EXTRACTA CURIAE

1 definition found across Law Mind sources

EXTRACTA CURIAEAuthored
The Law Mind • 793 words
Definition
Extracta curiae (sometimes rendered "extracta curls" in degraded manuscript or print transcriptions) is a term from old English law denoting the issues or profits derived from holding a court. These profits arose from customary fees — payments collected in the course of administering manorial or local court proceedings — and accrued to the lord or other authority entitled to hold the court. The term refers not to fines or penalties imposed by judicial sentence, but to the incidental revenue generated by the court's operation: filing fees, presentment fees, amercements, and similar customary charges attached to the exercise of court-keeping jurisdiction. ---
Common Confusion
The phrase is occasionally transcribed as "extracta curls" in secondary sources and digitized texts, a corruption introduced by misreading the Latin genitive "curiae" (of the court). Researchers encountering "curls" in this context should treat it as a transcription artifact, not a distinct legal term. The correct form is extracta curiae. ---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers working in medieval and early modern English legal history — particularly records involving manorial courts, leet jurisdiction, or feudal tenure — will encounter extracta curiae as a line item in accounts rendered by stewards, bailiffs, or reeves. It appears in compoti (manorial accounts) alongside headings for rents, fines, and perquisites of court. Several navigational issues arise: First, extracta curiae is closely bound to the concept of "perquisites of court" (perquisita curiae). The two terms are sometimes used interchangeably in later commentary, but in stricter usage extracta curiae refers to the gross proceeds of court-keeping activity, while perquisites may be used more narrowly for specific customary dues. Researchers should check the surrounding account structure to determine which meaning is operative in a given document. Second, the right to receive extracta curiae was itself a property right. A grant of a court carried with it, presumptively, the right to the issues of that court. Disputes over entitlement to extracta curiae could therefore arise in actions touching the franchise or the terms of a manorial grant. This makes the term relevant not only in account rolls but in pleadings and conveyancing documents. Third, the term drops out of active use as manorial courts declined in practical significance through the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. It is almost entirely absent from post-1800 legal literature, meaning researchers must rely on medieval and early modern sources for authoritative usage. Fourth, digitization of historical legal texts has produced numerous corrupted transcriptions of Latin legal phrases, and "extracta curls" is a documented example. Keyword searching in digitized databases using the corrupted form will miss most relevant records; searching both forms, and searching for "extracta curiae" directly in Latin, is advisable. ---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed., Supplemental) provides the only dictionary entry recovered for this term, defining it as "the issues or profits of holding a court, arising from the customary fees, etc." This is a compressed but accurate statement. The definition correctly identifies the two key components: (1) that the source is the act of holding court, and (2) that the revenue arises from customary fees rather than from punitive or judicial awards specifically. No entry for extracta curiae appears in the main body of the leading historical legal dictionaries — it is absent from Cowell's Interpreter, Blount's Nomo-Lexikon, and Jacob's Law Dictionary as separately compiled entries, though the underlying concept is addressed in their treatments of manorial courts and court-leet jurisdiction. This reflects the term's character as accounting vocabulary rather than doctrinal vocabulary: it lived in the rolls and accounts of manorial administration more than in the treatises. Researchers should not treat the brevity of Black's entry as indicating marginal legal significance. The right to hold a court and to receive its profits was a substantial franchise right in medieval English law, carefully tracked in Exchequer and estate records. ---
Jurisdictional Note
Extracta curiae is a term of English law with no direct counterpart in Scots law or the continental civil law tradition. It has no operative significance in modern common law jurisdictions. Its relevance is confined to historical research into English manorial and local court administration. ---
Related Terms
Perquisita Curiae — Perquisites of court; closely related and sometimes synonymous Court Leet — The local court whose proceeds extracta curiae most commonly described Court Baron — Manorial court; another primary context for this term Amercement — One species of charge contributing to the extracta curiae Franchise — The legal right to hold a court and receive its issues Manorial Accounts (Compoti) — Primary documentary source in which the term appears Bailiff — Officer typically responsible for accounting for extracta curiae Issues — Broader term for proceeds or profits arising from legal proceedings or rights

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In