Definition
Foris familiation (also spelled forisfamiliation) is a concept from historical civil and Scots law referring to the formal separation of a child from the father's household and family unit. The act typically involved the child receiving a portion of the family estate — most commonly through a gift, settlement, or advancement during the father's lifetime — and thereafter being excluded from further inheritance claims against the father's estate. A child who had undergone foris familiation was called forisfamiliatus: one who was no longer reckoned among the potential heirs.
The concept operated on the logic that a child who had already received his or her share of the family patrimony during the father's lifetime had, in effect, been "paid out" of the inheritance. The separation was legal and economic as much as it was domestic: it severed the child's future claim on the estate while simultaneously releasing that child from the obligations and dependencies of remaining within the family legal structure.
---
Common Confusion
Foris familiation is not the same as disinheritance. Disinheritance is a unilateral act by a testator cutting a potential heir out of a will, typically without prior conveyance of property. Foris familiation implies a completed transaction — the child has already received value — and the exclusion from future inheritance follows as a legal consequence of that transaction, not as a punitive act. The distinction matters when reading historical sources: a child described as forisfamiliatus was not necessarily disgraced or disfavored; the status might reflect nothing more than that the child had received an advancement and established an independent household.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This term appears almost exclusively in historical sources dealing with Scots law, older English common law, and medieval civil law. Researchers encountering it in primary sources — particularly in texts touching on succession, feudal tenure, or family settlements — should treat it as a signal that they are dealing with a pre-modern inheritance framework substantially different from anything in contemporary Anglo-American law.
The closest surviving analogue in modern law is the doctrine of advancement, which governs whether an inter vivos gift to a child should be treated as a prepayment of inheritance. Bouvier himself flags this connection explicitly. Researchers moving from a foris familiation discussion into modern doctrine should pivot immediately to advancement and hotchpot rules, which are the functional descendants of this concept in American and English inheritance law.
Watch for terminological drift in historical dictionaries: the Latin forisfamiliatus (the person) and foris familiation (the act or status) are sometimes used interchangeably in secondary sources, which can blur the analytical distinction between the transaction and its legal effect on the child's standing as an heir.
Scots law researchers should note that foris familiation had more developed and formal treatment in the Scottish legal tradition than in English common law. Sources drawing on Bell or other institutional Scots writers may use the term with greater precision than English common law sources, where the concept was largely absorbed into or displaced by equitable doctrines of advancement.
The fragment in Bouvier's entry — which runs directly into the separate term FORISJUDICATIO — is a common artifact of older dictionary formatting and should not be read as suggesting any substantive connection between foris familiation and forejudgment.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Bouvier is the primary historical English-language law dictionary source for this term. His entry is brief and largely derivative, citing Bell (a Scots institutional writer), Tomlin's Law Dictionary, Du Cange's medieval Latin glossary, Spelman's Glossarium, and Cowel's Interpreter — a spread of sources that reflects the term's primarily civil and Scots law provenance rather than any deep English common law pedigree.
Bouvier's analogy to the "modern practice of advancement" is the most useful editorial gloss in the entry. It correctly identifies the functional continuity even as the formal doctrine was archaic by the time Bouvier was writing in the nineteenth century.
Historical dictionaries generally treat this term with a light hand, consistent with its status as a learned borrowing from civilian and Scots sources rather than a workhorse term of English common law practice. Researchers should not expect robust treatment in standard English common law dictionaries; the more substantive discussions appear in Scots institutional writers and in works dealing with feudal property law.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Foris familiation as a live legal doctrine is essentially confined to historical Scots law and medieval civil law contexts. No American jurisdiction employs the term as operative law. The functional doctrine — that an inter vivos advancement may bar or reduce an heir's inheritance claim — survives in American law under the rubric of advancement and hotchpot, but the formal concept of foris familiation as a status is not recognized in modern common law jurisdictions.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
The Law Mind Family Law Encyclopedia — Family Court Jurisdiction and Unified Family Courts (family_214)
---