EXP

3 definitions found across Law Mind sources

EXPAuthored
The Law Mind • 864 words
Definition
EXP is an abbreviation appearing in legal texts, court records, and procedural documents. It has no single fixed meaning and must be interpreted from context. The most common legal uses include: 1. EXP. as an abbreviation for "expired" or "expiration" — used in licensing records, contract documents, statute references, and court filings to indicate a date on which a term, right, or instrument terminates. 2. EXP. as an abbreviated cross-reference directing the reader to "ex parte" or related "ex-" Latin prefixes — appearing in older legal dictionaries and indexes as a shorthand pointer to entries filed or decided on one side only. 3. EXP. in older English law as an abbreviation associated with exoneration or excusal of a party — appearing in procedural and pleading texts, particularly in connection with bail and suretyship records.
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): "EXP" most commonly means experience points (used in gaming contexts) or expiry date (used in everyday commercial and consumer contexts). Historical common usage: Webster's 1913 does not carry a standalone entry for "exp" as an abbreviation; the root "expire" and its derivatives were defined in conventional terms of breathing out, ending, or dying. The gap between common and legal meaning is significant primarily in historical research: a modern researcher who encounters "exp." in an older legal document or index entry is unlikely to guess it signals a procedural excusal, a bail exoneration notation, or a Latin cross-reference. The gaming and consumer-product shorthand carries no legal weight.
Common Confusion
EXP is frequently confused with EX, EX P., and EX PARTE when encountered in compressed indexes, marginalia, or early printed legal texts. Anderson's dictionary treats EXP as a direct pointer to "Ex, Parte," meaning the abbreviation carried no independent doctrinal content but served purely as an index shortcut. Burrill's entry complicates this by placing "exp." material in proximity to exoneration and issues doctrine, suggesting the abbreviation was not uniformly standardized across legal publishing. Researchers should not assume that all appearances of "exp." in a historical source point to the same concept.
Why It Matters in Research
The primary challenge with EXP in the Law Mind corpus is that it is an unstandardized abbreviation whose meaning shifts by era, publisher, and document type. Several traps exist: First, index-entry abbreviations. Anderson's treats EXP as a mere pointer ("See Ex, Parte"), meaning any document citing this abbreviation in an index context should be followed to the full "ex parte" entry rather than treated as a self-contained reference. Second, procedural shorthand in older records. Burrill's placement of abbreviated material near exoneration of bail doctrine suggests that court clerks and procedural writers used "exp." to flag records in which a principal had been excused or bail exonerated. Researchers examining historical bail records, recognizances, or surety proceedings should be alert to this usage and cross-reference with entries under EXONERATION and BAIL. Third, expiration notation. In modern legal filings — licenses, bar admission records, professional registrations, court-issued documents — EXP followed by a date is almost always a clerical expiration marker with no substantive legal significance beyond establishing currency of the document. Fourth, cross-jurisdictional and cross-temporal instability. Because EXP was never formally standardized as a legal term of art, its meaning in any given document depends entirely on the surrounding context. This makes it a poor search anchor in full-text corpus searches; researchers will generate noise. More productive approaches are to search for the full forms — EX PARTE, EXPIRATION, EXONERATION — and treat EXP hits as confirmation rather than discovery.
Historical Dictionary Support
Anderson's Dictionary of Law dispenses with EXP in a single redirect — "See Ex, Parte" — treating the abbreviation as nothing more than an index convenience. This is consistent with Anderson's general practice of consolidating Latin-prefix terms under the full "ex" heading. Burrill's Law Dictionary presents a more complex picture. The fragment appearing at the EXP entry is embedded in a discussion touching on the Statute of Westminster 2, exoneration of bail, and the definition of "issues" of land — citing Cowell, Fleta, and Tidd's Practice. The proximity of this material to the EXP head suggests either a page-layout artifact of the original printing (common in nineteenth-century legal dictionaries where columns ran together) or that Burrill associated the abbreviation with exoneration-related procedural entries. Neither source provides a formal definition of EXP as an independent legal term, which is itself instructive: the historical dictionaries treat it as a functional shorthand, not a concept. What the historical sources collectively miss is any treatment of EXP in its most modern legal context — expiration dating on licensed documents, court orders, and administrative instruments — which has become the dominant legal usage in contemporary practice.
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
See Law Mind Encyclopedia: EX PARTE; EXONERATION; BAIL
Related Terms
Ex parte — the most likely referent when EXP appears as an index abbreviation Expiration — the most likely referent when EXP appears with a date Exoneration — relevant to historical bail and surety records using this abbreviation Ex (prefix) — parent entry covering Latin-prefix terms in legal usage Bail — cross-reference for procedural contexts in Burrill Issues (of land) — adjacent material in Burrill's entry
EXPcrossref
Anderson's Dictionary of Law • 1890
See Ex, Parte.
EXPmain
Burrill's Law Dictionary • 1867
(588) of land. Cowell, Defined by the statute principal, or otherwise; signifying that the of Westminster, 2, (c. 39,) to include rents, bail are exonerated. 1 Tidd's Pr. 280, grain in barns, and all moveable things ex288. See an entry in Latin. 1 Leon. 58. cept horse furniture, clothing, and house. EXONIER. L. Fr. To excuse. hold utensils. See Fleta, lib. 2, c. 68, § 1. See Issues. An issue, in pleading. So called, according to Lord Coke, because "issuing out of the allegations and pleas of the plaintiff and defendant." Co. Litt. 126 a. But properly, because it is the end of the pleading. Exitus idem est quod finis, sive determinatio placiti; issue is the same as the end, or determination of the plea. Year Book, 21 Edw. IV. 35. Steph. Plead. Appendix, Note (10). De materia in exitu; of the matter in issue. 12 Mod. 372. A duty outwards; a custom on goods exported. Exitus de cocketto; exitus sigilli quod vocatur cocquett; issues of the Hale de Jur. Mar. pars 2, (de port. mar.) c. 11. See Cocket. The issue or result of an act. In maleficiis spectatur voluntas et non exitus; in injuries, the will or motive is regarded, and not the result. Britt. fol. 136 b. An end. Exitus termini; the end of a term. Bract. fol. 20. An issue, as the Essonier. See (589) To cut the foot or root of a tree, so as to occasion it to fall. Fleta, lib. 2, c. 41, sec. 32. De quercubus expeditatis. Id. ibid. ( 590 ) To deprive or take away. Calv. Lex. To EXPORT. [from Lat. exportare, from ex, from, and portare, to carry.] To carry out; to carry out of a country; to carry or send goods and merchandise from one country to another, in the course of trade. To carry out or convey goods by sea. Vaugh. 171, 172.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In