EXECUTORY INTEREST - The Law Mind Legal Dictionary

EXECUTORY INTERESTAuthored

The Law Mind • 1465 words

Definition

A future interest in real property held by a third party — someone other than the grantor — that can only become possessory by cutting short or jumping over another interest. Unlike a remainder, an executory interest does not wait patiently for a prior estate to expire naturally; it springs into possession or shifts from one grantee to another upon the happening of a specified condition.

Two subtypes govern the doctrine:

1. Springing executory interest: An interest in a third party that divests the grantor or the grantor's estate. The interest "springs out" of the grantor at a future moment. Example: A conveys Blackacre "to B when B marries." Until the marriage, the fee simple sits with A. Upon marriage, B's interest springs forward and cuts off A's retained estate.

2. Shifting executory interest: An interest that divests a prior grantee — another transferee — rather than the grantor. Example: A conveys Blackacre "to B, but if B dies without issue then to C." C holds a shifting executory interest that will cut short B's estate if the condition occurs.

Executory interests became possible in English law only after the Statute of Uses (1535) and the Statute of Wills (1540), which enabled future interests that the common law of seisin could not accommodate. Before those statutes, an interest that attempted to spring or shift in this manner was simply void. The Rule Against Perpetuities applies to executory interests and is the primary doctrinal constraint on their duration.

---

Common Confusion

EXECUTORY INTEREST vs. REMAINDER: The distinction matters enormously for research because courts and older treatises used these terms with varying precision. A remainder waits for a prior estate to end naturally on its own terms — the holder of the remainder is patient. An executory interest, by contrast, divests or interrupts a prior estate before it would otherwise end. A contingent remainder that fails at common law may have been saved or recharacterized as an executory interest under the Statute of Uses; researchers encountering a failed remainder in historical materials should check whether a court later treated the same interest as executory.

EXECUTORY INTEREST vs. EXECUTORY CONTRACT: These are unrelated concepts that share the word "executory." An executory contract is one in which performance remains due on one or both sides — a central concept in bankruptcy under 11 U.S.C. § 365. The Law Mind Business Organizations & Corporate Law Encyclopedia covers executory contracts in that context. When searching historical records or treatises, confirm which meaning the source intends; the confusion appears frequently in non-specialist secondary sources.

---

Core Elements

An executory interest must satisfy four conditions to be valid:

1. Created in a transferee (not the grantor): The interest must vest in a third party. An interest retained by the grantor that operates similarly is a possibility of reverter or right of entry, not an executory interest.

2. Takes effect by divestment: The interest becomes possessory only by cutting off or cutting short a prior estate — either the grantor's retained interest (springing) or another grantee's estate (shifting).

3. Triggered by a condition: A specific future event must be defined. If the condition is impossible or too remote, the interest may be void under the Rule Against Perpetuities.

4. Complies with the Rule Against Perpetuities: The interest must vest, if at all, within a life in being at the creation of the interest plus twenty-one years. Jurisdictions adopting the Uniform Statutory Rule Against Perpetuities (USRAP) apply a 90-year wait-and-see period as an alternative.

---

Recognized Forms

/SUBTYPES

Springing executory interest: Divests the grantor. Arises when a future event triggers a transfer out of the grantor's retained estate.

Shifting executory interest: Divests a prior grantee. Arises when a condition causes the estate to move from one transferee to another.

---

Why It Matters in Research

Historical source trap — pre-Statute of Uses materials: Executory interests as a recognized category do not exist in pre-1535 common law sources. If you are reading materials from before the Statute of Uses, references to future interests cutting short prior estates will either be void at law or will be described in the language of use (equitable interests enforced in Chancery). Do not project the executory interest framework backward onto medieval or early modern common law materials.

The remainder/executory interest boundary in historical sources: Courts through the nineteenth century were not always careful about the distinction. Many American treatises — particularly those written before systematic law school casebooks standardized the categories — use "remainder" loosely to include what modern doctrine would classify as a shifting executory interest. Rapalje & Lawrence, consistent with late nineteenth-century American practice, reflects a transitional vocabulary. Treat categorical labels in sources predating the twentieth century with scrutiny.

Rule Against Perpetuities entanglement: Because executory interests are subject to the Rule Against Perpetuities and contingent remainders traditionally were subject to the Rule as well (after the contingent remainder/executory interest merger in American law), research into whether a particular future interest is void requires understanding which rule applies and whether the jurisdiction has reformed its perpetuities law. Many states have abolished or substantially modified the common law Rule; a few retain it intact. This is one of the most jurisdiction-sensitive areas in property research.

Fee simple subject to executory limitation: This is the name of the present estate burdened by a shifting executory interest. When researching title questions, the grantor's fee simple subject to an executory limitation and the fee simple determinable are frequently confused; only the latter carries an automatic reversion (possibility of reverter) in the grantor.

Corpus connections: Research on executory interests almost always travels alongside research on the Rule Against Perpetuities, contingent remainders, and the fee simple on executory limitation. Trust instruments and wills from the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries frequently contain conditions that create executory interests; the Trusts, Estates & Probate Encyclopedia entry is the better starting point for testamentary contexts.

---

Historical Dictionary Support

Rapalje & Lawrence does not carry a dedicated entry for executory interest, which itself is instructive. The dictionary's strength lies in its case-citation method for contested terms, and the absence of a standalone executory interest entry reflects the state of American legal vocabulary in the late nineteenth century — the concept was understood through treatise literature (particularly Washburn and Gray on future interests) rather than through codified dictionary entries. The entry on powers in Rapalje & Lawrence, however, is adjacent and useful: it distinguishes powers of revocation from powers of appointment and notes how powers operating under the Statute of Uses enable the creation of new estates — the same statutory foundation that made executory interests cognizable at law. This is an underappreciated connection that researchers examining the historical roots of executory interests should pursue.

The dictionary's entry on bequeath and bequest — the entries the source material provides — are not directly relevant to executory interests, though the broader context of testamentary dispositions is. Executory interests created by will became possible after the Statute of Wills (1540), and bequests (personal property) and devises (real property) each had their own doctrinal trajectories. The Rapalje & Lawrence entries on bequest illuminate the testamentary vocabulary contemporaneous with the classical period of future interests doctrine.

What historical dictionaries of this period generally miss: They do not synthesize the Rule Against Perpetuities as a unified constraint on executory interests, contingent remainders, and class gifts. That synthesis happened largely through John Chipman Gray's treatise (The Rule Against Perpetuities, 1886) and was not yet settled as dictionary-level knowledge in the Rapalje & Lawrence era.

---

Jurisdictional Note

The common law of executory interests applies in all American jurisdictions, but the Rule Against Perpetuities — the main limitation on their validity — varies sharply. Some states retain the common law Rule; many have adopted USRAP with its 90-year wait-and-see alternative; a handful (including Delaware and South Dakota) have abolished the Rule for certain trust interests. Research on whether a specific executory interest is valid must begin with the jurisdiction's current perpetuities statute.

---

Encyclopedia Cross-Reference

Future Interests — Executory Interests (Springing and Shifting) (The Law Mind Property Law Encyclopedia)
Classification of Future Interests — Remainders, Reversions, Executory Interests, and Powers of Termination (The Law Mind Trusts, Estates & Probate Encyclopedia)

---

EXECUTORY INTERESTmain

Rapalje & Lawrence • 1888

BEQUEATH, (distinguished from "devise"). 36 Me. 211; 13 Barb. (N. Y.) 106. BEQUEATH MY CHAMBERS, (in a will). 3 Barn. & Ad. 469. 28. BEQUEATH TO, (in a will). 3 Harr. (N. J.) BEQUEATHED, (in a will). 13 Ves. 379; 119 Mass. 523, 525. BEQUEATHMENTS, (in a will). 3 Green (N. J.) 386. BEQUEST, (defined). 89 111. 246.

EXECUTORY INTERESTmain

Rapalje & Lawrence • 1883

ment, which enable the donees to create 29. 12. Revocation, or appointmentPrimary, or subsidiary.-Powers are also divisible into (1) powers of revocation, which give only the right of revoking exby custom.-Powers operator appoint new estates. When a power ing by virtue of a custom (e. g. a custom applicable to copyholds) resemble those under the Statute of Uses in their effect, but they are less flexible in their application. Chance Pow. 3, 27. 10. Appendant, or appurtenantIn gross, or collateral-Merely collateral, or naked.-Legal powers are (1) "appendant" or "appurtenant" when the donee has an estate in the land and the power is to take effect wholly or in part out of that estate, as in the case of a tenant for life having a power of leasing, or a mortgagee having a power of sale; (2) "in gross" or "collateral," either (a) where the donee has an estate in the land, but the power does not take effect out of it, as where a tenant for life has power to appoint an estate to commence after his death, or (b) where the donee has no present estate, but may exercise the power for his own benefit; (3) "merely collateral" or "naked," where the donee neither has an estate nor can exercise the power for his own benefit, as in the case of executors having a mere power of sale. If lands are devised to an executor with a trust or power of sale, this is sometimes called a "power coupled with an interest," to distinguish it from a bare or naked power. (Co. Litt. 113a.) This classification of powers is of importance with reference to the ability of the donee to release, suspend of appointment is not preceded by an existing estate, it is sometimes called a "primary power;" when it is preceded by an existing estate which the donee may revoke, it is called a "power of revocation and new appointment," or a "subsidiary power." (Wats. Comp. Eq. 759; Leake P. L. 374.) As to the operation of appointments with reference to the rule against perpetuities, see APPOINTMENT, & 1. 13. General.-Powers are either general [absolute] or limited. A general power enables the donee to appoint the property to any person or persons (including himself), for any estates, and on any conditions, and is therefore equivalent to ownership. (Sugd. Pow. 394.) If he dies having exercised it by will in favor of a volunteer, or if he becomes bankrupt, the power forms part of his assets for payment of his debts. (Wms. Sett. 40.) In the case of a person dying after having exercised a general power by his will, the doctrine is, that by exercising it he is in ordinary cases presumed to have meant to take the property out of the instrument creating the power for all purposes, so as to make it form part of his estate; and therefore if the appointment fails (e. g. by the appointee dying in the appointor's life-time), the property results to the appointor's estate, and not to that of the donor of the power. If, however, the donee only exercises the power

executory interestnoun

Wiktionary (English) • 2026

Wiktionary contributors • CC BY-SA 4.0 • via Kaikki
Extracted and formatted for display by Law Mind. Source link opens the current Wiktionary page and its contributor history; it is not a frozen copy of this extract.

A third-party interest in an estate in land created by the conditions of a grant wherein the grantor gives the land to a second party, but with said land going to a third party upon the occurrence of a condition; an interest created subject to a fee simple subject to executory interest.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

Subscribe Encyclopedia Sign In