FINE FOR ALIENATION

4 definitions found across Law Mind sources

FINE FOR ALIENATIONAuthored
The Law Mind • 1039 words
Definition
A fine for alienation was a payment made by a feudal tenant to his lord whenever the tenant wished to transfer his landholding to another person. By substituting a new tenant in his place, the original tenant was effectively breaking the personal bond of tenure that underlay the feudal relationship. The fine was the lord's price for permitting that substitution. It applied principally to tenants holding by knight's service and to tenants in capite holding by socage tenure. The practice is now entirely abolished. The fine was not a penalty in the modern sense. It was a condition — a license fee — without which the transfer could not lawfully proceed. The lord's consent was required because the identity of the tenant mattered: feudal tenure carried personal obligations (military service, homage, fealty), and a lord could not be compelled to accept an unknown or unsuitable person as his tenant without compensation. ---
Common Confusion
The word "fine" here does not mean a punishment or a court-imposed monetary penalty. It derives from the Latin finis — an end or settlement — and in feudal contexts denotes a sum paid to conclude a transaction or obtain a permission. This usage appears across several related feudal terms (fine for non-claim, final concord) and routinely misleads researchers accustomed to the modern meaning. A fine for alienation is closer in function to a modern transfer tax or conveyancing fee than to a criminal or civil fine. ---
Why It Matters in Research
This term is almost exclusively a term of historical English feudal law. Researchers will encounter it in primary sources, treatises, and early American cases discussing the colonial and post-colonial reception of English land law — including disputes over whether feudal incidents survived independence or were extinguished by statute. Several points of navigational importance: First, the fine for alienation was abolished in England by the Statute 12 Car. II c. 24 (the Tenures Abolition Act 1660), which dismantled the entire system of military tenures. After that date, references to the fine in English sources are almost always retrospective or doctrinal, not operative. Any source dated after 1660 that treats the fine as a live legal obligation should be read with care. Second, Burrill notes a critical survival: fines were expressly preserved for copyhold tenures when knight-service tenure was abolished. Copyhold persisted in England until the Law of Property Act 1922. Researchers working in English property records through the early twentieth century may therefore encounter fines for alienation in a copyhold context long after the term appears to have been swept away. Third, early American cases occasionally cited the fine for alienation in disputes over the nature of land grants, particularly where colonial charters or proprietary grants used feudal language. The New York citation in Bouvier (6 N.Y. 467, 495) suggests the concept appeared in American litigation over land title. Researchers in colonial and early American land law should treat the fine as a potential argument — and a potential trap — in chains of title that originate in grants using feudal terminology. Fourth, the analogous French institution (lods et ventes, or similar seigneurial dues on alienation) is relevant for researchers working in Louisiana, Quebec, or other civil-law influenced jurisdictions where seigneurial tenure left documentary traces. ---
Historical Dictionary Support
The three historical dictionaries agree on the essential substance: the fine for alienation was a sum paid to the lord for license to transfer a feudal holding, applicable to knight's service and socage tenure in capite, and abolished by 12 Car. II c. 24. All three cite Blackstone's Commentaries (2 Bl. Comm. 71, 89) as the primary authority, which remains the most accessible explanatory source. Burrill adds the most operationally useful detail: the explicit note that fines were preserved for copyhold tenures after the 1660 abolition, pointing to Stephens's Commentaries as supplementary authority. This survival is absent from Black's entry and understated in Bouvier, making Burrill the more complete source for researchers who need to understand the term's post-abolition life. The Bouvier passage that references "an acknowledgment on record of a previous gift or feoffment" and cites 2 Bla. Comm. 348 belongs to a different legal institution — the fine as a fictional conveyancing device (also called a final concord or a fine sur cognizance de droit). The two uses of "fine" share an etymology but are distinct legal procedures. The presence of this material in Bouvier's entry is a minor editorial confusion that could mislead a researcher scanning quickly. The French analogue noted by Bouvier — a similar seigneurial demand on alienation — is gestured at but not developed. Researchers with civil-law corpus questions will need to look beyond these three dictionaries. ---
Jurisdictional Note
In England, the fine for alienation as a common law incident of tenure was abolished in 1660. Its survival in copyhold tenure continued until copyhold itself was abolished in 1922. In the United States, feudal tenures were generally not received as part of American common law, though feudal terminology in early land grants created litigation. No American jurisdiction currently recognizes anything resembling a fine for alienation as an operative legal obligation. ---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Estates_90: Spendthrift Trusts — Restraints on Alienation and Creditor Access (The Law Mind Trusts, Estates & Probate Encyclopedia) ---
Related Terms
Alienation — the transfer of property rights to another Tenure — the system of landholding that gave rise to the fine Knight's Service — the tenure type most associated with fines for alienation Socage — a distinct tenure form; tenants in capite by socage also owed the fine Copyhold — the tenure in which fines for alienation survived longest in England License to Alienate — the permission the fine purchased Restraint on Alienation — the modern doctrine limiting transfers; conceptually adjacent Final Concord (Fine) — a distinct feudal-era legal instrument sharing the same word Mortmain — another feudal restriction on land transferrequiring separate license Escheat — another consequence of unauthorized or improper transfer of feudal land Feud / Fief — the underlying land interest subject to these incidents Statute of Quia Emptores (1290) — the statute that transformed subinfeudation and affected the context in which alienation fines operated
FINE FOR ALIENATIONmain
Black's Law Dictionary • 1891
A fine anciently payable upon the alienation of a feudal estate and substitution of a new ten- ant. It was payable to the lord by all tenants holding by knight's service or tenants in capite by socage tenure. Abolished by 12 Car. II. c. 24. See 2 Bl. Comm. 71, 89.
FINE FOR ALIENATIONmain
Burrill's Law Dictionary • 1867
In feudal law. A sum of money paid to the lord by a tenant, whenever he had occasion to aliene, or make over his land to another; a sum paid for license to alien the land. One of the incidents of tenure by knightservice. 2 Bl. Com. 71, 72. 1 Steph. Com. 165, 180. Fines were expressly reserved to copyhold tenures, when tenure by knight-service was abolished by the statute 12 Car. II. Hence they are, in general, still payable, in England, to the lord, on the alienation of copyhold estates. 1 Steph. Com. 208. 2 Id. 47, 48. 1 Crabb's Real Prop. 615-628. FINE(or MULCT.) In criminal law and general practice. A payment of money imposed upon a party as a punishment for an offence. A pecuniary punishment imposed by some court of record, and usually under the authority of some statute. See Amercement.-A pecuniary punishment imposed by the judgment of a court, upon a person convicted of crime. Wheeler, J. 14 Texas R. 398. A fine is a judgment, but not such a judgment as can be claimed to bear interest. Id. ibid. Fines are more properly sentences than judgments, in the sense of recoveries in civil actions, Id. 399. **According to Spelman, the word fine was not used in this sense, in England, before the Norman invasion. It was ap-
FINE FOR ALIENATIONmain
Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928
right, and upon a writ requiring the party to per- form his covenant; although a fine may be levied upon any writ by which lands may be demanded, charged, or bound. It has also been defined an ac- knowledgment on record of a previous gift or feoff- ment, and prima facie carries a fee, although it may be limited to an estate for life or in fee-tail. Prest. Conv. 200, 202, 268, 269; 2 Bla. Com. 348. The stat. 18 Edw. I., called modus levandi fines, declares and regulates the manner in which they should be levied and carried on; and that is as follows: The party to whom the land is conveyed or assured commences an action at law against the other, generally an action of covenant, by suing out a writ of præcipe, called a writ of covenant, that the one shall convey the lands to the other, on the breach of which agreement the action is brought. The suit being thus commenced, then follows the licentia concordandi, or leave to compromise the suit. The concord, or agreement itself, after leave obtained by the court: this is usually an acknowl- edgment from the deforciants that the lands in question are the lands of the complainants. The note of the fine, which is only an abstract of the writ of covenant and the concord; naming the parties, the parcels of land, and the agreement. The foot of the fine, or the conclusion of it, which includes the whole matter, reciting the parties, day, year, and place, and before whom it was acknowl- edged or levied. See Cruise, Fines; Bacon, Abr. Fines and Recoveries; Comyns, Dig. Fine. In Corporation Law. A term applied to the charge made against a member of a building and loan association who fails to make his monthly payment when due. It has been lately held, that such fines are not by way of penalty, but are rather to be considered as liquidated damages, fixed by consent of the parties, for the loss sustained by the association by reason of the failure of the defaulting member to make prompt payment, and since such payments are es- sential to the success of the plan of the as- sociation, and for the interest of its mem- bers as a whole, the fines will be enforced, independently of statutory provisions, if reasonable in amount and equitable in their application; 36 S. W. Rep. (Ark.) 1085. This case also holds that a fine of "ten cents per share, to be imposed for each and every month that payment is not made," is reasonable. It has also been held that where the by-law provides for a fine of twenty cents per month on each one hun- dred dollars borrowed, the fine for one month is not repeated and added to that of each succeeding month, but only twenty cents on each one hundred dollars can be imposed in any one month; and when the constitution of a building association pre- scribes the fines to be imposed on delin- quent members, it thereby fixes, the limit beyond which the association cannot go; but it may by by-law waive some part of the fines so authorized, and impose smaller ones, and in that case the by-law will govern; 25 S. E. Rep. (W. Va.) 537. In Criminal Law. Pecuniary punish- ment imposed by a lawful tribunal upon a person convicted of crime or misdemeanor. See Shepp. Touchst. 2; Bacon, Abr. Fines and Amercements; 1 Bish. Cr. L. § 940. It may include a forfeiture or penalty recov- erable in a civil action; 11 Gray 373; 6 Neb. 37. The amount of the fine is frequently left to the discretion of the court, who ought to proportion the fine to the offence. To prevent the abuse of excessive fines, the constitution of the United States directs that "excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." Amendm. to the Constitution, art. 8; Cooley, Const. Lim. 377. This applies to national and not to state legislation; 5 Wall. 480; 7 Pet. 243. The supreme court cannot, on habeas corpus, revise the sentence of an inferior court on the ground that the fine was excessive: 7 Pet. 568. See INDENTURE OF A FINE; COGNISOR; COGNISEÊ; JOINT FINE.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In