Definition
Persons who are excused by law from duties, obligations, or burdens imposed upon others generally. The term is most often encountered as a noun in older legal sources, referring collectively to a class of individuals formally released from a legal requirement — military service, jury duty, taxation, or other civic obligation — that would otherwise apply to them.
The term functions as both a plural noun (a class of persons) and as the third-person singular present tense of the verb "to exempt," though the legal dictionaries uniformly treat it in its noun form when defining it as a term of art.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Plural of "exempt" — those who are exempt; persons or things excluded from a general rule or obligation.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Persons freed from obligation or duty; also used adjectivally to describe one free from service or burden.
The gap between common and legal usage is narrow but real. In ordinary English, "exempts" is simply the plural of the adjective-turned-noun. In legal usage — particularly in 19th-century American law — "exempts" was a term of art designating a formally recognized legal class, especially persons officially excused from military conscription. The legal meaning carries procedural and administrative weight that the common word does not: membership in the class of exempts was determined by specific statutory criteria, not merely by the fact of being free from a duty.
---
Recognized Forms
/SUBTYPES
In the historical legal context of military conscription, exempts were categorized by the grounds of their excusal:
Physical/mental exempts: Persons rejected as unfit for service on medical grounds.
Service exempts: Persons already in active military or naval service at the time of a draft call.
Prior-service exempts: Persons who had previously served in the military or naval service for a qualifying period (under the Act of February 24, 1864, two years of prior service was the operative threshold).
These categories were statutory, not judicial creations, and their boundaries shifted with successive conscription legislation.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers encounter "exempts" most heavily in two distinct clusters of the Law Mind corpus: military and conscription law of the Civil War era, and modern tax and regulatory law (where the noun form reappears in phrases like "exempts under Section 501(c)(3)" or "exempts from registration requirements").
The critical trap is period-specificity. When Bouvier and Black use "exempts" as a standalone noun, they are writing squarely within the conscription law framework of the 1860s. The Act of February 24, 1864 is the primary statutory anchor for that usage. Researchers working in post-Civil War sources will find the term's meaning drifting away from this military context as peacetime conscription disappeared, and the word reverts to its more general sense in later statutes addressing tax, regulatory, and civic obligations.
In modern regulatory research, "exempts" as a noun class appears in securities law (exempt persons from registration), tax law (organizations that qualify as tax-exempt), and administrative law (classes of persons excused from agency reporting requirements). These modern usages share the same structural logic as the historical military usage — a defined class released from a general obligation — but the statutory frameworks are entirely different and should not be conflated.
Jurisdictional variation is significant in the tax and regulatory contexts: state law exemptions (from jury duty, from state taxation, from licensing requirements) define their own classes of exempts independently of federal frameworks.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
All three historical sources — Black's (1st and 2nd editions) and Bouvier's — give virtually identical core definitions: persons not bound by law but excused from duties imposed upon others. The unanimity is unremarkable; the definition is structurally simple.
Bouvier's adds the most substantive content by anchoring the term in the Act of Congress of February 24, 1864, and enumerating specific categories of exempts recognized under that statute. This is the entry's real legal work, and it is historically specific: Bouvier is defining "exempts" as a term with active administrative and legal significance in the conscription machinery of the Civil War. Black's (both editions) offers the general principle without the statutory grounding, which makes Bouvier's the more useful source for researchers working in that period.
What all three sources miss: the term's subsequent migration into tax law, securities regulation, and administrative law, where "exempts" (or "exempt persons," "exempt organizations") became a major structural category. Historical dictionaries treat this as a conscription-era term and stop there. Researchers should not assume that silence in these sources means the term was unused in later legal contexts — it was simply repurposed in ways the 19th-century compilers could not anticipate.
---
Jurisdictional Note
In the military conscription context, "exempts" was governed entirely by federal statute, making jurisdiction largely uniform. In modern usage — tax exemption, securities exemption, jury duty excusal — the class of exempts is defined separately by federal and state law, and the two frameworks do not necessarily align. A person or organization that qualifies as an exempt under federal tax law may still bear state-law obligations, and vice versa.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
The Law Mind Tax Encyclopedia § 156: Personal Exemptions Historical and Current
The Law Mind Tax Encyclopedia § 186: Tax-Exempt Organizations 501(c)(3)
The Law Mind Business Organizations & Corporate Law Encyclopedia § 100: Federal Securities — Exempt Securities and Exempt Transactions
---