EXPATRIATION - The Law Mind Legal Dictionary

See encyclopedia: Naturalization and Denaturalization -- Congressional Power Over Citizenship →

EXPATRIATIONAuthored

The Law Mind • 1115 words

Definition

Expatriation is the voluntary renunciation of allegiance to one's native or adopted country, accompanied by departure and the assumption of citizenship or permanent residence in another country. It is the affirmative act of severing the legal bond between a person and a sovereign state — distinct from mere emigration, which involves physical departure without formal renunciation of allegiance.

The concept carries two distinct dimensions in law:

1. THE RIGHT OF EXPATRIATION: The principle that individuals possess an inherent right to renounce their national allegiance and acquire citizenship elsewhere. This right was historically contested — common law doctrine held that natural-born subjects could not unilaterally shed their allegiance — but was firmly established in American law by the Expatriation Act of July 27, 1868, which declared the right of expatriation to be "a natural and inherent right of all people."

2. THE ACT OF EXPATRIATION: The individual's voluntary conduct — renouncing allegiance, departing one's country, and establishing citizenship or domicile in a foreign state. Anderson's Dictionary draws the important distinction that expatriation requires more than changing one's domicile; it entails a complete renunciation of the prior political bond.

Common Language

Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Voluntary migration from one's native land to another; or, forced expulsion from one's native land.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): The act of banishing, or the state of banishment; especially, the forsaking of one's own country with a renunciation of allegiance.

Two gaps require attention. First, the Wiktionary definition includes forced expulsion — a meaning closer to exile or deportation than to the legal concept of expatriation, which historically requires voluntary action. Second, Webster's 1913 leads with banishment, a state-imposed act, before acknowledging the individual's renunciation. The legal term is anchored in voluntariness; state-compelled removal is a different doctrine entirely. A researcher encountering the word in an 1850s or 1860s text must determine whether the author means the individual right of renunciation or the older sense of punishment by banishment.

Common Confusion

EXPATRIATION, EMIGRATION, AND EXILE
Emigration is physical departure from a country without formal renunciation of citizenship; a person may emigrate and remain a citizen of the home country. Expatriation requires both departure and renunciation of allegiance — Anderson's Dictionary expressly states it includes more than changing one's domicile. Exile or banishment is state-imposed removal; expatriation in its legal sense is self-initiated. In some historical sources, particularly pre-1868 materials, expatriation is used loosely to describe any prolonged foreign residence, which can mislead modern researchers about the author's intended legal meaning.

Why It Matters in Research

The Law Mind corpus spans the period when American law underwent its most consequential shift on this question. Pre-1868 materials reflect the tension between the inherited English common law maxim — nemo patriam in qua natus est exuere possit (no man can shake off the country in which he was born) — and the competing republican and natural-rights argument that allegiance is a matter of individual consent, not permanent biological inheritance. Researchers working in antebellum sources will encounter both positions argued as settled law by their respective advocates.

The Expatriation Act of 1868 is the watershed. After that date, American legal sources treat the right as established, and the doctrinal debate shifts to its scope: What conduct constitutes voluntary renunciation? Does naturalization in a foreign country automatically expatriate an American citizen? Does service in a foreign military? These questions generated substantial litigation and administrative practice visible in the corpus.

A secondary trap involves Bouvier's entry, which simply cross-references "IMMIGRATION" — a significant misdirection. Bouvier's fuller treatment appears elsewhere and does address the right of expatriation and the 1868 Act, but the bare cross-reference may cause a researcher using the dictionary in isolation to underestimate the doctrine's independent legal significance.

Burrill's entry is particularly valuable for corpus work because it explicitly quotes and then challenges the common law maxim with its Latin citation, making visible the doctrinal fault line that animated the American debate. The contrast between Burrill's treatment and post-1868 entries in Black's and Anderson's maps the before-and-after of the legal settlement.

Historical Dictionary Support

The shelf sources present a clear arc of doctrinal development. Burrill's Law Dictionary anchors the pre-reform position most explicitly, quoting the Coke formulation — "No man can shake off the country in which he was born, nor abjure the obligation of his allegiance" — and citing Kent's Commentaries for the proposition that the common law treated perpetual allegiance as inescapable. This was the inherited English rule, and Burrill conveys it without apparent criticism.

Anderson's Dictionary of Law represents the post-1868 settlement most fully. It defines expatriation as requiring both renunciation and the intent to become a citizen elsewhere, quotes the 1868 Act's declaration of the natural and inherent right, and draws the analytical distinction between expatriation and mere change of domicile. This functional, rights-affirming definition reflects how American lawyers would have used the term after the congressional resolution of the controversy.

Black's Law Dictionary (both editions) and Black's (2nd Ed.) give the same spare, descriptive definition — voluntary abandonment of one's country and assumption of citizenship in another — without engaging the historical controversy. The definitions are practically identical across editions, suggesting the term had achieved doctrinal stability by the time of first publication. Bouvier's bare cross-reference to "IMMIGRATION" is the outlier and likely reflects an organizational choice in that edition rather than substantive treatment of the concept; Bouvier's fuller text acknowledges the 1868 Act.

The sources collectively agree that voluntariness is the essential element. None of the legal dictionaries follows the Webster's 1913 usage of banishment as a primary meaning, and all post-1868 entries treat the individual right as established American law.

Jurisdictional Note

The right of expatriation is a matter of federal law in the United States, and the 1868 Act was the foundational statutory text. Modern federal law governs the formal procedures by which U.S. citizens relinquish nationality, including the requirement of a voluntary and intentional act before a consular officer. The doctrinal questions that dominated the corpus period — whether naturalization abroad automatically divested American citizenship and whether the United States could demand allegiance from naturalized citizens who returned to their birth country — were substantially resolved by subsequent legislation and treaty practice. Researchers in the corpus period should be alert to the fact that the federal government and individual states occasionally used "expatriation" in statutory text with varying precision about whether voluntary renunciation or mere prolonged foreign residence was intended.

EXPATRIATIONmain

Black's Law Dictionary • 1891

The voluntary act of abandoning one's country, and becoming the citizen or subject of another. See EM

EXPATRIATIONcrossref

Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928

See IMMIGRATION.

EXPATRIATIONmain

Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928

The voluntary act of abandoning one's country and becoming the citizen or subject of another. The right of a citizen to do this has been much discussed. The question has been settled in the United States by the act of July 27, 1868, which declares the right of expatriation to be the inherent right of all people, disavows the claim made by foreign states that naturalized American citizens are still the subjects of such states, and extends to such naturalized citizens, while in for- eign countries, the same protection accorded to native-born citizens. Rev, Stat. §§ 1999, 2000. This declaration comprehends our own citizens as well as those of other coun- tries; 14 Op. Atty. Gen. 295. Since the passage of this act, the United States has entered into treaties with nearly all the nations of Europe by which the contract- ing powers mutually concede to subjects and citizens the right of expatriation on conditions and under qualification. And in case of conflict between the above act of congress and any treaty, it would seem the treaty must be held paramount; Morse, Citizenship § 179. To be legal, the expa- triation must be for a purpose which is not unlawful nor in fraud of the duties of the emigrant at home. But a woman who is a citizen of the United States does not expatriate herself merely by marriage with an alien, and in any event actual removal from the country and the acquisition of a domicil elsewhere are conditions precedent to such expatriation; 56 Fed. Rep. 556. There is no implied expatriation, and it will not occur unless in some manner assented to by congress, and the purpose to effect it must be manifested by some unequivocal act on the part of the citizen as to whom the question is raised; id. A citizen may acquire in a foreign country commercial privileges attached to his dom- icil. and be exempted from the operation of commercial acts embracing only persons resident in the United States or under its protection. See DOMICIL; NATURALIZATION. See also Miller, Const. U. S. 285, 297; 2 Cra. 120; 2 Kent 36; Grotius, b. 2, c. 5, s. 24; Puffendorff, b. 8, c. 11, ss. 2, 3; Vattel, b. 1, c. 19, ss. 218, 223, 224, 225; Wyckford, tom. i. 117, 119; 3 Dall. 133; 7 Wheat. 342; 1 Pet. C. C. 161; 4 Hall, L. T. 461; Bracken, Law Misc. 409; 9 Mass. 461; 21 Am. L. Reg. 77; 11 id. 447; 3 Can. L. T. 463, 511; 22 Law Rep. 641: 25 Law Mag. & Rev. 124; Law- rence's Wheat. Int. L. 891. For the doc- trine of the English courts on this subject, see 1 Barton, Conv. 31, note; Vaugh. 227, 281: 7 Co. 16; Dy. 2, 224, 298 b, 300 b; 2 P. Wms. 124; 1 Hale, Pl. Cr. 68; 1 Wood, Conv. 382; Westl. Priv. Int. Law; Story, Confl. Laws; Cockburn. Nationality.

EXPATRIATIONn.

Websters Unabridged Dictionary (1913) • 1913

The act of banishing, or the state of banishment; especially, the forsaking of one's own country with a renunciation of allegiance. Expatriation was a heavy ransom to pay for the rights of their minds and souls. Palfrey.

expatriationnoun

Wiktionary (English) • 2026

Wiktionary contributors • CC BY-SA 4.0 • via Kaikki
Extracted and formatted for display by Law Mind. Source link opens the current Wiktionary page and its contributor history; it is not a frozen copy of this extract.

Voluntary migration from one's native land to another. | Forced expulsion of from one's native land to another.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

Subscribe Encyclopedia Sign In