Definition
Gii (also encountered in older sources as part of the broader *action of gii*) is an archaic common law form of action that lay against a person who falsely boasted or publicly gave out that he or she was married to the plaintiff, where such false claim threatened to produce a common reputation of marriage between the parties. The action protected individuals — particularly women — from the reputational and legal consequences that could flow from another person's false assertion of a marital relationship.
The harm addressed was not merely embarrassment but a concrete legal and social danger: in a period when reputation for marriage carried consequences for property rights, inheritance, dower, and the capacity to contract a valid subsequent marriage, an unchecked false claim of marriage could compromise a plaintiff's legal standing and social position.
---
Common Confusion
Gii is sometimes loosely grouped with defamation actions in historical surveys, but it is technically distinct. Defamation addressed false statements harmful to general reputation; gii addressed the specific false claim of marital status, which carried its own peculiar legal consequences independent of whether the statement would otherwise be considered defamatory. Researchers should not assume that gii cases appear under defamation headings in historical court records or digests — they may be indexed separately or under marriage-related actions.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This term is almost exclusively of historical and antiquarian legal interest. Researchers are unlikely to encounter it in modern case law or statutes. Its relevance surfaces in three contexts:
1. **Historical common law research.** Anyone tracing the evolution of actions protecting marital reputation, or studying the precursors to modern alienation of affection or slander of title actions, may encounter gii in Year Books, early English reports, or Blackstone's Commentaries (3 Bl. Comm. 93).
2. **Women's legal history.** Because women bore the primary practical harm from false claims of marriage — in terms of dower rights, property capacity, and eligibility for remarriage — gii appears in scholarship on women's access to legal remedies in early English law.
3. **Corpus traps.** The term is rare and orthographically variable. Historical legal manuscripts and early printed reports may render it inconsistently. Researchers searching Law Mind's historical corpus should run variant searches and should not rely on a single spelling to capture all relevant materials. The term also appears embedded in longer passages describing the *præcipe* forms of action (note the truncated entry in Black's, which runs directly into *prælo-*, suggesting the original source was a continuous list of archaic actions).
The Black's Law Dictionary entry is notably brief and appears mid-list, indicating the compilers treated gii as one of several obsolete forms catalogued for completeness rather than practical utility. Do not expect deeper treatment in standard historical dictionaries.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary provides the only substantive entry among the shelf sources, defining gii as an action against one who "boasted or gave out" a false marriage to the plaintiff, with citation to Blackstone's Commentaries at 3 Bl. Comm. 93. The entry is compressed and appears in a list context, suggesting Black's was itself drawing on Blackstone rather than independent case authority.
Blackstone's treatment is the primary historical source for understanding this action. His discussion situates gii among the personal actions protecting reputation and social standing, distinct from the real actions concerning land and property. No significant divergence appears among historical dictionaries on the core meaning, largely because so few sources address the term at all. What historical sources miss is any sustained analysis of how the action was actually pleaded, what damages were available, or how frequently it was brought — gaps that reflect both the action's rarity in practice and the limited survival of relevant records.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Gii was an English common law action and has no direct analog in American law. American jurisdictions did not transplant this specific form of action, though some of its protective concerns were absorbed — imperfectly and indirectly — into actions for slander (false imputation of unchastity), breach of promise of marriage, and later alienation of affection. Researchers working in American legal history should treat gii as English-only for practical purposes.
---