Definition
Hibitionem is a Latin term appearing in the phrase "non obstante hibitionem" (or variants thereof), meaning "notwithstanding the prohibition." In medieval and early common law pleading, the term functioned as part of a formal response to a writ of estrepement — a writ directed at preventing waste to land during pending litigation. The full plea "non fecit vastum contra hibitionem" translates as "he did not commit waste against the prohibition," and was the standard defense entered by a tenant or party accused of committing waste in defiance of a judicial prohibition.
The term is not a standalone legal concept but a component of formal Latin pleading language. It derives its legal significance entirely from its use in this specific procedural context.
---
Common Confusion
Hibitionem should not be read as a freestanding noun equivalent to "prohibition" in the general legal sense. The Latin "prohibitionem" was the more standard term for writs or orders of prohibition. "Hibitionem" in the sources appears as an elided or abbreviated form — likely a scribal or typographical variant — and is functionally tied to the estrepement plea context. Researchers encountering this form should not treat it as interchangeable with the broader doctrine of prohibition writs.
The Black's 2nd edition source entry shows signs of corrupted or compressed typesetting (e.g., "NON H2ZC IN FODERA VENI"), which indicates the surrounding text may contain additional related plea forms that have been garbled in reproduction. Researchers should treat transcriptions of this section with caution.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This term is a research artifact as much as a legal concept. Researchers will encounter "hibitionem" almost exclusively in:
1. Transcriptions of Black's Law Dictionary (2nd ed.) and its predecessors, where the Latin plea forms for waste and estrepement are catalogued together in compressed entries.
2. English common law pleading manuals and commentaries drawing on Blackstone's Commentaries (3 Bl. Comm. 226–227), which is the cited authority in the Black's entry.
3. Historical court records involving writs of estrepement, most commonly in chancery or common law property disputes from the medieval through early modern English period.
The primary research trap is typographical corruption in digitized sources. The Black's 2nd edition entry containing "hibitionem" is embedded in a compressed cluster of Latin plea terms, and OCR processing of older dictionary scans frequently garbles these entries. If you are searching a digital corpus for this term and its cognates, expect variant spellings, fused words, and missing characters. Always verify against a physical or high-quality facsimile copy.
The substantive legal context — the writ of estrepement and the plea of non-waste — belongs to a body of property law that was largely obsolete by the time American jurisdictions matured. Researchers working in early American colonial property records may encounter these forms in transplanted English pleading practice, but the procedural machinery behind them rarely survived into 19th-century American doctrine.
The phrase connects directly to the broader law of waste (permissive, voluntary, and ameliorating), to the role of injunctive and quasi-injunctive writs in equity practice, and to the history of real property actions in the English common law system.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd ed.) does not give "hibitionem" its own headword entry. The term appears embedded in the entry for "NON INTROMITTANT CLAUSE" and the associated plea forms, where Black's cites Blackstone's Commentaries at 3 Bl. Comm. 226–227 for the proposition that "non fecit vastum contra hibitionem" was the proper plea in an action founded on a writ of estrepement.
No other historical dictionary on the Law Mind shelf assigns this term a dedicated entry. Its absence from Bouvier's Law Dictionary and other standard references confirms that it was not treated as a term of art in its own right, but as a unit of pleading formula. The Black's 2nd edition entry is thus the primary — and for practical purposes, sole — historical dictionary authority.
The condition of the surrounding text in the Black's entry (with apparent OCR artifacts and garbled Latin phrases) limits the reliability of the digitized source for this cluster of terms. Researchers should weight Blackstone's original text more heavily than the dictionary transcription when reconstructing the procedural context.
---
Jurisdictional Note
This plea form belongs to English common law pleading and has no recognized American statutory or case law development. It is historically relevant only to English and early colonial practice. No American jurisdiction adopted the writ of estrepement in its classical form.
---