Definition
Feasant is an archaic Anglo-French legal term meaning "doing" or "making." It does not stand alone as an independent legal concept but functions as a component of compound legal phrases, most prominently *damage feasant*. In that context, feasant modifies the word "damage" to describe the active commission of an injury — specifically, livestock or animals found trespassing on another's land and causing harm while doing so. The term signals ongoing or present wrongdoing rather than a completed act.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Not a recognized word in modern standard English. No entry in current general dictionaries.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Not recorded as an English word. The term belongs to Law French, the legal dialect derived from Norman French used in English courts for several centuries after the Conquest.
The gap here is total rather than partial: feasant has no life outside the law. Encountering it in any text — historical or modern — signals a legal or quasi-legal context. Researchers who treat it as ordinary French ("faisant," meaning "doing") will reach the correct rough meaning but may miss its specific technical function as a term of art in distress and trespass doctrine.
---
Common Confusion
Feasant is sometimes loosely treated as synonymous with the full phrase *damage feasant*, collapsing the modifier into the concept it qualifies. They are not the same: feasant alone means only "doing," while *damage feasant* is the full legal term describing animals wrongfully on another's land and actively causing injury. The distinction matters in historical sources, where feasant occasionally appears clipped from its parent phrase, risking misreading.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Feasant almost never appears in isolation in primary legal sources. Its research value is almost entirely derivative — understanding it unlocks *damage feasant*, which in turn connects to the old common law remedy of distraint (impoundment of straying animals) and to the broader body of trespass doctrine governing livestock. Researchers working in agricultural law history, early property law, or the law of distress will encounter the phrase repeatedly in English common law materials from the medieval period through the nineteenth century.
The term's Law French origin means it surfaces frequently in pre-modern English case reports and legal treatises where Law French terms were either used directly or anglicized. Researchers relying on modern indexes may miss relevant materials if they search only for the English translation and not the Law French form.
The Second Edition of Black's is more useful than the First on this term: it supplies the operative context ("cattle straying upon another's land") that explains why the word matters, rather than offering only the bare translation. This is a recurring pattern in Black's treatment of Law French terms — the later edition generally adds illustrative context that the earlier edition omits.
No significant evolution of the term itself occurred; feasant is a stable component of a stable phrase. What changed over time was the use of the underlying legal mechanism: distress damage feasant as a self-help remedy declined sharply with the codification of livestock and fencing statutes across common law jurisdictions in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Both editions of Black's agree on the core translation: "doing, or making." The First Edition provides only that gloss, treating feasant as a vocabulary item requiring no further explanation — consistent with how Black's handled many Law French terms it assumed practitioners would encounter in context. The Second Edition improves on this by anchoring the term to its primary usage in *damage feasant* and providing a brief factual illustration involving straying cattle. Neither edition situates the term in the broader history of Law French in English legal practice, nor do they cross-reference the remedy of distress with which *damage feasant* is so closely connected. Researchers needing that context must look beyond these dictionary entries to treatises on common law property and agricultural trespass.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The term and its parent phrase originate in English common law and were received into American, Canadian, and other common law jurisdictions. American use was largely historical; by the late nineteenth century, statutory schemes regulating straying animals had displaced the common law action in most states, making the phrase primarily of historical rather than operational significance in U.S. legal research.
---