"The right to gananicas is founded in the partnership which is supposed to exist between husband and wife, because, she bringing her fortune in dote, gift and paraphernalia, and he his in the estate and property which he possesses, it is directed that the gains, which result from the joint employment of this mass, be equally divided." 1 That property which husband and wife, living to gether, acquire during matrimony by a common title, lucrative or onerous; or that acquired by either or both, by purchase or industry; also, the fruits of the separate property which each brings to the matrimony or acquires by lucrative title during the continuance of the partnership. The gain is common to both.2 Originally, a piece of money current at Venice; next the price at which Garnishment. The process of warning sheets of news were sold; then the sheets or citation.4 Originally, a notice to a person not a party to a suit, to appear in court and explain his interest in the subject-matter of the litigation or to furnish other information. Now, the act or proceeding of attaching money or property belonging to a judgment debtor but in the possession of a third person. Otherwise known as factorizing," "garnishee," or "trustee process.” In the nature of an equitable attachment of the debt or assets of the principal defendant in the hands of a third person. Its object is to reach such assets and apply them in discharge of the principal debt." 1 [Cutter v. Waddingham, ante. themselves.6 The official publication of the English government; also called the "London Gazette." It is evidence of acts of state, and of all political acts performed by the Queen; orders of adjudication in bankruptcy are also published in it. "When the defendant cannot be found to be served with a subpœna in chancery, a day for him to appear, being first appointed, is inserted in the Lon1 Strickland v. Maddox, 4 Ga. 394 (1848); Western R. Co. v. Thornton, 60 id. 306 (1878); Curry v. Woodward, 50 Ala. 260 (1873); Harris v. Miller, 71 id. 32 (1881); Rose v. Whaley, 14 La. An. 374 (1859); Schindler v. Smith, 18 id. 479 (1866); Perkins v. Guy, 2 Monta. 20 (1873); Oregon R. & Nav. Co. v. Gates, 10 Oreg. 515 (1882); Godding v. Pierce, 13 R. I. 533 (1882); Steen v. Norton, [Cartwright v. Cartwright, 18 Tex. 634 (1857), Hemp45 Wis. 414 (1878); Bickle v. Chrisman, 76 Va. 691 (1882). hill, C. J. *F. garnir: A. S. warnian. See G. * [Smith v. Miln, 1 Abb. Adm. 280 (1848), Betts, J. * [Welsh v. Blackwell, 14 N. J. L. 348 (1834): 3 Jacob, 175; Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Pennock, 51 Pa. 254 (1865). 622 Alb. Law J. 181 (1880). Bethel v. Judge of Superior Court, 57 Mich. 381 (1885), Champlin, J. 2 Lane's Appeal, 105 Pa. 65 (1884). 3 Miller v. United States, 11 Wall. 297 (1870), Strong, J.; Schuler v. Israel, 120 id. 506 (1887); 24 Am. Law Reg. 625-34 (1885), cases. Inter-State exemptions, 21 Cent. Law J. 425-28 (1885), cases. "Gave all kinde," -1 Coke, Litt. 140 a. See 1 Bl. Com. 75; 2 id. 84; Williams, R. P. 124-26. • Trench, Glossary.