ICIDE

2 definitions found across Law Mind sources

ICIDEAuthored
The Law Mind • 970 words
Definition
A suffix-form term used in legal and quasi-legal contexts to denote the killing of a person or thing identified by the root word. *Icide* does not function as a standalone legal term but as a productive element that generates compound legal terms. The primary compounds recognized in law include: 1. HOMICIDE — the killing of a human being by another human being; the broadest legal category, encompassing lawful and unlawful killing alike. 2. SUICIDE — the intentional taking of one's own life; historically a crime at common law, now treated primarily in civil, insurance, and public health contexts. 3. INFANTICIDE — the killing of an infant, often carrying distinct statutory treatment from general homicide. 4. FETICIDE (also spelled foeticide) — the destruction of a fetus; a term that has gained significant modern legal currency in abortion-related statutes and criminal law. 5. MATRICIDE, PATRICIDE, PARRICIDE, FRATRICIDE — killings of specific family members; relevant mainly in aggravated homicide statutes and in historical legal texts where enhanced punishment attached to kin-killing. 6. REGICIDE — the killing of a king or sovereign; a concept with deep historical legal significance in English law but rarely encountered in modern statutory criminal codes. 7. GENOCIDE — the systematic destruction of a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group; a term of twentieth-century international law with treaty and customary law dimensions. ---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): *-icide* as a suffix meaning "killer of" or "killing of," derived from Latin *-cida* (killer) and *-cidium* (killing), used freely in English to form words indicating destruction of a person, group, or thing. Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): The suffix appears in Webster's 1913 as a combining form meaning "a killer" or "a killing," with examples including homicide, suicide, and regicide. No standalone entry for *icide* appears; it functions only in combination. The gap between common and legal usage is structural, not semantic: ordinary English freely generates new *-icide* compounds (e.g., pesticide, herbicide, bactericide) to describe any destruction, including of non-human life. Legal usage, by contrast, treats only a limited set of *-icide* compounds as terms of art carrying defined elements, mens rea requirements, and distinct procedural consequences. A researcher encountering a new *-icide* compound in a legal text must determine whether it functions as a term of art with settled legal meaning or as a descriptive neologism. ---
Common Confusion
Two points of consistent confusion arise. First, researchers sometimes treat all *-icide* compounds as equivalent in legal weight. They are not. *Homicide* and *genocide* carry exhaustive doctrinal frameworks; *feticide* varies sharply by jurisdiction and era; *regicide* is largely historical. Second, the suffix generates terms in medical jurisprudence and forensic pathology that shadow but do not always match the corresponding legal terms — *feticide*, for example, has a clinical meaning that may differ from its statutory definition in a given jurisdiction. ---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers working in Law Mind's corpus will encounter *-icide* compounds across multiple doctrinal contexts that do not always cross-reference each other. Criminal law materials organize around *homicide* and its subdivisions; international law materials organize around *genocide*; historical materials may use *infanticide*, *parricide*, or *regicide* in ways that reflect now-defunct aggravated-punishment regimes. The terms do not share a unified index entry in most historical digests. Two traps are especially common in historical sources. First, early American and English materials use *homicide* as a genus term encompassing what modern law separates into murder, manslaughter, and justifiable killing. Finding *homicide* in an eighteenth-century source tells you a killing occurred; it does not tell you whether the act was criminal. Second, *infanticide* in nineteenth-century legal texts often refers specifically to concealment of birth statutes — a distinct offense from outright child-killing — because proof of live birth was difficult and concealment was separately criminalized. For corpus navigation: entries on individual *-icide* compounds are the operative research units. This entry functions as a gateway term. Follow the cross-references to the substantive entries, particularly HOMICIDE, which anchors the doctrinal tree, and GENOCIDE, which sits in a wholly separate international law context. ---
Historical Dictionary Support
Bouvier's Law Dictionary does not carry a standalone entry for *icide*. The provided source material for this entry (the Bouvier excerpt on *fetura* and *fetus*) is unrelated to *icide* as a legal term and appears to have been supplied in error or as adjacent material. No synthesis from that excerpt is possible or appropriate. What Bouvier does provide, across its main body, are individual entries for the principal compounds — HOMICIDE receiving the most extensive treatment, organized around the traditional divisions of justifiable, excusable, and felonious homicide. Historical dictionaries generally lack entries for the suffix itself, reflecting that pre-twentieth-century legal lexicography treated *-icide* compounds as self-defining or handled them discretely. The absence of a root-suffix entry in Bouvier, Black's early editions, and similar sources is itself informative: the synthetic view of *-icide* as a legal category is a modern organizational convenience, not a historical doctrinal concept. ---
Jurisdictional Note
The legal content carried by specific *-icide* compounds varies significantly by jurisdiction. *Feticide* statutes exist in some U.S. states and are absent in others; their scope relative to abortion law is actively contested. *Infanticide* is a distinct statutory offense in England and several Commonwealth jurisdictions but has no equivalent standalone offense in most U.S. states. Researchers should not assume that a compound recognized in one jurisdiction's statutes exists or carries the same elements elsewhere. ---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
See Law Mind Encyclopedia: Homicide (primary doctrinal entry); Genocide (international law framework); Criminal Law (general context for all *-icide* offenses). ---
Related Terms
Homicide — Murder — Manslaughter — Suicide — Infanticide — Feticide — Parricide — Genocide — Killing — Mens Rea — Malice Aforethought — Corpus Delicti — Criminal Homicide
ICIDEmain
Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928
FETURA (L. Lat.). In Civil Law. The produce of animals, and the fruit of other property, which are acquired to the owner of such animals and property by virtue of his right. Bowyer, Mod. C. L. c. 14, p. 81. FETUS (Lat.). In Medical Juris- prudence. An unborn child. An infant in ventre sa mère. An arbitrary distinction is made by some writers between fætus and embryo, the latter term being used for the product of conception up to the fourth month of gestation and the former term after the fourth month. Although it is often important to know the age of the fœtus, there is great difficulty in ascertaining the fact with the precision required in courts of law. The great difference between children at birth, as regards their weight and size, is an indication of their condition while within the womb, and is a suf- ficient evidence of the difficulty as to the age of the fœtus by its weight and size at different periods of its existence. Thousands of healthy infants have been weighed Immediately after birth, and the extremes have been found to be two and eighteen pounds. It is very rare indeed to find any weighing as little as two pounds, but by no means uncommon to find thom weighing four pounds. So it is with the length, which varies as much as that of the adult does from the average height of the race. Neither can anything positive be learned from the progress of development; for although the condition of the bones, cartilages, and other parts will gen- erally mark with tolerable accuracy the age of a healthy fætus, yet an uncertainty will arise when It is found to be unhealthy. It has been clearly proved, by numerous dissections of new-born children, that the fœtus is subject to diseases which interfere with the proper formation of parts, ex- hibiting traces of previous departure from health, which had interfered with the proper formation of parts and arrested the process of development. Interesting as the different periods of develop- ment may be to the philosophical inquirer, they cannot be of much value in legal inquiries from their extreme uncertainty in denoting precisely the age of the fœtus by unerring conditions.. See Amer. Text Book Obstetrics 1 Beck, Med. Jur. 249; Billord on Infants, Stewart trans. 86, 87, and App.; Ryan, Med. Jur. 187; 1 Chitty, Med. Jur. 403; Dean, Med. Jur.; 2 Witth & Beck. Med. Jur. 201. And see the articles BIRTA. DEAD-BORN; EN VENTRE SA MERE; FOETICIDE; INFANTICIDE; LIFE;

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In