Definition
The Felony Act refers specifically to the English statute 33 & 34 Victoria, chapter 23, enacted in 1870, which accomplished two significant reforms to the law of felony in England and Wales. First, it abolished the ancient common law doctrine of forfeiture of property upon conviction for felony — under which a felon's real and personal property escheated to the Crown or to the felon's lord upon attainder. Second, it authorized the appointment of interim curators and administrators to manage the property of convicted felons during and after their imprisonment, ensuring that property did not simply lie unmanaged or fall to waste while the felon was incapacitated.
This is a term of art with a fixed historical referent. "The Felony Act" does not describe a general category of legislation; it names one particular statute. Researchers who encounter the phrase in legal texts should treat it as a proper noun pointing to that specific Victorian-era enactment.
---
Common Confusion
Modern readers sometimes encounter "Felony Act" and assume it refers generically to any statute defining or punishing felonies, or perhaps to a jurisdiction's criminal code. This is incorrect. In legal dictionaries and treatises from the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, "the Felony Act" refers exclusively to 33 & 34 Vict. c. 23. Any broader or generic usage is a misreading of the historical sources.
The statute should also not be confused with the Forfeiture Act 1870, though these names are sometimes used interchangeably in secondary literature — the Felony Act of 1870 and the Forfeiture Act 1870 are the same enactment.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers will encounter this term almost exclusively in English legal materials from the mid-Victorian period through the early twentieth century, particularly in treatises, commentaries, and cases addressing the consequences of felony conviction on property rights. The two most frequently cited secondary sources — Mozley and Whiteley's law dictionary and Stephen's Commentaries on the Laws of England (volume 4) — treat the statute as a landmark reform, and most period sources cite it in that context.
Several research traps apply:
First, the phrase "forfeiture for felony" carries very different meaning before and after 1870. Pre-1870 sources describe an active, harsh doctrine; post-1870 sources describe its absence. A researcher reading across that divide without recognizing the statutory break will misread the state of the law.
Second, American legal materials do not use "Felony Act" as a term of art. The forfeiture-upon-attainder doctrine had its own separate American history and was largely abolished at the federal level by early statutes and constitutional provisions. Encountering "Felony Act" in an American source almost certainly signals that the author is discussing English law or citing an English authority.
Third, the curator and administrator provisions of the Act are less frequently discussed than the forfeiture abolition, but they are substantively important for any research touching on property management during imprisonment, estate administration, or the legal capacity of convicted persons. These provisions are frequently overlooked in summary treatments of the statute.
Fourth, researchers investigating modern felony consequences — disenfranchisement, civil disabilities, collateral consequences — should not treat the Felony Act as directly relevant to contemporary doctrine. Its significance is historical and comparative, not as a living source of law.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary and Bouvier's Law Dictionary are in complete agreement on this entry, and both definitions are essentially identical in substance and nearly identical in wording. Both cite the same two secondary authorities: Mozley and Whiteley's Dictionary of English Law, and volume 4 of Stephen's Commentaries on the Laws of England at pages 10 and 459. This uniformity is consistent with how legal dictionaries of the period treated fixed statutory definitions — there was little room for interpretive variation where the term referred to a single named statute.
Neither dictionary elaborates on the practical operation of the interim curator and administrator provisions, nor do they discuss the political or legal context that produced the statute — specifically, the broader Victorian reform movement that sought to rationalize and humanize the consequences of criminal conviction by separating punishment of the offender from destruction of the family's economic position. Researchers seeking that context must go to the primary treatise sources cited rather than to the dictionary entries themselves.
Neither source addresses the American position on forfeiture, nor do they note that the term would have no operative meaning in American jurisdictions. This silence is expected but worth flagging for cross-jurisdictional research.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The Felony Act is English legislation with no direct American equivalent. American law developed its own, distinct approach to forfeiture upon attainder and to the civil disabilities of convicted felons, shaped by state constitutions and early federal statutes. Researchers applying this term outside the English legal tradition are working in a comparative or historical mode, not with operative domestic authority.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Felony Disenfranchisement and Restoration of Rights — The Law Mind Criminal Law Encyclopedia (for the broader context of civil consequences attached to felony conviction, of which forfeiture was the most severe historical example)
Homicide — Felony Murder Rule — The Law Mind Criminal Law Encyclopedia (for a distinct but related felony doctrine that continues to carry significant modern legal force)
---