L. The same. Referring to a volume, the same series or set; also, the same book or page. Abbreviated id. Compare Is. Ibidem. In the very same place: the same section, page, or book. Abbreviated ibid., ib. Idem sonans. Sounding the same; substantially identical in sound. Plural idem sonantia. Applies to the names of persons substantially the same in sound, though different in spelling. In searches for liens, all spellings of a name which are pronounced alike are to be noted; and in pleadings, substantial identity in sound is generally sufficient. Difference of meaning in the original language, as in the German, is not material. Appearance and sound, alone, are important. The initial being the same, allowance must be made for slight differences in the spellingto which the eye will be directed. Then, a slight difference should put one on inquiry. But the rule does not apply to judgments entered in different initials from those which are usual in English: as, in Yoest for Joest." 1 Wood v. Fowler, 26 Kan. 690 (1882), cases: 14 Rep. 267. Myer v. Whitaker, 15 Abb. N. C. 176 (1878), cases; Stevens v. Kelley, 78 Me. 450 (1886), cases: 35 Alb. Law J. 42-3 (1887), cases. Examples of not fatal variances: Bupp and Bopp; 1 Charleston and Charlestown; Heckman and Hackman; Hutson and Hudson; Japheth and Japhath; Jeffers and Jeffries; Lewis and Louis; Penryn and Pennyrine; & Ricketts, Rickets, and Ricket; Shaffer and Shafer; 10 Woolley and Wolley.11 Examples of fatal variances: Hanthorn and Hawthorn; 12 Spintz and Sprinz; 13 Whortman and Workman.14 A name need not be correctly spelled in an indict ment. When substantially the same sound is preserved, variant orthography makes no difference. 16 Whether one name sounds like another may be a question for a jury.18 If the two names, spelled differently, do not neces sarily sound alike, the question whether they are idem sonans is one of fact for the jury.17 See NAME, 1.