Definition
A historical common law writ issued on behalf of a ward of the crown, exempting that ward from the obligation to attend and perform suit of court at inferior courts — including the county court, hundred court, and leet — for the duration of the wardship. The writ operated as a formal discharge from the customary duty of suit owed by a tenant to such courts, suspending that obligation while the crown held the wardship.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This term belongs to a narrow and largely extinct corner of medieval English tenure law. Researchers will encounter it almost exclusively in pre-modern sources — particularly writs registers, Fitzherbert's Natura Brevium, and treatises on feudal wardship — rather than in reported cases or modern statutory materials.
The key navigational point is context: EXONERATIONE SECTÆ is not a remedy for wrongdoing or a defense in litigation in the modern sense. It is a writ of exemption tied specifically to the institution of crown wardship under the old feudal tenure system. That system was largely abolished in England by the Tenures Abolition Act 1660, which eliminated military tenures and with them the feudal wardship that gave this writ its purpose. The writ therefore has no living application in modern Anglo-American law.
Researchers tracing the history of wardship, prerogative rights of the crown, or the development of suit of court obligations will find this writ cited as one of several procedural instruments that defined the boundaries of wardship's privileges. It sits alongside other prerogative writs and exemptions available to crown wards and their guardians during the period when the Court of Wards and Liveries (established 1540, abolished 1646) administered such matters.
The Latin phrase itself encodes the writ's function: exoneratio (discharge, relief, unloading) combined with secta (suit, following, the obligation to attend a lord's court). Together they signal "relief from suit" — a pairing that researchers should recognize as taxonomically distinct from writs of exemption from military service or from taxation.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd ed.) provides the sole available entry in the Law Mind corpus, defining the writ as lying "for the crown's ward, to be free from all suit to the county court, hundred court, leet, etc., during wardship," with a citation to Fitzherbert's Natura Brevium at folio 158. That citation points to one of the most authoritative registers of medieval English writs, and Fitzherbert's treatment remains the primary analytical source for the writ's scope and operation.
Black's entry is accurate as far as it goes but is necessarily compressed. It does not explain the tenure law background that made the writ necessary — specifically, that tenants in capite held land directly of the crown and owed suit to various local courts as a condition of tenure. When the crown took wardship of an heir, the ward (and by extension the crown as guardian) had an interest in suspending those suit obligations, which could be burdensome and which conflicted with the crown's management of the estate. The writ was the procedural instrument for asserting that exemption.
No other historical dictionary in the Law Mind corpus covers this term. The Fitzherbert citation in Black's is genuine and resolvable: Fitzherbert's Natura Brevium was a standard reference on the forms of writs from its first publication in the early sixteenth century through repeated later editions, and the relevant folio covers writs relating to wardship exemptions.
---
Jurisdictional Note
This writ has no application in American law. It belongs entirely to the English feudal tenure system and became obsolete with the abolition of military tenures in the seventeenth century. American law never received the feudal wardship institutions that gave the writ its function.
---