Definition
A term with several distinct legal meanings, the primary of which is a building used or designed for human habitation. Courts and legislatures have applied the word with varying breadth depending on context.
1. Dwelling place. In its core legal sense, a house is a structure built and used for human residence — a home. This meaning anchors the term in property law, landlord-tenant law, criminal law (particularly burglary), and constitutional protections against unreasonable search and seizure. Courts have long held that "house" is not synonymous with "dwelling-house," though the two substantially overlap: "house" is the broader term, and "dwelling-house" the narrower.
2. Building more generally. In certain statutory and contractual contexts, "house" extends to structures not used as residences — a warehouse, a counting-house, a storehouse. Courts have recognized this broader sense while noting that the presumptive, prima facie meaning remains a dwelling.
3. A legislative assembly. "House" refers to a chamber of a bicameral legislature — most prominently the U.S. House of Representatives or a state lower chamber. This usage has no direct property law implications but appears in constitutional and procedural contexts.
4. A household, family, or commercial firm. In older usage and in certain legal instruments, "house" could denote the persons comprising a household or a business establishment (e.g., "a merchant house" or "the house of [family name]").
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): A structure built or serving as an abode of human beings; also an apartment building within a public housing estate; a container housing another object; or an entire residential building as opposed to an individual apartment.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): A structure intended or used as a habitation or shelter for animals or, especially, human beings; a dwelling place; also used in reference to household affairs and domestic concerns.
The gap between common and legal meaning lies primarily in precision. In everyday speech, "house" and "home" are often interchangeable, and the word comfortably extends to any residential structure including apartments. In legal analysis, the distinction between "house," "dwelling-house," and "building" can be outcome-determinative — particularly in burglary, where the scope of the protected structure defines criminal liability, and in conveyancing, where a grant of a "house" may or may not carry outbuildings, curtilage, or garden depending on the jurisdiction and instrument.
---
Common Confusion
House vs. Dwelling-house. Historically, "dwelling-house" was the more technically precise term in criminal law and real property, requiring actual use as a residence. "House" was understood to be broader — it could encompass structures not presently inhabited or not exclusively residential. Researchers encountering burglary statutes or property conveyances must attend carefully to which term the source uses, as the legal consequences differ. Modern statutes often collapse the distinction, but older authorities do not.
House vs. Building. "House" is narrower than "building." All houses are buildings, but not all buildings are houses. Courts construing statutes or instruments that use one term rather than the other have refused to treat them as interchangeable.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Burglary definitions. The word "house" is central to the common law definition of burglary (breaking and entering the dwelling-house of another). Whether a structure qualifies as a "house" for burglary purposes has generated substantial case law, and the answer shifts between jurisdictions and across time. Researchers using historical sources must track the precise statutory language in force at the relevant date.
Conveyancing and grants. In property instruments, the word "house" has been interpreted to carry the curtilage and garden even without express mention of appurtenances. This is not universally true in modern instruments and varies by jurisdiction. Historical authorities (Bouvier, Burrill) record the older rule; modern treatises may depart from it.
Constitutional search and seizure. The Fourth Amendment's protection of the "house" is not identical to its protection of a generic building or commercial premises. The corpus distinction between "house" and other structures matters when researching expectation-of-privacy doctrine.
Fair Housing and housing regulation. In modern statutory law, "house" and "housing" appear in a distinct regulatory vocabulary — the Fair Housing Act, affordable housing statutes, inclusionary zoning ordinances — that is only loosely related to the private-law definitions catalogued in the historical dictionaries. Researchers moving between common law property sources and federal or state housing regulation should not assume definitional continuity.
Legislative usage. When "House" appears in constitutional or procedural texts referring to a legislative chamber, it is a different term of art entirely. Context resolves the ambiguity, but researchers searching historical corpus sources should be alert to false hits.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The historical dictionaries largely agree on the core meaning — a structure for human habitation — while noting important qualifications. Burrill's is the most precise, quoting Pollock C.B.'s observation that "house, prima facie, means a dwelling-house," while immediately flagging the countervailing authority that it does not necessarily mean precisely that. Black's (both editions) and Bouvier's independently confirm this tension between the presumptive and the extended sense.
Bouvier adds the dimension of "house" as a collective noun — a household, a family, a commercial firm — that the other dictionaries treat less fully. This meaning surfaces in older legal instruments and should not be dismissed as mere metaphor when it appears in source texts.
What the historical dictionaries largely omit: the modern regulatory and constitutional housing law context, which had not fully developed at the time of their drafting. They are reliable on property conveyancing rules, somewhat useful on criminal law, and silent on fair housing, zoning, and the administrative law of housing policy. Researchers should not expect them to speak to those questions.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The scope of "house" for burglary purposes varies significantly by state, particularly regarding whether attached garages, outbuildings within the curtilage, or temporarily unoccupied structures qualify. Modern statutory reform has produced a range of definitions across jurisdictions. In conveyancing, whether a grant of a "house" carries ancillary structures depends on state property law and the specific instrument.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
The Law Mind Property Law Encyclopedia: Landlord-Tenant — Discrimination in Housing (Fair Housing Act)
The Law Mind Property Law Encyclopedia: Affordable Housing — Inclusionary Zoning and Density Bonuses
The Law Mind Constitutional Law Encyclopedia: The Fair Housing Act — Constitutional Framework and Disparate Impact
---