Definition
A Scots law term for the crime of assaulting or beating a person within their own home. The offense is distinct from ordinary assault by virtue of its location: the victim's dwelling is treated as a place of special security and sanctuary, and to violate that sanctuary through violence constitutes an aggravated wrong. The home-invasion character of the offense is what elevates it beyond a simple battery or assault.
Also spelled HAMESUCKEN (the more common variant in Scots legal sources) and occasionally HAMESECKEN.
---
Common Confusion
HAIMSUCKEN and HAMESUCKEN are variant spellings of the same offense. Bouvier's redirects entirely to HAMESUCKEN, and Burrill's treats haimsucken as the entry form while cross-referencing hamesecken. Researchers encountering either spelling in historical texts are looking at the same legal concept. Neither spelling should be confused with modern English housebreaking or burglary, which focus on unlawful entry and theft rather than the assault of a person inside their home.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This term appears almost exclusively in Scots law sources and in English legal dictionaries that incorporated Scots terminology. Researchers working in early Scottish legal records, criminal indictments, or treatises on Scottish criminal law will encounter both spelling variants — haimsucken, hamesucken, and hamesecken — and must recognize all three as referring to the same offense. Searching only one spelling in archival or corpus sources will produce incomplete results.
The term has essentially no presence in English common law as a recognized offense. When it appears in English-language legal dictionaries, it is typically as a brief descriptive entry acknowledging a Scots institution rather than as part of a living English legal doctrine. Researchers should not assume that finding the term in a general legal dictionary implies any application in English or American jurisdictions.
The conceptual core — aggravated assault by reason of the sanctity of the home — does have echoes in modern doctrine, but those doctrines travel under entirely different names (home invasion, aggravated burglary, curtilage doctrine). A researcher tracing the intellectual history of the home-as-sanctuary principle in criminal law should use haimsucken/hamesucken as a historical data point, not as operative modern terminology.
Bell's Dictionary of the Law of Scotland is the primary cited authority in all major legal dictionaries on this point. Skene's older derivation (noting the term as "ane Dutch word" from haim, home, and suchen, to seek) is preserved in Burrill's and provides useful context for understanding the word's structure when encountering it in very early Scots texts.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The four source dictionaries are in close agreement: all define haimsucken as an assault committed against a person in their own home under Scots law, and all cite Bell as authority. There is no substantive disagreement among them, only variation in spelling and in the depth of treatment.
Burrill's is the most informative of the four, adding Skene's etymological observation and cross-referencing the hamesecken spelling. Bouvier's is the least informative, offering only a redirect to hamesucken. Neither Black's first nor second edition expands beyond the one-sentence definition.
What the historical dictionaries collectively omit is any discussion of the punishment, the procedural history of the offense in Scots courts, or how the offense compared to related aggravated assault doctrines elsewhere. Researchers needing that depth must go directly to Bell's Dictionary of the Law of Scotland or to primary Scots criminal law treatises.
---
Jurisdictional Note
This is a term of Scots law with no recognized counterpart in English common law or American law. It appears in American and English legal dictionaries as a historical and comparative entry only. Its legal significance is confined to Scotland and to historical scholarship on Scots criminal law.
---