Definition
Horn with horn is an archaic legal phrase describing the promiscuous or intermixed grazing of horned cattle belonging to different owners upon the same common pasture. The term captures two related but distinct situations:
1. The general condition of horned cattle from multiple tenants feeding together without separation on a shared common.
2. More specifically, the intercommoning of horned cattle arising from common pur cause de vicinage — that is, the customary right by which cattle lawfully put on one common were permitted to stray onto an adjoining common, with each community of owners tolerating the other's animals in return.
The phrase is documentary rather than doctrinal — it appears in old records and pleadings as a description of actual grazing practice, not as a term of art creating independent legal rights.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): No entry. The phrase carries no independent modern meaning outside historical legal and agricultural contexts.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): No entry. The phrase was not in general circulation as an English idiom; it was a term of record confined to manorial and common-land documentation.
The gap here is one of survival rather than divergence: the phrase never developed a common-language counterpart because the agricultural practice it described — communal open-field grazing with livestock intermixed — largely disappeared with enclosure. A researcher encountering the phrase in a modern context has almost certainly stumbled into a historical document.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This is a term you will encounter in manorial court rolls, estreats, and pleadings related to common rights disputes, not in modern case law or statutes. Several research traps are worth flagging:
Confusion with common of pasture generally. Horn with horn describes a fact — cattle intermixed — not the underlying right. The right itself is common of pasture (appendant, appurtenant, or in gross) or common pur cause de vicinage. Finding this phrase in a source tells you the nature of the use, not the nature of the title.
The vicinage connection is the more legally consequential aspect. Common pur cause de vicinage was a recognized doctrine in English common law by which adjoining commoners had reciprocal tolerance for straying livestock. Horn with horn in this context signals a pleading or record grounded in that doctrine, which required proof of adjacency, custom, and the absence of enclosure between the two commons.
Enclosure history matters. After parliamentary enclosure became widespread in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the conditions giving rise to horn with horn were eliminated or converted to individual title. Sources using this phrase almost certainly predate or resist enclosure on the specific land in question.
Jurisdictional transfer to American materials is minimal. American colonial land law occasionally borrowed English common-right concepts, but horn with horn as a recorded phrase is almost exclusively an English manorial and common-law phenomenon. Researchers in American property history may encounter the underlying doctrine of intercommoning without this specific label.
Spelman, Cowell, and Blount — the sources cited by Burrill — are themselves historical glossaries of law terms and manorial vocabulary. Tracing the phrase through those sources gives depth on the agricultural and customary law context but will not yield modern authority.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Burrill is the principal English-language legal dictionary source for this phrase, and he relies entirely on three earlier glossarists: Henry Spelman (Glossarium Archaiologicum), John Cowell (The Interpreter), and Thomas Blount (Nomo-Lexicon). All three were seventeenth-century compilers of archaic and law-Latin terms drawn from record evidence. Burrill synthesizes them without contradiction: Spelman and Cowell confirm the general meaning (promiscuous feeding of horned cattle on a common), while Blount adds the specific vicinage dimension.
No divergence among the sources is apparent, which suggests the phrase had a stable and narrow usage within record practice. What the historical dictionaries collectively miss is any discussion of how the phrase interacted with pleading requirements in common-right actions — a gap that a researcher must fill from the broader treatise literature on commons and vicinage (Bracton, Coke on Littleton, and the later common-field scholarship of the nineteenth century).
The phrase does not appear in modern legal dictionaries precisely because the agricultural conditions it described, and the record-keeping practices that captured it, ceased to generate new litigation.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Horn with horn is a term of English common and manorial law with no meaningful American doctrinal counterpart. Researchers in English property history, land registration, and commons law will encounter it; American researchers working on colonial or early national property disputes may encounter the underlying intercommoning doctrine under different terminology.
---