Definition
In property law, "front" refers to that portion or side of a lot, parcel, or tract of land that abuts upon, faces, or provides access to a public highway, street, or other way. It is the side of a property considered to be its primary face toward the public thoroughfare. The term most commonly arises in conveyances, covenants, municipal regulations, zoning ordinances, and assessments for public improvements such as sidewalks or curbing.
The term carries several related but distinct applications in legal contexts:
1. FRONTAGE (property boundary): The linear measurement of a parcel along the street or highway it faces. A deed calling for a lot "fifty feet front" describes the width of the parcel as measured along the street line. Discrepancies between contract descriptions of frontage and deed descriptions are a recognized source of conveyance disputes.
2. CORNER LOT AMBIGUITY: When a parcel abuts more than one street, the question of which side constitutes the "front" becomes legally significant — especially in covenants obligating an owner to maintain sidewalks or fencing "in front" of the property. Courts have held, in some instances, that "front" on a corner lot means the longer side facing a secondary street rather than the principal street frontage, depending on context and the evident purpose of the covenant.
3. ASSESSMENT PURPOSES: Municipal special assessments for street improvements, sidewalks, or sewers are frequently calculated on a front-foot basis — that is, proportionally to the number of linear feet a parcel fronts on the improved street. The determination of which side of a parcel constitutes the assessable "front" directly affects the tax burden.
4. BUSINESS AND CRIMINAL LAW: In a secondary usage, a "front" denotes a legitimate-appearing business or enterprise that conceals unlawful activity — for example, a shell corporation used to launder money or disguise beneficial ownership. This usage is not defined in property dictionaries but appears regularly in criminal law, securities regulation, and fraud litigation.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Located at or near the front; also used to describe vowel sounds produced near the front of the mouth, or the nearest expiring futures contract in commodities trading.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): The forehead or brow; the face above the eyes; personal countenance as expressive of boldness or character. ("Grim-visaged war hath smoothed his wrinkled front.")
The gap between common and legal meaning is meaningful in two directions. In property law, "front" has shed all association with facial features or personal bearing and become purely spatial and relational — the side of land facing a public way. The futures-market usage (the "front month" contract) is a modern financial application that shares the spatial logic of the property term but belongs to an entirely different regulatory context. Researchers encountering "front" in historical legal sources should not assume the physical or physiognomic sense found in period literature.
---
Common Confusion
FRONT vs. FRONTAGE: "Front" describes the side or face of the property; "frontage" describes the linear measurement of that side. The two terms are often used interchangeably in older instruments, but assessments and covenant obligations may turn on the distinction. A deed can describe a lot as having a specific "front" (orientation) without specifying the length of frontage, and vice versa.
FRONT (property) vs. FRONT (criminal/commercial): No formal doctrinal connection exists between the property-law meaning and the criminal-law usage describing a sham business. Context will resolve the ambiguity, but researchers searching historical legal indexes should be alert that both usages appear in legal literature without disambiguation.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The term "front" is deceptively simple and produces research traps across several areas of the Law Mind corpus.
In historical deed and conveyance records, "front" was used loosely — sometimes meaning the street-facing side, sometimes the more prominent side, and sometimes simply width as measured along one boundary. Early American conveyancers borrowed the term from English practice without uniformly defining it, and disputes about what a grantor meant by "fifty feet front" generated significant 19th-century litigation. Researchers working with pre-20th-century conveyances should not assume any single standard definition.
Corner lot cases are a recurring problem in covenant and municipal law research. When a property faces two streets, cases disagree about which face is the "front" for purposes of covenant performance or assessment liability. Bouvier's notes this ambiguity directly, citing Iowa authority for the proposition that "front" on a corner lot may mean a side street. This issue is jurisdiction- and fact-sensitive; do not extrapolate from one state's cases to another's.
The front-foot assessment method was the dominant mechanism for allocating special improvement costs in American municipalities through much of the 19th and early 20th centuries. Significant constitutional litigation developed around front-foot assessments and the due process and equal protection requirements applicable to them. Researchers working on municipal finance, taxation, or takings history will encounter this term repeatedly.
In criminal and regulatory research, "front company" or "front organization" language appears increasingly from mid-20th century onward in organized crime prosecutions, RICO actions, money laundering cases, and securities fraud. The property-law dictionaries do not address this usage; it must be researched through criminal law and regulatory sources.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Bouvier's Law Dictionary provides the authoritative historical definition for property purposes: "that part of [a lot or tract of land] which abuts on, or gives access from, it to a highway whether natural or artificial." Bouvier's is candid about the term's instability, noting that context can shift the meaning — particularly for corner lots, where "front" may refer to the side rather than the principal street face, depending on the nature of the covenant involved.
Bouvier's also flags the practical conveyancing problem: a contract calling for a store "fifty-six feet front and rear" but a deed describing the lot as nineteen feet wide raises a potential failure of description or misrepresentation going to the substance of the bargain. This reflects a recurring 19th-century problem in urban real estate transactions where sellers and buyers used "front" loosely in negotiations and more precise (but sometimes inconsistent) language in deeds.
What historical dictionaries do not address: the criminal-law "front" meaning, zoning and setback applications (a 20th-century development), and any financial-market usage. Researchers relying solely on Bouvier's or similar property dictionaries will find the coverage adequate for land transaction research but incomplete for modern regulatory or criminal contexts.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Determinations of which side of a corner lot constitutes the "front" for covenant or assessment purposes vary by jurisdiction and are heavily fact-dependent. Some states apply a "primary street" test; others defer to municipal designation; still others look to the evident intent of the instrument. Researchers should not generalize from one state's treatment of corner-lot "front" questions to another without independent verification.
---