wound.
For researchers working on the law of distress and impoundment, the Du Cange sense connects IMPALARE to the cluster of Latin terms for pound-related actions (see also IMPARCAMENTUM, IMPOUNDMENT). Bouvier and Rapalje & Lawrence treat this as the primary meaning, and it aligns with the English legal term "impound" by derivation. This sense is more likely to surface in post-Conquest English legal Latin than the Germanic injury sense.
The divergence between dictionaries here is not a scholarly dispute — it reflects the fact that these compilers were drawing on entirely different source bodies. Neither set of sources is wrong; the term simply carried different freight in different legal traditions. Cross-referencing Burrill against Du Cange directly will resolve ambiguity in most cases.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The three source dictionaries divide cleanly. Bouvier and Rapalje & Lawrence, both drawing on Du Cange's Glossarium Mediae et Infimae Latinitatis, render IMPALARE as "to impound," with no further elaboration. This is the briefest possible treatment — a one-line gloss pointing back to Du Cange.
Burrill takes a different path, defining the term as "to impale; to kill or wound by falling upon a paling," and anchoring the definition in three named barbarian law codes. This is the more substantively developed entry among the three, and it is the only one that engages the term's use as a legal category of injury rather than a procedural act relating to property.
No dictionary provides extended analysis, and none acknowledges that the other sense exists. This is a case where the historical dictionaries, taken individually, each provide accurate but partial information. Taken together, they reveal a term that requires contextual disambiguation before any interpretive work can proceed.
---