1. A royal privilege, or branch of the king's prerogative, subsisting in the hands of a subject.2 A special privilege conferred by government upon individuals, and which does not belong to citizens of the country generally, of common right.3 A generic term covering all rights granted to a corporation by the legislature. Whence "corporate franchises." 4 A corporate franchise is a legal estate vested in the corporation as soon as it is in esse. Not a mere naked power, but a power coupled with an interest.5 A privilege conferred by the immediate or antecedent legislation of an act of incorporation, with conditions expressed or necessarily inferential from its language, as to the manner of its exercise and for its enjoyment.6 To ascertain how it is brought into existence, the whole charter must be consulted. Generalized, and divested of the special form which it assumes under a monarchical government based on feudal traditions, a franchise is a right, privilege or power of public concern, which ought not to be exercised by private individuals at their mere will and pleasure, but should be reserved for public control and administration, either by the government or directly, or by public agents, acting under such conditions and regulations as the government may impose in the public interest, and for the public security.7 Such rights and powers must exist under every form of society. They are always educed by the laws and customs of the community. Under our system, their existence and disposal are under the legislative department, and they cannot be assumed or exercised without legislative authority. Thus, no private person can establish a public highway, or a public ferry, or railroad, or charge tolls for the use of the same, or free. Frăn'-chiz. F. franchise, privileged liberty: franc, 22 Bl. Com. 37; 127 U. S. 40. • Bank of Augusta v. Earle, 13 Pet. 595 (1839), Taney, Chief Justice. Atlantic & Gulf R. Co. v. Georgia, 98 U. S. 365 (1878), Strong, J. Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat. 700 (1819), Story, J.; Society for Savings v. Coite, 6 Wall. 606 (1867). See also 3 Kent, 458; 73 III. 547; 45 Mo. 20; 15 Johns. 387. • Woods v. Lawrence County, 1 Black, 409 (1861), Wayne, J. California v. Pacific R. Co., 127 U. S. 40 (1888), Bradley, J. exercise the right of eminent domain or corporate capacity, without authority from the legislature, direct or derived.¹ The word is used as synonymous with privilege and immunity of a personal character; but in law imports something which the citizen cannot enjoy without legislative grant. What members obtain in a relig. ious, benevolent, or scientific association incorporated under general or special laws, is membership.2 A corporation is itself a franchise belonging to the members of the corporation, and the corporation, itself a franchise, may hold other franchises. The different powers of the corporation are franchises. The essential properties of corporate existence are quite distinct from the franchises of the corporation. The franchise of being a corporation belongs to the corporators, while the powers and privileges vested in, and to be exercised by, the corporate body as such, are the franchises of the corporation. The latter has no power to dispose of the franchise of its members, which may survive in the mere fact of corporate existence, after the corporation has parted with all its property and all its franchises. The franchise to be a corporation is not a subject of sale and transfer, unless made so by a statute, which provides a mode for exercising it.4 Often synonymous with rights, privileges, and immunities, though of a personal and temporary character; so that, if any one of these exists, it is loosely termed a "franchise." But the term must always be considered in connection with the corporation or property to which it is alleged to appertain. The franchises of a railroad corporation are the rights or privileges which are essential to the operations of the corporation, and without which its road and works would be of little value; such as the franchise to run cars, to take tolls, to appropriate earth for the bed of its road, or water for its engines, and the like. These are positive rights or privileges without the possession of which the road could not be successfully worked. But immunity from taxation is not a franchise. 5 The franchises of a railroad company are in a large measure designed to be exercised for the public good, which exercise is the consideration for granting them. The company cannot, therefore, render itself incapable of performing its duties, or absolve itself from the obligation, without the consent of the State. A franchise is property and nothing more; it is in1 California v. Pacific R. Co., ante. * Board of Trade v. People, 91 III. 82 (1878), cases, Scott, J. * Pierce v. Emery, 32 N. Η. 507 (1856), Perley, C. J. 4 Memphis R. Co. v. Commissioners, 112 U. S. 619 (1884), cases, Matthews, J.; Willamette Manuf. Co. v. Bank of British Columb